Chaos_Knight
-
Posts
805 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4 -
Donations
0.00 USD
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Documentation
Bug Tracker
Downloads
Posts posted by Chaos_Knight
-
-
Just now, VERTi60 said:
I mostly agree with your assumptions here. Thing is I was willing to investigate myself today if that's what everyone would want but given the fact we have night kills on our ass, such action would only delays us and probably cost my life as I would be second confirmed innocent to jeod. Would you agree that we should go for someone who is either suspicious or hostile?
Well duh. Catching a hostile if such exists would be great because it would be all but confirmed killer (which brings a question if town can become marked as "hostile").
Problems would start if killer isn't marked hostile atm.Suspicious players might not get us far I am afraid since they can still be anyone.
0 -
1 minute ago, Killing You said:
So you're saying there's a correlation between evidence validity and the status of the holder?
Might be.
We don't know it for sure. Ah, the joy of "figure it out yourself" game mechanics.1 minute ago, VERTi60 said:Who do you think was the killer?
Also everyone else should speak up so that we have some food for discussion.
I'd suspect either Fraydo or Orange atm (I mentioned it yesterday that these two would be suspects aside from CK but it looks CK could be cleared tonight by the nominated player)
Realistically speaking, I can suspect (in declining order):
FRAYDO - Mr. Unknown. Where is he anyway?
You - You countinue to act as if you seriously have something to hide. I can't shake off this feeling.
KY - Again, sort of a dark horse. He had a grenade at the start after all. On the other hand, he's somewhat helpful.
Orange - We don't know much about him really. He's kinda helpful but also secretive.
Retal - "Sleeper" role eh?
Mojo - He has a gun for one. Another "sleeper" role if I am not mistaken?
Irish - Trying to steal my sympathy with charts again. Ehh.
Cat5 - As funny as it is, all we know for a fact is that he had a spy glass. Though he's fairly contributing.0 -
Well, looks like we have the first kill. And we can't lynch yet... How wonderful >_>
Hopefully, doing kills at very least would mark the person as damn hostile outright, else stuff might get complicated to handle.
0 -
1 minute ago, VERTi60 said:
I would be willing to get investigated tomorrow while I'm still innocent and see if I have evidence on me -- but I should know if I have one no? I don't but I would like to test this theory anyway. Although if we could catch the thief or somebody more dangerous that would still be better then doing experiments. I think we get evidence only from suspicious people...
I had no evidence on me as well according to my PM. Yet, look at that, an evidence.
Maybe all Serbs have some since Black Hand is serbian after all? Might be worth checking out.0 -
27 minutes ago, VERTi60 said:
Boo yeah!
Seems like we're lucky catching Black hands (members?) holding evidence. How many more there can be? If each holds a evidence, then maybe we could indeed win without kill but I kinda doubt it will be that easy.
We may want to resort to using or passing that Grenade to make sure the thief won't steal it Jeod.
Don't get your hopes too high up. I may be suspicious but again. I am not scum or thief so you aren't all clear yet.
I start to suspect that actually a lot of people might have evidence on them without any prior warning. Which in turn means that even FRAYDO as "unknown" as he is, might be not a scum member.
0 -
Just now, VERTi60 said:
Let go of the booze, CK
Never! It runs in my veins.
That, and, well, what else can I use for stress-relief?
0 -
Just now, VERTi60 said:
Princess? :D
You should know the reference.
0 -
5 hours ago, VERTi60 said:
Chaos Knight is playing way out of his meta btw. He never missed a chance to send in a night action, especially if it was important (doesn't matter if town or scum now). If he has IRL/busy issues, he usually notifies before hand (did he report it?)
Well, excuuuuse me, princess.
Not every IRL thing is something I can forsee and warn about, nor would I want to make said thing public. That's all I am gonna say.5 hours ago, VERTi60 said:The bored part is also curious, esp. since he has an active ability able to confirm people's actions.
Yep, totally gonna reveal the fact that I might have an important role for no apparent reason. That would help everyone for sure. Don't be silly
5 hours ago, VERTi60 said:Either way CK doesn't care much about the game or he's definitely trying to evade being in a spotlight and investigation.
Eh, not that I don't "care". Just was pre-occupied on one side, vacation on the other and I prefer more solid data on the 3rd. Simple really.
Either way, go ahead and investigate me really. If nobody minds, I could hammer myself unless you people prefer to have extra time.
0 -
1 minute ago, VERTi60 said:
I said I don't have any actions, I'm bored vanilla here
(X) Doubt.png
1 minute ago, VERTi60 said:As for your proving, it would have merit after being investigated as well.
Well, if you actually read what I wrote, that's exactly what I am saying. It's just gonna be delayed by 1 phase if I am investigated.
0 -
Just now, VERTi60 said:
Defensive? I'm replying on your bullshit claim and an attempt to shift attention back to me. As I said before, I have no problem being investigated, but it's a wasted investigation since I don't hold any evidence nor items. You on the other hand...
Btw I am also Serb, so there's that. 4 and counting.
I can prove my "bullshit claim" of being a tracker after N3 or N4 depending on if I will be investigated today or not.
What can you prove?
0 -
23 minutes ago, VERTi60 said:
The attack happened when my shift was over and I didn't have an opportunity to log in in the tram. (sorry to burst YOUR bubble)
That's really an interesting way you are trying to shift attention. Very.
Also can anyone who was tracked confirm that they receive a report of it?
Why so defensive all of a sudden? I know I am in spotlight right now, but in all honestly I doubt I have much to fear from investigation. Unlike lynch it's pretty harmless. Also I am Serb. Which makes it 3 of us I believe? If Mojo is sincere about his claim.
Are you afraid of what we might find out if we investigate you by any chance?
Also I doubt that anyone gets any reports about tracking, else Cat5 would've spoken up on D2 about it.
0 -
13 minutes ago, Retaliation said:
It occurred to me while making soup that if chaos was a scum tracker that would let them know cat5 had a usable item.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but nope. I am no scum and I can see no items on any person, nor I require items to track people.
Jeod trying to grenade me looks quite curious to me personally. Felt kinda out of the blue (also attempted murder, makes me wonder if he's guilty now?). Then again, I brought this upon myself with my inactivity. >_>
Also Vert kinda disappeared after the attack on me. Tisk-tisk.0 -
1 minute ago, Category 5 Hurricane said:
@JeodThis is why I'm trusting Retaliation. He's thinking the same things I am, even if I'm not saying them. It's one thing to parrot me, but another to say things aloud that I'd been thinking but didn't say.
Litereally role baiting 101. Claim a role and wait for someone to counterclaim.
Then again, I wouldn't be surprised to find 2 trackers or something like that in this game setup. I can prove myself N3 or N4 (depending if you'll want to investigate me).
0 -
Just now, Retaliation said:
I find it odd you didn't question jeod's tracker claim if you aren't a tracker yourself.
Because I learn from my mistakes.
(*cough* DeathNote *cough*)
Why out myself before I have any good info? Now it's a different case. Since spotlight is directly on me, might as well cooperate.
0 -
3 minutes ago, Category 5 Hurricane said:
So, Chaos, you have time to talk now. Perhaps you should do so?
I am quite multitasking atm but alright.
If you wanna know more about my role, I am a full-time tracker. No items, no evidence. Tracked you N1, saw you visit Orange, didn't report cuz I don't know who you are. Don't want to out doc or cop to scum ya know.
Didn't send my action N2 since, well, wasn't there due to IRL reasons.Atm I am suspicious. Might be because I am a lazy bum. As stated in my N2 result (lol).
0 -
Oh mang, a grenade.
Also RNGesus normally hates me too. So let's see.
0 -
So a thief, eh. Now this could be quite problematic all important items and evidence considered.
I could see why Cat5 would be targeted (yea, Jeod, stealing a typewriter seems like a pretty silly idea XD ). That, of course, implying that Cat5 is speaking the truth about what happened last night, and the thief is real. I understand that Cat5 is fairly high in "towny" list but in all reality we don't know all too much about him. Just saying.As for why it's not me.... Well, tbh I wasn't even online for basically whole N2 actually due to some IRL stuff. /meta
Other than that I doubt I can prove my innocence here so you'd have to take my word for it. You can investigate me if you wish, but I have no items and no connections to scum.
5 hours ago, Retaliation said:Is the grenade one time use?
Geez, I wonder XD
I think this is a quote of the game so far.0 -
Just now, Jeod said:
Why ask a question nobody knows the answer to?
Just like nobody seems to know why tensions raised (or claims so), yet question is still here. Because this data can be useful as well as to see if anyone has their own ideas. Simple really.
I could also ramble about GM putting up pictures with text which can't be actually trusted/used but I guess it could be considered blurry enough? Maybe? Oh well.2 minutes ago, Category 5 Hurricane said:Why are you specifically curious of Retal when Mojoman said something very similar?
Because I missed that claim of Mojo's and it's 3am. Ahem.
(And because last time I let go of my suspicions of Retal's phrases and behaviors we basically lost to scum.)0 -
3 minutes ago, Jeod said:
Certainly. It's likely flavor. That headline is the legitimate NYT headline:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/17/Headline_of_the_New_York_Times_June-29-1914.jpg
I know it's an actual headline. I was just curious if it could have any sort of useable info for us since actual history articles aren't gonna help much obviously.
0 -
Just now, Jeod said:
It's touchy because lore isn't as much of a deal in this game (thanks Nodlied). Notice that I haven't changed my vote.
True, but the headline I mentioned earlier is literally used for every image on D/N start. XD
Can it also be, well, inaccurate?0 -
What makes me curious is the claim that Retal doesn't have an access to a night action just YET.
8 minutes ago, Jeod said:at he is after a single assassin, who murdered the late Duke
Which also means that this bit from the OP post about some "Bosnian youth" killing the guy isn't exactly true. Wasn't the actual killer, like, captured right after the act IRL? I mean they did have to learn his age and country of origins somewhere after all to put it on a headliner.
So your source might not be completely honest with you.
0 -
Well, so far it's pretty boring on my side of things as well.
I doubt Jeod's ability has anything to do with tension though since it's just some text he can write up at will. Indeed just like Chicago mafia game (ah, good old times).
There has to be something else affecting tensions.0 -
Well, from what I can tell about the evidence thingy is that true one would raise the "Evidence" bar while fake one would not. At least that's what I've gathered from the OP. So I don't think we can actually "Fail" with the fake evidence, just we won't uncover the truth untill all misleading items are removed from the "truth" box.
##investigate Jeod
Even though I'd say it's unreliable atm, I'd still prefer to investigate Jeod for now. Since he has the tendency to lead town around, at least we'd know more about who he is.
0 -
Oops, I almost forgot to check if the game started.
So investigations reveals current status but not alignment. Question is, how exactly is current status calculated? I kinda doubt that scum would be straight up guilty and all the townies are straight up innocent, otherwise it would be counterproductive to the very mechanic itself.
1 minute ago, TheIrishman said:You say that no evidence exists, but how do you know that? The evidence meter is already at 10%, so there could be evidence in there initially.
While you have mistaken world tensions with evidence count (10% is the tensions), a good question as to why evidence doesn't exist. Since there already was a murder story-wise, there has to be something. But it hasn't been discovered yet.
0
[Game Over] The July Crisis Mafia
in Forum Games
Posted
Well, FRAYDO is already on the 1st place in the list, you can't get higher than that
Plus it would be kinda hypocritical of me to blame him for being suspicious while I am suspicious myself? Also so is Cat5 apparently.
As for "sleepers" I suspect that some of them might be not true. Just saying.