Jump to content

OrangeP47

Tester
  • Content Count

    8,347
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

OrangeP47 last won the day on August 10 2019

OrangeP47 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

217 Excellent

About OrangeP47

Profile Information

  • Ingame Username
    OrangeP47

Contact Methods

  • Steam
    OrangeP47

Recent Profile Visitors

2,036 profile views
  1. TBH I'm just glad the people who can make the charts didn't die because I'm not good at that. I can't count the number of times I've tabbed back to page 4 to look at the web.
  2. While I don't want to rush you, there are other things I want to do with my life, and I think all that's going to be said has about been said. The most helpful thing to do is probably just to reread all that's been posted. ILTS thinks it'll help him, but really, it'll expose him, because he's being disingenuous.
  3. Like Shade's right. ILTS is the anti-Orange. No matter what I do, I get scum read, and no matter what ILTS does, he gets town read
  4. Maybe my inital scum read of ILTS was just actually right. Maybe my call out of his non-engagement this entire game such as the "that's interesting" being a scum tell, is not "grasping at straws", but is actually.... wait for it... CORRECT!
  5. You can't call my argument meritless while also admitting it has some merit. That's pure doublethink! By D2 I was pretty much settled on KY and was persuing that line of thought but you were refusing to engage with me and then just up and turned on me.
  6. That's not what I expected either, but that basically means it has to be ILTS cause it's not me. I investigated ILTS and got town, but I'm pretty sure I'm the naive cop. ##Vote ILTS
  7. No, you're the one that's wrong, it DOES have merit to town. Maybe on balance less merit than no lynch, but the bolded is a contradiction and not a valid argument. Furthermore, I didn't attack you. YOU ATTACKED ME. My D1 spat with you was over by the time you came roaring in with whatever the hell this is. This is on you. Framing this as my crusade is just outright false.
  8. I mean, I'm not saying my logic was optimal D1, but I will defend it as *valid*. However, what you people need to remember is being wrong =/= being scum. That's why, for the life of me, if Chop dies, I'm going to have a hell of a time actually deciding if ILTS or KY is scum, because I have a massive blind spot when it comes to if people are actually casing me or if they're just wrong.
  9. I mean, that is the question The thing is, fortunately for you and unfortunately for us, the thing to do is to just wait and no lynch still and decide tomorrow, so we don't really get to put that question to the test, as satisfying as it would be.
  10. Or you could just be trying to railroad us now.
  11. I mean, as another bit of evidence, ILTS is the one that wants to jump the shark now, after trying to paint himself as the one being the creator of no lynch.
  12. That's just like, your opinion man.
  13. I think you're reading of my posts after it was clarified you wanted to double no lynch is very uncharitable. I actually was fine with it pretty quickly after that. As for the rest of this, I've basically been asked to defend my original reasoning, and I have, I don't know what else you want, I won't apologize for it.
  14. We'd get more reports no matter what because the game would continue. Reread my original arguments. It's about CONTROL. Reports and flips happen naturally as the game progress. It's about town choosing who flips, not scum.
  15. Oh yeah, I guess Friday is *daystart*. My bad. Then I won't be here for hammer Saturday probably, assuming nothing crazy happens and scum doesn't decide to off me
×
×
  • Create New...