Jump to content

Jeod

Forum Game Masters
  • Posts

    9,136
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    81
  • Donations

    5.00 USD 

Everything posted by Jeod

  1. I smell someone trying to lure me into using my daykill. It's not necessary.
  2. I lied about my lynchproof claim. I have a night action called Rune of Sight that is effectively a watcher action. Two players visited me. One of them was Shade. I can only assume the other has a doctor action. ##vote Shade939
  3. Hey @Shade939, keep in mind that if you're truly not scum and you do have a bus ability, you'll end up switching NK targets as well. Consider who asked you to bus me and who else you're using the bus on. Use wisely. Apartment moving day is tomorrow and I'm packing up my desktop tonight--will have a laptop instead. So I'll be less active than I was on Day 1 until Sunday.
  4. Welp. Shade and Vertigo are my current suspects for scumteam and I'll tell you why. This was the last thing Shade said before he vanished for 3 hours. Could he have been busy? Perhaps, but due to the circumstances today and his activity, I'm more inclined to believe he was told to shut up in the scumdoc. Soon after, Vertigo pops in to say this. His following posts appear to be a subtle effort to take the conversation away from "the Shade plan", which failed. He then failed to vote Shade even though he was present for hammer. I'd like a protection role on me tonight.
  5. Really? Weren't you the one expressing concern over Orange revealing his ability thus becoming a potential target for scum?
  6. This. Consider my last couple of posts a hint to what I want to discuss in a masonry.
  7. Well, we know Vertigo is watching. However, he also happens to be one of the topics I wanted to talk about in a masonry tonight. It all depends on the flip.
  8. So we currently have a tie between Shade and NoLynch. I don't like that. Not only does it further veil Orange's ability (it could easily be a coin flip under the false pretense of the ability), but it also means the only thing to come out of Day 1 is that scum have a few different night targets and town has nothing gained.
  9. Could someone mason with me tonight if possible? I have some thoughts I'd like to share, though not publicly just yet.
  10. Noted for future reference. Possibility of different perspective.
  11. I honestly can't find any hint of a partner trying to get Shade out of the mess he's put himself in. But, I am suspicious of the current votes. Shade bandwagoned the No Lynch, so if he does turn out to be scum, it may be a safe bet his partner is also voting No Lynch right now.
  12. CVC: Killing You voted Shade OrangeP47 voted nobody Jeod voted Shade iLikeToSnipe voted Shade Shade939 voted No Lynch Nodlied voted Killing_You Category 5 Hurricane voted No Lynch ChopBam voted No Lynch FRAYDO voted No Lynch Verti60 voted nobody No Lynch: 4 Shade: 3 Killing_You: 1 @FRAYDO, not voting would be better if you don't have the time to catch up on 15 pages. If we want to save Orange's ability for later, we need Shade at the majority. Do I need to point out (again) that Shade/NoLynch is also an opportunity to see if Orange is lying about his ability and will save Shade?
  13. That isn't an argument I ever made and wasn't the basis for the lynch. Shade hinted at being neutral, and then town, and then stated this about his ability, only in the past two hours.
  14. It's always a possibility, but nearly everything Shade's posted points to the contrary. If you have some other D1 lynch in mind, please elaborate while we're a mere two hours from hammer.
  15. It’s doubtful. 4 hours to hammer. Again, less risky and more optimal to just outright Lynch shade without an ability. He’s claimed neutral, so if it’s true then it’ll waste your ability.
  16. Yes. Neutral party is non-hostile but can still be dangerous since they can choose which alignment to help. They always have their own win condition.
  17. That or neutral that wants to have the big stick. From CYOR 3 experience once shade has gone off the deep end he’s irredeemable. If neutral than we should consider him a third party at this point.
×
×
  • Create New...