Jump to content

ChopBam

Staff Moderators
  • Posts

    5,444
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    208
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

Everything posted by ChopBam

  1. I'm interested in testing out his unlynchable claim. ##vote Nodlied
  2. I am actually on board with this, seeing that I can at least somewhat verify your claims from last night. ##nominate OrangeP47
  3. So you hand out one slice of cake each night, to the first person who visits you?
  4. Your not having a night action complicates things a bit.
  5. Wait nvm I read that again (i'm on my third cup of coffee today)
  6. So if he's lying, his odds of proving his ability are improved?
  7. Because I'm too lazy working, can somebody create a chart of all claimed visits/items?
  8. True, but I was more approaching it with the angle that iLTS suspects Shade as #1 scum, therefore any dubious item Shade receives must be third party.
  9. Why are you sure it's a third party and not aligned with mafia?
  10. Shade, did you receive two items?
  11. If I'm typing large posts (rarely these days), I'll type it up in a separate app and then paste it over.
  12. That's certainly true. In addition to this, there must be scum members who didn't attempt to attack you, so neither of them is off the list of general scum potential. But I do think it's less likely they were involved in an attack on you last night.
  13. I'll wager most of the sheriff's board is comprised of town members. They'll keep their hush.
  14. It could be deadly in the west to come out with that exact kind of "thing." It's why I'm only sharing this with the sheriff's board and not the entire town.
  15. I mean, I have insider knowledge. It's a bit awkward but last night I was minding my own business when I happened to spot them through a window, making out with no holds barred. Neither of them spared any time to attack you.
  16. I'll just add that I have a strong suspicion that neither OrangeP47 nor FRAYDO were involved in this attack on you iLTS. This narrows the suspect pool slightly.
  17. Are you like the one-man peanut gallery?
  18. Any dingus who can read the day's opening post can see that the nightkill failed....
  19. While OrangeP47 and Shade are arguing like two little lovebirds (I love to see lovebirds, it's cute, like really cute), I'm sitting here still laughing about how smug Verti60 got taken out last game.
  20. ...which I guess is a higher level of skepticism for me than it is for you...? Anyway, I'm all for letting the man speak.
  21. I don't think it's unreasonable to be skeptical, precisely for the reason that we have no idea what his report is going to be, combined with the fact he's asking for any potential counter-claims first. Do you think it's unreasonable to be skeptical?
  22. Still though I'm interested to see what you're thinking @iLikeToSnipe
  23. It's also possible he wants to get any potential counter-claims out of the way so he can claim something fantastical happened that can't be disputed.
  24. iLTS, I didn't watch you or track anybody to you. I also have theories as to why the nightkill didn't happen, but they're only theories. Since you're so certain that you have special knowledge about the lack of a NK, I'm interested to see your special knowledge.
×
×
  • Create New...