I mean, it would be good practice and very informative. Shade, make a town list, and explain why you think each person is town. It's a perspective we rarely get, and it would be most illuminating.
Also, can we not nominate the same person we're lynching? :P
I was about to say this almost feels too easy... You'd expect a scum-partner to do some pushback. The nominations are interesting though....
I see I've failed to convey just at what speed I'm wagging my finger at you
(I was saying you get a pass, for now, but don't think you're off the hook long-term)
Unless you suspected FRAYDO and myself as a *team* verification would have taken place anyway. Again, given we can do an item and a normal action, it doesn't actually clear us anyway, so it's kind of a useless watch.
Yeah but ILTS is pretty believable and, of the reads available, was one of the most town read. We have to go on *something* if we want to play the game.
Even I'll admit there's been suspiciously little attention given to me. That's why I wonder more about Chopbam. That might have been an attempt to push things off onto me or FRAYDO, but when we were basically like "yeah, so what?" it just kind of faltered.
Well I meant that as an example of killing being item based. Scum could have a kill-item. OR, the watching was an item, and the kill from the same person (Chopbam) was indeed normal. There's a lot of possibilities.
I assume killing can be standard action OR an item. I don't think the rules need to be explicit on that mark to make it the case either. I considered vig as a item, for example.