Shade939

By the way, could you explain this a bit more?

Now, here comes the obvious question of why do you need to be nominated for the vault in order to carry out a plan that should already be in your own best interest?

That's probably a fair point, it's not as easy to balance the votes if you were already voting for one of the soft options in this case, which would be the safest option for them to have voted for previously.

To be fair, given how the game is set up it woudln't make any sense for the Abolishment party to be as easily found as seeing who voted for the Abolishment objective.

Am I?

There's also the problem that Jeod isn't the only one who can switch his vote, and it's in the Abolishment parties best interest to maintain the stale mate between the two side as they try to start a civil war. After all, if both sides are equally as powerful as each other when a civil war starts, that increases the odds that both sides will wind up taking each other out allowing the Abolishment party to win.

The goal of the Abolishment party is to prevent both sides from wining, to which effect they will switch their alliance to whatever side is losing in order to advance their own third party objective.

That's why we have three parties in this game instead of two.

KY visited him last night so he can confirm his abilities also. That's the main reason I believe he was willing to state he's actually a Doctor so soon.

He is a doctor you know...

And what exactly do you plan on doing to him if he doesn't change his vote?

Also, given the current situation, it would make more sense for someone who supports Pluralism to make that deal instead, and have them swap their vote for this one reform in exchange for accessing the vault.

Yeah, those type of deals only make sense if we're actually aware of everyone's political alignment and actions.

I actually want to push for a Cat5, iLikeToSnipe or FRAYDO but he has a key so that's a touchier target to investigation today based around the probability that they have an item they could actually use to kill players that would expose them as being part of the mafia.

Honestly, I'd assume that Mafia basically started out with a non-hostile alignment, so they want to be investigated earlier before they do anything hostile and can actually be eliminated by the investigation instead of merely jailed for a night.

Having an evidence key allows you to frame other players, not access to the vault itself. But apparently, it also leaves a log of what actions you do in the vault that anyone with an evidence key is also allowed to view. So as long as FRAYDO and Orange aren't part of the same political party they can't freely frame anyone, and even then if you try to frame someone, it sounds like that's a hostile action so their status will change to suspicious and they can be voted up then to be jailed and lose their key.

Are you also a pirate?

Players SQ/PL/A% TheIrishman 33/33/33 @TheIrishman, not eliminating the possibility of you being pro abolishment I see.

Is now a bad time to point out that someone somewhere in this game should have an item or ability that actually lets them kill players that we can look for.

Not necessarily, that only works if everyone who voted for pluralist is actually a pluralist instead of a mafia member or vice versa.

Fine, I'll wait one more day and see if we can get around a tie without resorting to more drastic actions.

Think it's about time to reveal character information yet @OrangeP47?

Would you actually have the PP to use it.

@OrangeP47...

Yep, that's a fair response actually.