Shade939

Unless we want to go ahead and see about getting rid of ChopBam, I think trying to find whoever infected Nodlied would be the easiest thing to try and do today given the much smaller suspect pool.

Ok, I managed to ninja you before you could bring up that point.

Based on what?

Unless someone used an item instead, in which case I think that the item would be the focus of their character so they probably wouldn't have a very good role ability to use alongside it.

Or in short, Category 5, Orange and Killing_You are all the most likely players to have infected Nodlied at the moment.

So, here's a good question, how many players could have infected Nodlied with a virus last night if he was actually infected?

Tell me about it, blocking a player also prevents them from using any investigative or protective abilities that they might have to try and prove their innocence.

Or a hostile player doesn't use a hostile action one night and the entire count is wrong...

For example, let's assume that we only have three hostile players in games, one scum, ChopBam, and whoever is using the virus. So there's a max of 3 hostile actions in a night. Now, let's say we roleblock scum, but both ChopBam and the virus player use a hostile action still. That was 2 actions and nothing to accuse scum of so far. The next night, we roleblock ChopBam, Scum and Virus use a hostile action, based on what happened previous Scum and ChopBam have now been cleared of being hostile players, and we have to assume their's another unknown hostile in game still that we havne't seen use a hostile ability yet despite having proof that they had to have used it...

It's a bit of a flawed plan without knowing the maximum number of hostile players in game to start with.

For some reason, I don't think it works as well when even scum know about the plan...

Or to be more precise, the number of hostiles who have acted in what time frame? Actually, that's probably a pointless question, but you'd have a fairly weak ability if that was a number of hostiles who have acted across the entire game sort of ability.

Are you certain about that?

In Irish's case, if he actually gives away any information it'll be pretty obvious what the ability is...

You might want to duck Retaliation...

I do have to agree I would be much happier if someone would use a day killing ability on him in this case.

Yeah, I can understand why Retaliation is phrasing it like that if he was also roleblocked.

Given the fact that we didn't have a NK tonight, I'm a bit more inclined to go after a third party than I would be otherwise.

Not immediately, but now he has to actually use that ability in the future and we can act on the information he provides finding any inconsistencies with his statement and what actually happens.

And that is a reasonable way of allowing us to figure out if you're telling the truth about your character without having to kill your character. ##Unvote

You know Retaliation, you'd be a lot less suspicious if you actually tried explaining your role and could actually prove the reason why we didn't have a NK wasn't simply because you couldn't actually act last night?

It is an odd situation, with the exception of Nodlied it doens't really appear like anyone was targeted with a Scum ability.

Or maybe not, some clarification might help out here @Sunflower.

Actually, never mind about him not even trying to use one of his abilities last night. I thought Sunflower had said she had role blocked him and he didn't' use any abilities, but I can't find where she mentioned that after going through her past post today?

Yeah, he seems to have completely given up on defending himself after yesterday, or even trying to use one of his abilities last night...