Jump to content

OrangeP47

Forum Game Masters
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    11,352

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    23

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

 Content Type 

Everything posted by OrangeP47

  1. OrangeP47
    Yeah but he didn't update the starting post, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
  2. OrangeP47
    I mean really though, you can make mafia out of just about anything if you try hard enough.
  3. OrangeP47
    I've only read the first four books and it's so long ago I don't really remember what happened in them.
  4. OrangeP47
    Hufflepuff?
  5. OrangeP47
    Well I guess he did say there may be secret things, so it's possible. I wouldn't know where to begin with that though.
  6. OrangeP47
    Your powers of deduction are simply astounding
  7. OrangeP47
    I mean, if the 1st rebellion is defeated, the next rebellion is, by definition, the SECOND rebellion...
  8. OrangeP47
    ????
  9. OrangeP47
    Knowing us, I'm fairly confident we can make WIN hit max before then
  10. OrangeP47
    Which I mean, isn't ideal, but I'm willing to accept it because he implied there was some sort of system for it rather than it being purely random.
  11. OrangeP47
    Verti said if no one rebels people are compelled to rebel.
  12. OrangeP47
    Oh, I see the issue. I don't think we reelect the king if the rebels are defeated. Rather, everyone gets the option to start a new rebellion.
  13. OrangeP47
    I assume we're all trying to end the game as King as part of a personal win condition or something that's not stated. It's hard for me to put into words, in part because I didn't sleep well last night and can't muster my usual brain power, but just because we're loyal now doesn't mean we're always loyal. I mean, several of us, while claiming to be loyalists, have openly admitted to half-assing it, yourself included.
  14. OrangeP47
    That's actually a decent question. I would assume we're not allowed to vote the king to trial, but I don't think Verti technically made a rule about it.
  15. OrangeP47
    Regardless, we still have the WIN to deal with rebels or no, so the game wouldn't be over.
  16. OrangeP47
    Though is that your point? That that shouldn't be the case?
  17. OrangeP47
    Look at what you quoted. It DOES say once the rebels are defeated. Apparently, once they are defeated, people get to decide if they want to rebel again, or something.
  18. OrangeP47
    I guess it probably should say when the rebels OR royals are defeated, but honestly, I guess the rebels *could* pick off indies if they wanted to. From a GM perspective I'd argue they'd be allowed to do that. From a "is this a smart thing to do as rebels" perspective, I'd argue it's pretty dumb though, so they won't. See my comments last night regarding the fact that rebels want to usurp not destroy. This is of course assuming indies rejoin the normal flow of things upon one faction being defeated, which I see as likely. I see that whole process as more or less certain individuals having the opportunity to "step aside" and not go down with the ship if the King wants to pull a scorched earth.
  19. OrangeP47
    I mean, he has the fourth highest postcount on the forums and he's only been here like a year.
  20. OrangeP47
    Shade is many things, but afk is never one of them.
  21. OrangeP47
    I'm pretty sure on religion no matter what anybody does, a large section of the player base is going to be unhappy, so we're just going to have to deal with it.
  22. OrangeP47
    I wish Cat 5 was playing this game
  23. OrangeP47
    Shade frequently makes too many assumptions, and as a result has no idea what he's talking about. Unfortunately, that's not alignment indicitive. I offer the alternative theory that many of us want to build up our own resources, and figured we'd be safer doing that under the "protection" of the royalist banner, rather than joining the rebels where we'd likely have to expend what little we started with.
  24. OrangeP47
    No comment on Irish for now, but I do hope he does work when he gets here. Same goes for PrettyReckless. I've already laid out why no lynch is not the greatest idea, and other implications, but I feel like after a certain point it's just yelling into the void For now, it's bed time. Don't go too crazy while I'm away
  25. OrangeP47
    That really has nothing to do with my point and really is just semantics about terms I didn't even touch on.
×
×
  • Create New...