Category 5 Hurricane

I did, actually, target you as planned, so there shouldn't be anything wrong unless I myself was messed with. I did get some message that would seem to imply I was being watched or something like that, so I'm guessing Jeod watched me?

What the fuck, no way!

Looks like the plan is going to happen. This better work as intended.

You changed yours! How can you suggest you're trying kill yourself when your switch was an attempt to save yourself?!

That's it, only Shade moved? ##vote OrangeP47

What, upset that you had to make the vote change to save your ass?

Ok, I take that back, something did happen.

Ok, nothing happened. SWITCH ##vote iLikeToSnipe

Is that something you want to avoid?

He has one. Apparently.

I'm kinda lost on how I want to vote right now, so setting up the tie gives me a chance to see what happens when votes move. You know how this works. Though right now I see that the only vote that might more is ChopBam's.

Fuck it, let's throw some ties up in this sum bitch and see what happens! ##vote Shade

OrangeP47, if this is a bluff intended to clear a townie by seeing how willing they are to be lynched by your action, say it now.

It seems like OrangeP47 may have been lying about his ability and actually gave you lynch immunity rather than what he was saying before.

Yeah, maybe get back to me after we're done having this argument. The vote I've been expecting to make has shifted from iLTS to Shade to OrangeP47 to VERT and I'm not sure it's done yet!

KY stopping iLTS? Could be town versus town. Both seem plenty happy to be the #1 vote Orange's plan, though in iLTS's case, this could be a scum plan with Orange. If it is, iLTS can't be lynched today anyway. Me stopping Shade? Maybe. What I'm told is that I'll increase the chances that an action will fail, and that how it'll fail depends on what the action is. I'm not told what the possible effects are, though my suggested changes were to change actions or change targets. I find this to be the worst case to follow because I don't even know if I can cause the NK to fail, and if I did I'd probably expect a different target to die. iLTS stopping you or Killing_You? Given that you have an action result that doesn't match what I would expect, of the three cases, I think yours might actually be the most likely. The big problem is that we don't know if ANY of these are the reason why no NK occurred.

Holy shit, do we really have three different reasons for why the NK might have failed now? This is an Ace Attorney level of turnabout shit.

If I'm resolving a tracker action on a target that was roleblocked, I'm giving a report that the target didn't move. Maybe OrangeP47 actually has the answer there.

I've aleady said where I'm going with this. If you track a roleblocked target, I would expect that you get a result that the target did not move. I would not expect that your action would return "wasn't able to"

No, I was actually saying maybe KY did the NK and claimed roleblocker when the kill failed. That isn't my top suspicion right now, but I am trying to figure out why VERTi60 thinks he can confirm a roleblock on a tracked target.

But it would also add up if iLTS was BP as he claimed, hit by a NK, and didn't move. Right? Or do you expect the result to be different just because the target was roleblocked?

I don't understand. Why would a roleblock stop you from tracking the roleblocked target? Wouldn't the result be "target did not move"?

It might be better to just let it happen and see if it could be a conspiracy or not. I'm really torn on this right now. On the other hand, if OrangeP47 is Mafia, we probably win D3.

won't be lynched no matter what, I should add. Given immunity.

I think it's a bluff and iLTS won't be lynched. I'm not sure it's a scum bluff, though.