Jeod

I want to know 3 things. 1: Who has the radio or was it a ruse? 2: What’s a crowbar got to do with thievery? Sounds like a scum weapon. 3: What are you voting for? Wifom if you feel it’s necessary.

There is no walkie in the vault. Who’s lying?

Yet you threaten to vote radical over it to try and keep the stalemate.

The deal I accepted was progress, not any particular side. Am I to understand you against breaking the stalemate?

##reform military

Haven’t chosen a reform yet. CvC?

Agreed. Breaking the tie is in my best interest.

I work an 8-5 shift today and will be back about 30 mins before hammer. I'll watch the thread when I can. Do we need to investigate Sunflower given she threatened to vote radical? Or is it moot because she's innocent?

Well, I'd assume that civil war will enable killing actions. As a result, scum would need to wait until the night after a civil war is announced to perform a kill, unless an investigation triggers one. Until then, I see no need to spend PP on my protect action.

Oh, you're right. Where did I get a stack from? Odd.

He said there was a 'stack' and that he took one.

I'm not sure why the frames in that gif are all showing, but it's nice to see you've adopted an Ace Attorney persona.

The radio, if it's true that scum desire it, will be leverage. If they kill me while I have it, then they won't be able to acquire it (I assume). There are also apparently medkits in the vault. Having one might grant me a BP power, who knows.

I haven't been taken seriously at all the entire day despite trying to scumhunt and call out things that look weird. I've posted and been ignored. I've had to claim my ability because a select few people refused to quit being stubborn. Visiting the vault is, to me, compensation as well as a possibility to gain additional protection--plus it allows me to verify claims of those who've already been nominated.

Because of how I've been treated thus far, and because I'm interested in the game mechanics.

We're still not 100% certain if there's an 'Abolishment Party'. It could be a scare tactic or it could be real, but I think there's more to the details. The primary idea, when stripping away all the fluff, is that you've got a radical voter willing to vote a soft option. If there is a party that wants to maintain a tie, then knowing which option I'll vote for easily allows them to continue a tie and perhaps force an event. However, by not knowing which soft option I'll vote for, they have no way to plan anything. If this is a Shadespiracy, then you still win by having a radical voter go soft. Orange could watch me to see how I vote, but that ruins the point of your bargain. You want soft pluralism to win. So, we need to add another element to the mix somehow to maintain the randomization of the soft option.

I feel it can be too easily manipulated.

I was thinking "consecuences".

This is indeed true, if your theory about the Abolishment party is correct. No matter which soft I vote, quo or pluralism, it will force them to guess an option to maintain the tie, if they can even maintain it with an extra player voting soft. I like Snipe's offer, but it needs some ironing out. We can use it for more than one angle. There isn't any reason to protect anyone yet, since there are no death mechanics until a civil war begins.

As far as I’m aware there’s still 25 hours left.

Me if you want me to vote soft.

Advice not needed, give it to these fools instead. I just raised the stakes. If a civil war starts, I'll be the first target by our enemies. So, stop dicking around and prevent a civil war.

Spend 7 pages pretending the doctor doesn't exist and refusing to entertain his ideas. Well done, a crowning achievement indeed.

My ability is protection. I'm a doctor role. As proof, you can check my immediate reaction to TheIrishMan's comment back on page 10 or so. Happy now? You better pray we don't end up in a civil war.

Take note, morons. This is not how you win a N1 radical-for-the-lulz player to your side when he'd already said he was willing to cooperate.