OrangeP47

Shade, just because you're bad at scum hunting doesn't mean everyone is. I was killed last game because I was a good scum hunter, remember, that's why you didn't get to see any of it, so I guess I can't fault you for not being able to bask in my glory.

See, here's what I'm thinking. And yes Shade, it's D1, so this is all very tenuous, but it's nice to at least have SOME theory, and hey, guess what, it incorporates your stats! Granted, I will concede I can see why you lot might still want to no lynch and this isn't a strong case so I'm not gonna push this hard, but here's what I think: Retal could be the spy, and KY's vote was an uncoordinated attempt to distance, pulled off clumsily. I know it was hyped up that scum were a well oiled machine last game (though they lost, and fell apart in the end), but that's not the norm these games, especially right out of the gate. Maybe I'm wrong, but this is at least *a discussion point*. A shame it comes with only 2 1/2 hours to go until EoD.

Shade if you don't shut up I'm going to shoot you even though I think you're town.

Shhh, let him answer.

I mean there's allegedly a small chance he could have died, from his point of view

Where would you have gone if he did or did not follow through?

I'd like to repeat my comment here, but unironically.

How many people are voting for you right now?

Aren't you people (though not you, Shade, specifically to be fair) the ones that complain we don't traditionally scum hunt enough?

Fair trade, South Carolina probably doesn't have to deal with the snow on the roads like us up here do.

So I hoped people would be active while I was asleep, since there's usually at least a few posts, but I guess not. Anywho, I guess we will have to continue to stir the pot. @Killing_You, why did you react as such to Retal's "bluff"? You weren't directly involved with him before that.

I'm not sure if the case for no lynch is as solid this type of game as it is during others, though I can see arguments either way. I do hope it doesn't stall conversation out, but I'm rather busy myself so I can't put my money where my mouth is really. Assuming I'm alive D2, I'm pretty busy D2 as well.

I mean, I'm *trying* to play Battletech but you cretins keep posting.

Yeah how could we overlook this?

Yeah his location is set to North Macedonia in his profile, it's 1 AM there.

He's in CET IIRC where it's 1 AM.

Voe's being an idiot but sometimes that's par for the course, I've yet to determine if that's scum or bad town.

Why did nobody ever do this for me, the countless times I announced in the thread I was going to bed?

Honestly there's a few people I'm sus at, for various reasons, but for these specific reasons, I don't particularly care for KY's aggressive stance towards Retal, even if he's backed off now.

Eh, I think it's valid for either, though, if anything, I'd say it's easier to pick up on in larger games rather, if you want to critique it.

The argument I usually make when making wagonomics arguments is that the first person on a train isn't the scum, it's the 2nd/3rd voter who's trying to make a mislynch gain steam. (Adjusted for our gamesizes). However, the wider point here, is the look for people being opportunistic, or going after "low hanging fruit/LHF".

I hadn't considered that last point, I suppose, but I still don't think it's great exposing power roles or provoking a confrontation. The deciding factor for me, I think, is that if push comes to shove, scum will likely fire first, and thus have the advantage in the end.

It's a bit early for "true" wagonomics, though I have been thinking about it. For now just think about people who appear to be opportunistic.

Wait, anon does have thoughts, he's voting Mojo...