Jump to content

OrangeP47

Forum Game Masters
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    11,352

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    23

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

 Content Type 

Everything posted by OrangeP47

  1. OrangeP47
    I'll admit, I see Worf, I give Worlf a like.
  2. OrangeP47
    No, not the abilities I've claimed. The abilities some imply might be different could be beneficial to scum. At least get your argument straight.
  3. OrangeP47
    Some people doubt me, suddenly, and for little reason.
  4. OrangeP47
    We don't know all items work that way. Quit being obtuse.
  5. OrangeP47
    Oh, btw, something else we've not thought of. There are items in this game. People could perhaps do more than one thing ala Jeod's games that way.
  6. OrangeP47
    The answer to what? I'd agree with you. I don't like the wording as described.
  7. OrangeP47
    HAHAHAHAHAHA. That would be a pretty ballsy claim from KY, made before (right?) he knew iLTS did nothing.
  8. OrangeP47
    Are you saying Verti was actually the one to try and use a NK, and hit a BP iLTS?
  9. OrangeP47
    I didn't feel I need to, most actions are targeted. Yes, the irony in that Blind Justice isn't, but it's the exception, rather than the rule.
  10. OrangeP47
    I think we'll have to agree to disagree. I spelled out exactly what it did. It's not my fault you didn't understand.
  11. OrangeP47
    Because making it blanket would allow for too much shenanigans. It's also supposed to be about saving a possible town, not messing with the vote.
  12. OrangeP47
    Also, all of these complaints would have been EQUALLY valid if this was just a blanket action. I don't see why people choose to bring them up only after they found out it was a targeted action. I reiterate, I think certain people may have planned to mess with the vote last minute and are now flailing once they realize it doesn't work that way.
  13. OrangeP47
    If the targeted person isn't 1st vote, it's just a wasted use.
  14. OrangeP47
    Well if we don't maintain first place votes on him he certainly won't be lynched.
  15. OrangeP47
    Shade939's voice: Wow, you sure do like voting town
  16. OrangeP47
    The thing I requested was this day action, and it's actually considerably morphed from what I requested
  17. OrangeP47
    I DIDN'T request the role. Are you still having trouble reading I was just happy to have more actions than I requested.
  18. OrangeP47
    It'd still be random. We'd have to get lucky. TBH I felt incredibly lucky to get a non-town result first try. If I was insane, that makes the odds of that go up. The action is called Blind Justice, and it's not one I requested, was just pleasantly surprised to receive, so thematically it might fit to be insane.
  19. OrangeP47
    To be fair, that actual could be insane, and I need Cat 5's help to make it sane or something.
  20. OrangeP47
    It's semantics. For something to be a true test, I would say it would have to be mod confirmed. This isn't mod confirmed. We ARE, however, using it LIKE a test. I've done work with legal fields. Even though I sometimes let my standards go lax, I'm very particular about my semantics.
  21. OrangeP47
    The ability specifically says "not Scum", so maybe I'm the one confused. Maybe it will still lynch third party.
  22. OrangeP47
    I use scum to refer to just mafia directly, generally.
  23. OrangeP47
    If I called it a test at any point I honestly forget. I was pretty careful to not call it that, though, and I never said Irish would confirm it, I'm certain of that.
  24. OrangeP47
    I'm pretty sure I never said it was. That quote you have there doesn't show me saying it.
  25. OrangeP47
    It's not like Irish tells us if the skipped person is town, third party, or neutral. It just happens.
×
×
  • Create New...