Jump to content

Killing_You

Staff Moderators
  • Posts

    4,478
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    122
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

Everything posted by Killing_You

  1. Oh so now you go back to saying that it failed because FRAYDO was jailed? Stick to one story at a time.
  2. Now it sounds like you're just stretching the facts to fit your little scenarios rather than taking an objective look at the playing field. Speaking of which, let's examine the night actions in a little more detail. Confirmed by FRAYDO and ChopBam. Confirmed by his result being accurate. GM confirmed. Confirmed by Choppy and Nodlied, who also targeted us. Confirmed by me, since it got redirected to me. Confirmed because Orange's ability ignored the bus and hit me. Confirmed by me and Jeod's inventory reveal. Technically blocked, but confirmed by me. Unconfirmed. Hmm... I think this reads crystal clear to me. ##vote Verti60
  3. Killing You-> Jail-> FRAYDO OrangeP47-> Cop-> KY Jeod-> Died Shade939-> Bus-> Jeod/KY Nodlied-> Mason-> Jeod Category 5 Hurricane-> Buff-> Orange ChopBam-> Blacksmith-> Jeod/KY FRAYDO-> Buff(?)-> Orange Verti60-> Track-> FRAYDO Those are the night actions that I see. And most of them are confirmed. And this contradicts the fact that I did block him, which leads me to conclude that SOMEONE ELSE did the nightkill. And it's funny that you're approaching this angle when you claim to have tracked FRAYDO, so if I didn't block him, and he did indeed do the kill, don't you think you would've seen it?
  4. No, I'm hinting that I blocked the wrong person, and someone who is not FRAYDO did the nightkill. How are you coming to these conclusions?
  5. Nah, the killer tried to target me. I also don't think it was a delayed kill. I think I failed to block the NK.
  6. I'm not a fan of this. I'm neutral, so I'd be fine, but not in the #2 seat. And if Orange's result on Cat5 is accurate, I'd guess he's TP with his own set of objectives. We should probably- no definitely- focus on finding the last scum.
  7. Why do you care? As I've said, I could win if town played a perfect game, and the reason I'm forthcoming with this info is because the only thing I have to do now is survive.
  8. Gathering souls, no, since it's a passive. Keeping them, on the other hand, might pose an issue. If someone attacks me at night, for example, boom-that's two souls out the window. And if I use my day ability to confirm my alignment, boom- three gone. I also imagine I would've had to compete with iLTS, but that's not an issue anymore.
  9. Difference is, none of my actions that are fueled by souls pose any threat to anyone.
  10. *ahem* Not quite the same objective, just different uses for the same item.
  11. Holy me, you seem nettled by this revelation. Not to worry, it's not Ragnarok or anything like that, although to answer your questions I suppose this warrants a full claim. Pleased to meet you all, I am Hades, Lord of the Underworld. My objective is to survive this game while holding at least one soul. How do I gather souls? Passively, of course, as I just fish them out of the River Styx, as they float on by whenever a player dies. Doesn't matter what player, though, so Town could play a perfect game and I'd win. Conversely, Scum could play a perfect game and I'd still win. So long as I was alive, of course. In fact, I think this is what my roleblock was intended for. Did you catch iLTS's "gather souls" passive? He was a direct competitor to me, and with him eliminated, I don't seem to have anyone who can get in my way. Now, souls don't just count towards my win condition, they also power my two other abilities. At two souls, I have enough to charge my night BP status (so yeah, I'm safe for the night), and at three, I have a one-shot day ability that removes my vote for that day while also revealing my alignment. I have a feeling I won't need that, since I can win alongside Town in the event of a perfect game, and I'm more than willing to help with the scumhunt. So that's the first and third questions answered. As for the second, I think it might also guard them from harm, as it's technically a jailer action.
  12. There's more people than just Cat5, you know. I can't tell you who did it, but I can tell you that FRAYDO didn't.
  13. Personally, I'm of the mindset that Cat5 is likely TP and currently not a threat. I don't think he's scum, though.
  14. Alright, night report inc. Feel free to correct me if I missed anything. First things first, my target last night was @FRAYDO, mostly since he was pushing on the scenario that I was scum who hit a BP iLTS, and not considering the other possibility (me blocking iLTS). Guess I owe you an apology, bud Also, I did receive a thing, so I'm guessing it was from @ChopBam. Not armor, but something. Probably best not to disclose that info, though. @OrangeP47's cop result on me is correct, and I believe he is sane. That's right, gods and goddesses, I'm neutral. And before you go speculating on my win condition or whatever, I'll go ahead and let you know that it was met when iLTS died, so I'm more than happy to scumhunt with you guys.
  15. Oh, awesome! I was actually starting to piece together a scenario where Verti was a scum player taking advantage of the circumstances and trying really hard to get iLTS killed after learning he was nightkill immune, but hey, getting scum is always better. And I'd say this clears both Verti and Orange. Anyway, have a nice night, everyone. Looking forward to D3.
  16. Hey guys, apologies for the staggered absence, been a busy weekend. I don't think I'll have a chance to check in before hammer at this point. Following the plan, it looks like we're sitting at 4 iLTS, and 3 Shade. One more for iLTS and we're good to go. ##vote iLikeToSnipe
  17. Can't go into a ton of detail at the moment since I'm at a friend's house and on a tablet rather than my computer, but based on iLTS's chart, I'd say Group 1 Set 2 is true, since it would line up better with Orange's cop report. Also, my vote on iLTS was closer to an attempt to stir up discussion and draw attention to that set of circumstances than a full confidence "he's scum" vote. I'll keep an eye on the conversation, but don't expect a whole lot from me today. ##unvote
  18. It seems iLTS and I are at an impasse here. I visited him, he did nothing. Neither of us seem to have gotten any other visitors. And he's immune to NKs. Really, we can't do anything that isn't some variation of "no u." If we're going to use Orange's ability to check one of us, I personally wouldn't mind being in the #1 spot.
  19. Well, if you guys will excuse me, I'm just going to place my vote real quick and then let you guys get back to... whatever this is. K? K. ##voteiLikeToSnipe
  20. Cat5 made a pretty decent case on him D1: This'd be better if the posts he was referencing showed up in the quote as well, but forum eats those for some reason.
  21. Uhh... guys... Is anyone else curious about the fact that the guy who got blocked on the night with no kill is claiming to have no action in a CYOR game? Same guy who was accusing Jeod of spreading confusion about his alignment when Jeod was actually laying tidbits of his role for people to jump on? Same guy who dayblocked Jeod the second he made a minor threat to kill someone, and later said he wasn't going to block Jeod unless he was certain he killed a townie? ...Bueller?
  22. iLTS, I'd personally like to know what you would've done had I not blocked you, just out of friendly curiosity.
  23. Wasn't my first choice, but I'll take it. Also I could only dayblock last game, and now I can only nightblock
×
×
  • Create New...