Jump to content

Shade939

Forum Game Masters
  • Posts

    8,419
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    17
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

Everything posted by Shade939

  1. Which they'd probably love to have more forces exiled to the wall for them to command.
  2. In short, expect a systematic serious of rebellions across the entire game then.
  3. Or if it's over, which I assume means it's fails since if they succeed we would get a new King automatically.
  4. Never mind, it does state that their is an exception if the Rebellion is defeated.
  5. Going to point out, but for this first rebellion phase at least, you don't get that option of picking to Rebel if the Rebels are defeated. It'll default to whatever game mechanic Verti set up to force players to rebel if that'll function.
  6. He also said the game ends if no one can rebel any longer, so that can only happen a limited number of times or is tied to a specific action.
  7. See if he'll show up before the first day ends and is more active.
  8. Wait until he used his magic pain glove to hit you in the face.
  9. I don't think they're rebels anymore after the revolution ends though...
  10. If you want a simplified argument, the odds of a day one lynch based almost completely on RNG is most likely going to end up targeting the largest group in game which is the Royals, which is exactly what the Rebels or any independents would want.
  11. I have to protect my surf you know, not enough fish and all of that stuff...
  12. So, does that mean you're volunteering for the vote then?
  13. A cult mechanic would seem a bit on the OP side given how easily that would let you sway entire armies to your cause. There would have to be some sort of limiting factor to it so it wouldn't completely override the Royals ability to put down a rebellion.
  14. There's still probably a base penalty for removing the Lord from control of his land and installing a new leader. They can counteract that penalty by sending them to the wall, but I'd suspect general instability to increase int he kingdom every time a Lord is overthrown.
  15. Well then, that actually doesn't imply that the Hand of the King is a Cop...
  16. It's not a difficult case to make. Usually you should require something more along the lines of proof to eliminate a player, which at best I might buy that the Hand already coped a player in which case I would have assumed Jeod would bring that up. And do you know how the rebels turn players over to there side? I really doubt it's a straight up cult mechanic where a royalist is forced to join the rebellion every night.....
  17. I would assume eliminating any house from the game would result in an increase in WIN. Of course, you might just prefer to have less players in game in general though.
  18. Are you aware of what effect this vote would have on WIN?
  19. I'm assuming it's the actual forces on each side, since otherwise we'd be lacking in a way to keep track of this mechanic.
×
×
  • Create New...