[Blog 133 (20/05/09)]

Awesome, the new models are great.

 

I really liked the part about the new staff member, that was my favorite part.

 

Thanks for the congrats guys.

[Blog 132 (14/05/09)]

I'd say that the battle fortress was pretty rough, everything else was fairly good.

[Blog 131 (06/05/09)]

The body Looks great IMO.

 

The turret just seems a little round and maybe a bit too high off the body.

 

I don't think OWA was expecting this much feedback

[Blog 131 (06/05/09)]

No I agree with EVA-251, It's not supposed to be that round. I thought it looked a bit off.

[Blog 131 (06/05/09)]

I like the grizzly model, hope you guys can get some more help with textures.

[Blog 130 (29/04/09)]

Awesome, watching the video now.

 

Office looks really detailed it's great.

 

 

 

Edit- If the minor weak point turns the power off, can be fixed and there is 3 of them (do all need to be killed or just 1?)

Why not just go for the main weak point?

 

I'm thinking if you kill all 3 of the minor weak points the allies have to repair all 3 to get power back?

[Blog 123 (05/03/08)]

Wow that Harrier is going to look awesome.

[Blog 122 (25/02/09)]

Well I think also since both mods are from "bluehell productions"

that may have something to do with it.

[Blog 121 (19/02/09)]

Once again another great interior.

[Blog 120 (13/02/09)]

Everything is simply awesome great job guys

[Blog 118 (28/01/09)]

Haha, The face is such a cool touch, would make a funny Easter egg to play as well

[Blog 117 (21/01/09)]

haha the face on the statue is going to be trippy

 

I wonder how melee weapons are going to feel on the W3d engine.

 

 

hmm youtube video not available in my county, wow never gotten that one before.

[Blog 116 (14/01/09)]

loldrill

 

 

I'll have to read though that building controller stuff a bit tomorrow when I have time.

[Blog 115 (08/01/09)]

Well really everyone thought it was an IFV but someone said we hadn't guessed it or at least thats how I understood it

[Blog 114 (04/01/09)]

No, I never made any mention of anti-structure benefits of any of them

And Tanya can only C4 Tanks in YR, not standard RA2, it'd also be a bit unbalanced.

 

I hope there are guardian GIs, I want to use assault rifle and Bazooka (inis say it's same as GI's weapon, ingame it looks like a GI deployed MG).

 

 

Read up on the blogs you will find that this game uses all the YR tech for allies and soviets and pretty much any features as well.

[Blog 114 (04/01/09)]

I'm thinking some civilian vehicle or some cut vehicle.

[Blog 114 (04/01/09)]

Watch it be something completely different.

[Blog 113 24/12/08]

I like the propaganda truck.

 

Podcast should be fun, new testers? yeah I got to get on that

[Blog 110 (03/12/08)]

People complain about the blogs?

 

Heresy!

 

 

Soviet barracks is looking good.

[Blog 109 (26/11/08)]

Amazing progress on the Barracks.

 

 

I had no idea so many people were asking about a PR job, I have to admit I thought about it.

[Blog 108 (20/11/08)]

Great blog keep it up!

[Blog 105 (29/10/08)]

Song was interesting but I did like it, awesome interior good job dtrngd, and I can't wait to see it textured.

[Blog 104 (22/10/08)]

watching video now yay!

 

Ooh a Fully promoted War miner is going to be fun!

[RA2:AR FAQ]

Now that sounds interesting to say the least

[RA2:AR FAQ]

On a completely random and off-topic note, was there a definitive statement about cell-shading?

I like my cells shaded.

 

And I like my cell shading to be optional as I'd prefer the realistic look

I want to see Ra2 up close, how it would look if it really happened not even more cartoon like when It's already got enough, and if other people do want it that way then I want them to be able to. Thats why I think it should be optional if possible.