FRAYDO

so iLTS lived? haha no mislynch after all it was a prank bro @iLikeToSnipe

...we won?

WHAT

that's a joke right? RIGHT ?

I can't take this anxiety what's the game ending

HUH

What a taunt.

not too late for that 50/50 retal

@Jeod so the gummies die with iLTS then? Assuming the mislynch, what's your role going forward?

One can interpret this change of meta due to the two of you being a scum team. It's a wild shot sure, but we'll know soon.

Are we to understand there was no N1 NK after all? and iLTS and KY have always been this team? It's a confusing order of events, but I suppose this flip may reveal the truth.

I suppose we should attempt to coordinate this, as risky as discussing this in the open may be. You are targeting iLTS tonight? and Retal, you have a claimed roleblock available? (judging solely from my flashbacks to Horthy)

Updating CVC on my end because why the heck not while we watch the minutes tick away.

That wrath really is a powerful ability, considering you had this second use available to you. I'm concerned you held onto this information and waited for the next opportunity to play this card. ##vote iLikeToSnipe

I doubt that my mason partner will be back in time for the vote, though I do believe we can leave this to chance with a 50/50 shot? Any objections?

To be frank, I am in the camp of "Cat5 has no items and he masoned me so he should be clear". This runs with the notion that Scatter itself is an ability rather than an item, and if he Masoned me then he couldn't have used Scatter in tandem. With Louis' result, I currently feel more comfortable about Cat5 being town although the possibility does remain open that he could have performed the NK as well. My current proposal however is that he cannot have opened the mason with me and scattered in the same night. Someone else must be responsible for the scatter and did it again to Cat5 to keep our suspicions on him.

Although I failed in my action, do you suppose Cat5 may have learned anything about me then? I have not yet revealed ability info or such so would quizzing him amount to anything? I understand he claims he knows the name Scatter from something or someone, so he should have gotten one of two names from me then?

Calling out Cat5's bluff are you? He did claim Scatter was used on him again. If we find no item, then he should be clear given that his ability use should be the Mason action he took on me.

If I am to sit in the "paranoia tells me iLTS is scum" camp, I can see Wrath being a powerful ability for scum to swing the vote in their favor. The question then would be why would it need an intentional teamkill attempt to activate this day ability that now apparently has two uses. Aside from myself, I don't believe any of us have claimed a night action with potential to kill. For reference if it was missed earlier, my roleblock action had the potential to kill myself and my target, which may have very well been the activation that iLTS could have used instead of relying on his teammate to strike him. If I do believe the theory that KY intentionally attacked iLTS, I just find it very hard to see why they would trade BP for extra voting power so early into the game.

I see. My current question would be why Cat5 chose to mason me. Maybe an attempt to coerce me into his camp if he is our remaining scum after all, maybe covering his tracks with the tracker.

Why didn't the gummies go to Cat5 again? That's what reveals abilities or am I mistaken?

On another note, if this is to be true then Scatter can't be yours although fitting as it may have been for your Scrin flavor.

You have mine. Will you wait for Cat5's report or care to share your report now?

Only as much as our masons allow, at least.

Such was my plan anyway, and now that one-shot action is gone.