FRAYDO

If I am to sit in the "paranoia tells me iLTS is scum" camp, I can see Wrath being a powerful ability for scum to swing the vote in their favor. The question then would be why would it need an intentional teamkill attempt to activate this day ability that now apparently has two uses. Aside from myself, I don't believe any of us have claimed a night action with potential to kill. For reference if it was missed earlier, my roleblock action had the potential to kill myself and my target, which may have very well been the activation that iLTS could have used instead of relying on his teammate to strike him. If I do believe the theory that KY intentionally attacked iLTS, I just find it very hard to see why they would trade BP for extra voting power so early into the game.

I see. My current question would be why Cat5 chose to mason me. Maybe an attempt to coerce me into his camp if he is our remaining scum after all, maybe covering his tracks with the tracker.

Why didn't the gummies go to Cat5 again? That's what reveals abilities or am I mistaken?

On another note, if this is to be true then Scatter can't be yours although fitting as it may have been for your Scrin flavor.

You have mine. Will you wait for Cat5's report or care to share your report now?

Only as much as our masons allow, at least.

Such was my plan anyway, and now that one-shot action is gone.

I should add that my roleblock had the possibility of killing my target and myself, with the result of either winning the game or helping us narrow down our scum list should Cat5's death clear the air.

I've posed the question. I suppose I'll get the answer to that later. It is a tad alarming.

Well this was an interesting result. I attempted to roleblock Category5 instead of tracking, and he effectively hit me with a "no u" and opened a masonry with me. In other words, my action failed and his succeeded.

I would rather Orange continue with his plan to blow up Louis and we lynch Cat5. One of them has to be the remaining scum??

This is really a problem.

(I found you can edit Shade's CVC when I quoted)

@Jeod

Approaching 10 minutes.

That's twice now.

Would you do it for a Kaiji-sized Scooby Snack?

@Jeod is the tiebreaker then?

Y-yes! Of course! (Don't send me to the Dead Doc)

There are just too many points here against Sunflower. In this web of counterclaims, I think it falls on Sunflower for the lynch unless Louis' claimed roles as (Doctor/Thief) are false. ##vote Sunflower

I just don't believe iLTS' BP would have caused Sunflower's action to fail.

There is still the question of the counterclaims and Sunflower conveniently being blocked twice. I don't think we should let this go.

Cat5 saw that Louis had done the action already too. (continuing along the bluff suspicion)

I was thinking this too

Didn't Jeod also suggest that the Scatter action may be a complete lie?