Jump to content

Shade939

Forum Game Masters
  • Posts

    8,419
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    17
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

Everything posted by Shade939

  1. Unfortunately not, it's a bit more complicated that assuming someone else wasn't targeted instead. In which case I was targeted with a particularly weird ability instead I'd attribute to Retalation.
  2. Actually, rereading that and considering that we didn't have a NK, I think I can actually say I was targeted by four separate players. And yeah, it's fairly obvious what at leas two of those abilities did which are definitely pro-town, the fourth one and lack of a NK is the one I think scum might have targeted me with.
  3. Also, I am very irritated at at least one of those players who I'm pretty certain is trying to get me killed...
  4. So, I was targeted by at least three players last night, one of which threw a pie in my face...
  5. Well, simply put, one way or another I expect the best way to resolve this situation is to wait for morning when I can see if i'm still alive or not.
  6. I put him at around 25% suspicious, as compared to Retaliation at around 75%. And my vote was basically going to guaranteed either 100% NoLynch or a 50% Lynch on Fraydo, and you can't say anyone said they wanted a NoLynch until after I had already voted..
  7. You don't have to if you do a decent enough job to alleviate my suspicions the first time. ##Fraydo
  8. There we go, I was about to comment about how the situation was different.
  9. Actually, I think Retaliation voted himself up for the early hammer to be precise.
  10. To an extent, it's where Scum flipped Retaliations investigative ability to get a town member lynched, so Killing_You voted for Retaliation the next day and scum jumped on it for an early hammer and game win.
  11. If he did I missed the reference, or possibly shouldn't have gotten it in the first place?
  12. Well, it's pretty obvious Retaliation isn't getting voted up yet, but I think this situation will be very useful for gathering information depending on how it plays out if I leave my vote where it currently is.
  13. Also, wouldn't the more relevant example be where Irish voted up Voe on day two with a second vote preventing him from possibly dying D1 when he was Scum?
  14. Except for your previous vote pattern is quite incriminating still...
  15. Assuming you don't just vote up FRAYDO at the last moment now...
  16. Which I think Retaliation had actually managed to do multiple times now, as opposed to the single incriminating comment from Fraydo...
  17. I did very specifically say unless players actually do something to incriminate themselves...
  18. Not much to decide on at the moment without having any actual abilities to use. In Retaliations case he's basically acting like we'd expect a Mafia player to act in his situation.
  19. Also, since FRAYDO now has two votes on him, and because of that we'd need at least two votes on Retaliation also. ##Vote Retaliation
  20. To be fair to FRAYDO, given what times he's usually on is he even going to be here before hammer?
×
×
  • Create New...