The differences between TP and NP roles is that the objective for TP roles are designed to harm everyone while the objectives for NP roles are designed to be just that, an additional objective that are not supposed to harm any one side.
Honestly, I haven't seen any change to my role, nor did I receive anything regarding possible experimentation in my night result PM. So unless I don't know about any experimentation, I'd say that Orange's claim is legitimate.
I voted for Jeod (for shits and giggles due to the lack of Voe and Fraydo) and then for you to pressure you into answering my question, which at the time, had a good reason for being asked. That said, the reason I haven't voted for you today is because I'm thinking about the possibility of town countering town as a balancing prospect.
Whether or not I've asked anybody a question isn't what is important. Questions are only part of the game. I've already cast suspicion on Verti and iLTS yesterday for their behaviour and, at the time, really itchy gameplay claims. The question just applies to you. I asked you a questions about your behaviour, and I haven't gotten a satisfying answer. That's the reason I wanted to pressure you.
When visiting.
Yes you are. I myself was too busy scoring draws against Orks today.
Oh but I have given hints. Two of them even.
Eh, what. I have a completely null read on Cat5. He simply hasn't been able to be active enough for me to decide on anything.
Yes actually. iLTS and Verti on D1. The only reason I went after you was because of you refusal to answer my question in a satisfying manner.
No. However, I think that it is interesting to believe that I'm hostile towards you when I just want you answer a question that you've been avoiding. That said, if counters are on different teams, then I'd be more inclined to take a better look at you and iLTS.
An inability on your part to either provide a truthful answer or simply admit that you made a mistake at that point in time (if it even is) is an ever bigger problem.
Answer my question first. Then I'll answer yours.
Fair enough. However, so far we have two pairs. So it is something that we might want to explore nevertheless.