VERTi60

But orange, you lied about the whole thing already. And jeod and ilts helped you support your plan..

Well if you are selecting a player it can mean anything, and there is no wording about a test or alugnment condition. Which means orange can simply rescue someone from lynch rather than test...

If you are picking a person who will be skipping a lynch it might as well not do what we wanted - aka test alignment!!! @TheIrishman pls elaborate on day action result!

Also phone keyboard mafia edit *you *picks

Why do yo7 need to pick targets? Didnt you say it p8cks firsr 2 top voted?!!!

Same question for mr. buffguy @FRAYDO, why do you think KY would lie when he didnt know about ilts not doing anything? Also, @iLikeToSnipe are you claiming to be a bulletproof day blocker?

Why would KY lie though? He would have to be sure about you not doing anything, ilts.

Since no one is here, I just skimmed the thread quickly, there's a lot of claims which some add up more, some less. From all the mess I think I can reply to this, it seems that KY's claim of blocking iLTS is true since I can verify he didn't visit anyone. Fraydo jumping from all the people on KY is interesting since we also have a "cop claim" from Orange (who we shouldn't trust 100% until he can prove at least his first, day action claim). I don't know what to make up from all the Shade-Nodlied-Jeod-Chopbam claims, I would need some more info or at least some sort of explanation, but if I'm understanding it right, I think it can provide enough evidence that none of these guys were associated with a failed NK (if there was one - we can also have the same situation here from last CYOR). Which brings us to Cat5, Fraydo, iLTS and Orange. While Cat5's, FRAYDO's and Orange's claim can't be verified completely (but they can add up), iLTS here is the only one here who's being a bit shady and who I know was blocked based on KY's claim and my action result. I should be available later during Sat night and then before hammer to see how things are developing but for now, the logic dictates: ##vote iLikeToSnipe

To clarify, I have an item that will be passed to town player once I die. That item can be used on players, it can reveal some info about them too. I can also use the item (for me it does tracking), and I used it on iLTS last night to see who he targeted last night - got a result "I wasn't able to".

I have a "backup role", which doesn't have zilions of OP actions like you guys have. It's more or less designed to help town if I am lynched or night killed. I don't have time to read every post, can someone throw in a table of actions and claims (aka IrishChart^TM)?

The great Ryuk#2 doesn't claim to have a night kill immunity as well? *almost* hard to believe... Or better yet, you want to lure night actions your way just like you did during the day. His following posts appear to be a subtle effort to take the conversation away from "the Shade plan", which failed. He then failed to vote Shade even though he was present for hammer. I retracted from voting Shade since you and Orange turned a good plan to clear multiple people into a plain vote train on Shade. I see that equally scummy, if not more even as Shade's "slips" (note that Orange was defending him earlier and I was the one pointing it out).

Do me a favor and bus Jeod tonight He likes it (I promise)

I think this was all a ruse - Orange making it all up while you were distracting town to get votes on Shade...

You and Orange are scummy in my book same as Shade

Hmm, useless action, doesn't sound threatening though.

Is that valid action?

*when

I would vote shade if Orange would stick to the plan, but I guess this turned to be from something productive (as KY put it, "clear 3 people at once") to a train on Shade (which is justified, but not as productive).

You want to talk about lil 'o me? *blushes*

An immigrant bus driver I presume?

It's already in US (IL), being processed by USPS

Hopefully my "present" arrives soon too.

In here we call them "sisky" [shishkie]

Now I want donuts. Eat pant.