ChopBam

Alright I went back to D1 and here are my observations. Looking at voting patterns is a good way to hunt scum. Orange did a "soft defend" on Irish. Orange did a "soft defend" on Killing You. FRAYDO seems extremely unlikely to be paired with scum. This was a serious vote, and combined with his other posts he's probably very last on my list. Mojoman is unlikely to be paired with KY. I hope we're making you proud now @Retaliation Now these posts are interesting. Since we were down to the last hour, votes were critical at this point and nobody had a strong lead. Therefore I will submit that Orange was unlikely to be paired with Mojoman. No longer can I really say I fully trust KY. If there were three scum to start with, he's likely our last guy. See how hard he pushed Mojoman the next day, and quite well I must say. I will need to revisit Day 2 to remind myself how that went. IRL was a whirlwind for me during that time.

Right now I trust your character but not your judgment.

Also, way to try to poison the well in terms of me voting for you. But fuck waiting till the last minute. ##vote iLTS

Either iLTS woke up on the wrong side of the bed today or his desperation level skyrocketed soon as he saw a possibility of himself getting lynched.

You have arrived at your conclusion way too quickly and you're pushing it extremely hard. With each post you make, the worse you're looking.

If I acknowledge that Orange and Mojoman were busy N1, someone else killed Verti. Who still living has a confirmed alibi for N1?

this post is really ringing my alarm bells

This isn't even a meme, gtfo

Exactly, you can't fake this kinda stuff unless you're really experience at this kind of thing.

Here's one more for the iLST-is-scum case. iLTS may be comfortable pushing me as hard as he is, because he's done the math. Go on this red herring goose chase with Louis, trying to take an item that's not there. Lynch some other town today (1), NK tonight (2), lynch me tomorrow (3), NK the following night (4), and with two scum left that's a pretty confident-looking plan.

The way I see it, at least one living player in this thread knows for certain I am town, and they are one of three things: Pushing me strongly as scum. On D3 this may have described Cat5, but now on D4 I am seeing it as iLTS. Playing the sheep and just following the reasoning to push the scapegoat but not spearheading it, lest I flip town before gameover and the cards fall back against them. D4 this describes Cat5, FRAYDO, and KY. FRAYDO and KY I trust their characters more than I trust their judgment. Cat5 still has a decent likelihood of being scum, because of reasons others mentioned. His slight "change in heart" toward me could be the realization that I may die and flip town before he'd win as scum, bringing the house back down on his head if he pushed too hard. Sitting back, being inactive, and letting me take the heat from well-meaning townies. I'm actually leaning on this with my vote on Mojoman, as he is just sliding by pretty easily since the scapegoat work is being done for him by others. Lastly this could describe Louis, and I'm not even 100% against a lynch on her, but she reads the least scummy to me out of the rest of you here as her posts read genuine. I really feel like we could use a chart. I'd prefer a scummy TheIrishman to a scummy iLTS, because at least Irish would make [publicly accountable so therefore accurate] charts that would help everyone follow what's happened with claims over the days and nights, so things could be pieced together. For one, giving each person an alibi that's been confirmed by others for each night would be great so we can rule out some suspects and line up other claims to see what doesn't fit.

Why do you think I was singling you out? Because I was responding to you and your flimsy reasoning? FRAYDO and KY are currently reading way more townie to me now than you are, so that's one reason I chose to give this exact response to you instead of them. Not that this exact response was particularly "singling out"-like, even. I'm more interested now in why your internet heart rate suddenly spiked.

Your entire quasi-town post is flawed because it stems from this false premise. I'm still trying to puzzle together whether you already know that I'm not scum, as this is a very strong statement and line of bullshit to follow, for somebody making a bunch of assumptions about a 1-Up, of all things.

I'm tired of merely talking the talk. ##vote Mojoman

Better luck too.

This is what new townies under pressure say. I probably would have also said something like that when new, but I am willing to fight because I believe in myself, even when nobody else does.

Ok.

No, you're opportunist if you're scum.

The point wasn't to doubt you, but to have realization. The thing that makes the most sense to me is that one of the guys who's being an opportunist and pushing for me is the one we're looking for. Cat5 or iLTS. I can't puzzle out which, and I'm a bit dubious of your read on iLTS unless you have more information you're not sharing on why you think he's a townie.

Ignoring the 1-Up as a lynchproof for me, I do have the warp star which is a one-time lynchproof. Why would you like the idea of me having one time lynchproof and being scum, but not Mojoman? Did he? I have been missing this info [as usual]. This lends itself to a scum still alive that's not Mojo.

For some strange reason I can't get on board the Cat5/Chop train, so I'm going to be looking at Mojo and iLTS today. The main reason I'm not going straight for iLTS is that FRAYDO is vouching for him. Not that a mere read means much with iLTS, he has fooled us in the past. I also am suspicious of Majora's intentions, who in terms of character was only focused on destruction, unlike the other Zelda villains. Town decided a few days ago Mojo was worth lynching. Then when half of him was lynched, town decided to forget about him. What happened to the line of reasoning that led to the lynch?

Bah, that's what they all say.

Interference?

@Killing_You Are you then on the Cat5/Chop train?

If I'm somehow town with some weird off-the-wall stuff going on, then how am I supposed to provide adequate answers to your three points? It assumes I have some kind of solid answer or knowledge that I really don't have. The burden of proof is on me to invent or come up with some explanation that I really have no idea of? That's truly unrealistic.