Jeod

A thought: there were no scum on n1. Sunflower became the first scum. She was blocked on n3. Shade did a delayed kill and became the second scum, and/or now orange has the opportunity to become a scum tonight. This explains the nightkills and lack of. I really think we need to kill verti, but if this is all true then scum will win unless we Lynch one today. ##vote Sunflower Sorry if this lets verti off the hook, but we can’t risk it. And we can’t verify if shade did do a delay kill.

I’m not hosting another game until January probably.

Are you still doing a Halloween game?

Your resignation is more likely to be accepted if you’re on the Lynch table.

If shade did a kill then it means verti was lying about orange being scum. Back to lunching verti. ##vote verti60

Can’t open, write in, and pass in the same night.

I’m not the one you need to convince.

He does tend to be a hypocrite. ##vote orangep47

If you insist on this route, then I propose orange goes first. KY got a guilty on him, we can trust that.

My objective as town is to eliminate all hostile roles. You should be hocdtile by definition since you hand out and encourage killing. If you’re neutral that’s a GM issue.

Who’s “we”?

It won’t. Snipe will be on you and I’ll copy chopbam to get his nk-proof, which would come into play before the kill is resolved.

Let’s see...we have a nk-proof chopbam, a vengeful doctor, an ability copier, a resurrector, and a vanilla. Against two scum, after your demise, I like those odds.

Lol.

Dude you said that you and sunflower were chatting in PM and Irish said that you were being harsh when I said I felt bad for her. That’s it. I asked orange to check on her sometime tonight over it, because she’s a friend and has had anxiety with mafia games before. Drop the crap. If you resign, stop posting and let Irish resolve.

Or he could succeed and KY gets a gun refill. But if Irish accepts this resignation then it won’t be an issue.

Agree to disagree. We can control the scum with our current actions.

It’s both. While true you’ve riled my emotions a bit, it’s also entirely logical and optimal to use a vulnerability on a death-note passing god while we can instead of killing the originator of said vulnerability.

Or a defender of friends and people I’d prefer kept playing mafia.

Maybe their win condition involves eliminating third parties. There’s still no need to be salty right back to the point of game throwing.

That’s what he stated, but he didn’t mention the full details.

*stated

You could resign. Chopbam I see the GM has stayed that third party is vulnerable for one day only, I take advantage of it. I know we have the numbers bc Cat5 has one more revive.

Say what you want, but disrespecting a mafia player outside the game is a big no-no.