Jump to content

Jeod

Forum Game Masters
  • Posts

    9,136
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    81
  • Donations

    5.00 USD 

Everything posted by Jeod

  1. We can't lynch anyone until tension is greater or equal to 60%.
  2. I cannot, because while Nodlied did not clarify my alignment through investigation, I was shown to be American and of innocent status. I am not task force, but I am town (basically means no super power role), and my alignment was understood by most by the end of Day 2. I did not use my ability last night, as you can see from the day post.
  3. Let me put it this way: I've narrowed down our thief to four players, not including my source. Logic dictated the elimination of five players.
  4. In that case, I'll get the ball rolling on one of the suspects. ##investigate Verti60 I will post my list of suspects from the player list once I have confirmation from my source (through Cat5) that it is okay if he is outed.
  5. I have four suspects right now, Cat5, assuming my source contacted you like he said he would try to.
  6. My source has a tracking ability, that should tell you what they found out. I can tell you who is not the thief. I think you need to pay more attention to the game. I'm 100% not scum or third party.
  7. So, shall we try to get everyone to say how many night actions they took or let it rest and change the hypothesis to a theory? I doubt FRAYDO is our assassin, and there still hasn't been a night kill. Thanks to my source, however, I do feel like I can trust TheIrishMan slightly more than I did yesterday.
  8. Four percent rise in tension as opposed to nine this time. Interesting.
  9. For any who are curious, I can confirm what Cat5 said about the vault. Doesn't appear he's left anything out. There's an item locker, an evidence locker, and a truth locker. One who has access to the vault doc can use a pick-up action to pick up either an item or a piece of evidence, but not both during the same night. There is also a transfer action to transfer evidence between the evidence and truth locker. The transfer action can be used multiple times in a single night. I would like a trusted player to access the vault on N3 to confirm if evidence can give additional information if it is picked up. I chose not to pick up the "A Note on the Black Hand" evidence tonight. See you guys in 8 hours.
  10. Gavrilo Princip, perhaps? I think it's safe to assume that FRAYDO may become a warmonger if tension rises enough.
  11. For the record, there is zero mention of my action raising or lowering world tension.
  12. Why ask a question nobody knows the answer to?
  13. Certainly. It's likely flavor. That headline is the legitimate NYT headline: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/17/Headline_of_the_New_York_Times_June-29-1914.jpg
  14. It's touchy because lore isn't as much of a deal in this game (thanks Nodlied). Notice that I haven't changed my vote.
  15. My source just gave me some critical information. I've already chewed him out over not telling me sooner--it seems we have a bit of an absent-minded task force member--but he claims that he is after a single assassin, who murdered the late Duke. Essentially, his victory condition is game-mechanic confirmation that there is currently at least one active scum lurking about. This of course brings more suspicion on FRAYDO, although I must admit it's awfully convenient for my source to have two bits of information that, when put together, strongly implicate FRAYDO. Anyway, do with it what you will.
  16. Not sure why you think Mojo would have evidence over Irish. Retaliation just confirmed Mojo's little perk as well.
  17. I'm all for it, if only to confirm what you said. It'd be interesting though if whoever we investigate today has a piece of evidence.
  18. Correct, and FRAYDO still has not confirmed or denied it. It's actually pretty important that he does, because if it conflicts with what my source tells me, then we have a lead.
  19. I said Mojo for D3 or D4.
  20. You're more dangerous than Mojoman in terms of scumplay, so I'm more inclined to investigate you next. Simple.
  21. Interesting that you're willing to cooperate so freely with Irish even though he hasn't been proven Town nor investigated himself, nor has he offered to be.
  22. I think it's pathetic that you decided to out such sensitive information in a bid to peg me as Town or Warmonger when my alignment should be clear by now. You're so set on casting doubt on me that you failed to take into account that the objective wording could easily be used to test others. It's a rule breaker to do so, however, but your blind attack only makes me want to investigate you even more.
  23. Oh I understand. In fact, that statement is so obvious even scum could use it. Our objectives were pretty clearly stated in the day posts.
  24. What in particular are you referencing? I think we all believe Cat5 is town by his cooperating and in-depth analysis of the evidence locker and how it might work. His analysis made mention of things that would help town make better nominations--not something scum would want.
×
×
  • Create New...