Jump to content

Ice's Modelling Journey


Ice

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

Recently I've been learning how to model for the W3D engine and I just thought I'd show some of the projects I'm working on. If anyone has feedback/suggestions regarding methods or other related subjects, that is always appreciated. While I currently only have a basic knowledge of modelling, I want to expand my skills into many different aspects of modelling, including buildings, maps, people, and other complex objects.

 

With that said, I'll start with a (very) early WIP of some city buildings I'm working on:

 

 

zXb2wro.png

 

 

These are intended to be used in a map which I plan to make in the near future, but I'm also using these as a learning experience to improve my skills and methods, so any feedback will be greatly appreciated! :cheers:

Edited by Ice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know absolutely nothing about modelling, other than modelling my rock hard 6-pack.

 

Seriously though, I hope you keep going with this Ice, it's great to see someone improving their skills for the community.

 

P.S.- Make sure the buildings are canonical to the CnC lore :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not much of a modeller myself, but I often found that one of the hardest parts is adding detail, imperfections and "clutter" to the model to make it more realistic... this is often where my imagination let me down! You'll also have to figure out which details need modelling in and which could be added with texturing etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking nice, I like the overhangs on the roofs. Danpaul's right about adding details and deciding what to texture and what to model. Personally I base that decision on the scale of the detail, if it's a downpipe say I'd model it, but a small drain or maybe a keyhole would be textured. That also depends on how good of a texturer you are and how much time you want to spend on it. If you're better at modelling it can be faster and more convincing to simply model every detail; but that's only an option if you're making something for art's sake and have no complexity constraints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are some initial shots of the wireframes. Each building is currently divided into 3 objects: Exterior, interior, and roof. This is early WIP so there are still a lot of n-gons and other stuff to sort out. One of my main learning goals is being able to model buildings efficiently, in the sense of poly usage and minimizing waste/redundancy, as well as being easy to work with and modify as needed.

 

 

Ha0X8ih.png

YOrOzbE.png

aexymTV.png

 

 

Edited by Ice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Took a short break from the buildings today and made an old-fashioned traffic light prop:

 

 

xIwpyyu.png

 

 

 

EDIT: More detailed version:

 

 

niBISXs.png

 

 

Edited by Ice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are some initial shots of the wireframes. Each building is currently divided into 3 objects: Exterior, interior, and roof. This is early WIP so there are still a lot of n-gons and other stuff to sort out. One of my main learning goals is being able to model buildings efficiently, in the sense of poly usage and minimizing waste/redundancy, as well as being easy to work with and modify as needed.

 

 

Ha0X8ih.png

YOrOzbE.png

aexymTV.png

 

 

 

Please take my post with a grain of salt given how out of touch I am, but looking at your wire frame my immediate concern is with W3D lighting engine, and particularly the process of vertex solving in Level Edit.

 

It actually often made sense back in my time on the team to ADD extra faces in areas that lacked them. I personally did this process manually in order to 'draw' where W3D would render light sources and such. Looking at your windows, it will likely result in sharp shadow edges and light 'stretching out' unrealistically across your model.

 

Just something to consider.

 

Good models besides that. I personally always though the biggest challenge came from texturing your 3D work - Especially when you got this picture in your mind that requires new textures for everything!

Edited by Raap
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is indeed still a concern.

 

Coincidentally, discussing this very subject with you was one of the last things I happened to be doing while on the BHP team, according to my personal message logs on their website. :)

 

 

I also got reminded of why I left the team in great detail, but that's another story. :v

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the heads-up. Do you have any suggestions for how I should set up the faces on the buildings? Considering these are specifically for W3D projects.

 

Also I rounded out the surface of the lights a bit. I think I can consider this model finished. Now I just need to unwrap and texture it.

post-10478-0-84171300-1453060577_thumb.png

Edited by Ice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the heads-up. Do you have any suggestions for how I should set up the faces on the buildings? Considering these are specifically for W3D projects.

 

Also I rounded out the surface of the lights a bit. I think I can consider this model finished. Now I just need to unwrap and texture it.

 

You'll have to experiment as the exact answer depends on the object's usage in your map(s) and there light sources originate.

 

A general rule I used to apply to everything was to always draw edges in such a manner that it connects every face, this is to prevent shadow issues. A crude method of doing this is to manually draw the edges using 3DS vertices snapping... Exact wording might differ in the tools since I've not used it in 4+ years. And another thing I did was that rarely a face/polygon would be larger than about three or so meters, in order to minimize the stretching.

 

In a really small map you can get away with simply raising the overal polygon count in your models, but in most practical cases you have to strike a realistic balance for performance reasons. The middle ground here is to make normal terrain relatively safe on the polygon count, but areas which you know are in close proximity to a light source you raise the polygon count at in a round or spherical shape in order to effectively 'draw' the light on that geometry as smooth as you can.

 

I hope this post made sense.

Edited by Raap
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just showing a couple other things I've been working on lately; A WIP collection of old-fashioned stop signs with the traffic light from before (not quite to scale), and a Russian-style rural water tower:

post-10478-0-45358300-1457064455_thumb.png

post-10478-0-01109700-1457064464_thumb.png

Edited by Ice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bare-metal parts of the signs now have actual textures, instead of blank blue test fill-ins :v

 

gAwAEBI.png

Edited by Ice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any difference between a halt and a stop sign (we don't have halt signs around here, honestly curious if there is a difference)?

They're just various old-fashioned stop signs from different countries. From left to right: America, England, Germany, Czechoslovakia, Italy, Finland

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Any difference between a halt and a stop sign (we don't have halt signs around here, honestly curious if there is a difference)?

They're just various old-fashioned stop signs from different countries. From left to right: America, England, Germany, Czechoslovakia, Italy, Finland

 

Don't know why I just fixated on the Halt sign, if I'd have looked at them all I'd have gone "DERP, all stop signs"

lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know why I just fixated on the Halt sign

 

Because it told you to stop, drop everything you were doing, and pay attention to it. And you, being the good citizen you are, did exactly what the sign asked from you.

 

Working as intended.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was away all last week for an army course. Got the traffic light unwrapped yesterday and have applied test textures to make sure everything is arranged correctly (i.e. the faces aren't flipped or something):

 

dE5y0Qe.png

Edited by Ice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...