Guest thepcman Posted February 3, 2010 Report Posted February 3, 2010 I don't have a mac; that's a screenshot of thepcman watching a video I made on youtube. Erm.. So... Is the kirov gonna have 2000HP? If so, then it will be seriously OPed
Guest Glaed Posted February 3, 2010 Report Posted February 3, 2010 (edited) Erm.. So... Is the kirov gonna have 2000HP? If so, then it will be seriously OPed Just because the kirov had that much health in a test video don't mean anything. They haven't put it ingame and balance tested it, so nothing involving its health is final. And the health/armor number is only half the story, because there is also a setting for what type of health/armor the unit has. The kirov could easily have 2000 health and lose it all in one shot from a patriot missile for all any of us non-staff have seen of it. Edited February 3, 2010 by Glaed
OWA Posted February 3, 2010 Author Report Posted February 3, 2010 Erm.. So... Is the kirov gonna have 2000HP? If so, then it will be seriously OPed The w3d engine works with health values and armour types. The health values determines how much physical health a unit has and the armour type determines what weapons will do the most (or least) damage vs that unit. This way, you could have a terror drone that is invincible to cannon-type weapons, heals from tesla weapons, but is really weak against prism beams. It's a really nice system for doing armour types if you ask me. If you want to know more, take a look at Renegade/APB's armor.ini
Guest thepcman Posted February 4, 2010 Report Posted February 4, 2010 The w3d engine works with health values and armour types. The health values determines how much physical health a unit has and the armour type determines what weapons will do the most (or least) damage vs that unit. This way, you could have a terror drone that is invincible to cannon-type weapons, heals from tesla weapons, but is really weak against prism beams. It's a really nice system for doing armour types if you ask me. If you want to know more, take a look at Renegade/APB's armor.ini OK, thank you! but lets hope you don't "balance" it untile it can be shot down by 2 IFVs and that allies acheally need TEAMWORK, not 1 Good player to bring that thing down!
Guy with a wrench Posted February 4, 2010 Report Posted February 4, 2010 Patriot Missiles, GGI's , Rocketeer's , almost anything can bring down a Kirov given its speed. We have not gotten it in-game but I think the harrier will be the sword that brings down the Kirovs, Air-Air wasn't possible in RA2 but I just don't see why we shouldn't include it here "We have 'em on radar"
Guest Pelikan132 Posted February 4, 2010 Report Posted February 4, 2010 Grizzly is ingame, check a few blogs back. I did and i havent found the answer for the question: Can a soldier take cover in the empty space between the belts os the tank?
rm5248 Posted February 4, 2010 Report Posted February 4, 2010 I did and i havent found the answer for the question: Can a soldier take cover in the empty space between the belts os the tank? Not as far as I know, because the worldbox would prevent it.
moonsense715 Posted February 4, 2010 Report Posted February 4, 2010 Patriot Missiles, GGI's , Rocketeer's , almost anything can bring down a Kirov given its speed. The best AA in RA2 is the Aegis Cruiser, it brings Kirovs down pretty fast, even alone. However Naval units and water must be present on the map for that. I did and i havent found the answer for the question: Can a soldier take cover in the empty space between the belts os the tank? Grizzlies can't take that much damage to stay stationary for infantry covering. They will be using their speed and manuverability to win a combat, so basicly even if infantry could hide there, there are two possibilities: -The driver is an idiot, trying to absorb all the damage it gets with its low health to defend an infantry unit. -You are the idiot, hiding behind the Grizzly, then the driver simple moves away, because he knows he'll die fucking quickly when stationary, then you are left without cover. And as rm pointed it out, worldbox doesn't let you hide there anyway.
Guest Pelikan132 Posted February 4, 2010 Report Posted February 4, 2010 As I watched one of your trailers on youtube I had a thought... who are the lucky testers?
Guest thepcman Posted February 4, 2010 Report Posted February 4, 2010 (edited) As I watched one of your trailers on youtube I had a thought... who are the lucky testers? lol Not me! D: Edited February 4, 2010 by thepcman
Guest Pelikan132 Posted February 4, 2010 Report Posted February 4, 2010 (edited) Do you plan to make an mod add-on with usage of the Yuris Revenge datadisk? It could be interesting with the Battle Fortress... Oops forgot about the GGI and the siege chopper... As I watched one of your trailers on youtube I had a thought... who are the lucky testers? It wont be me right? (Doesnt count testing the first official release) What a dumb thing quoting myself Edited February 4, 2010 by Pelikan132
moonsense715 Posted February 4, 2010 Report Posted February 4, 2010 Do you plan to make an mod add-on with usage of the Yuris Revenge datadisk? It could be interesting with the Battle Fortress... Oops forgot about the GGI and the siege chopper... And Boris and Robot Tanks, Spy Plane and whatever else... as stated both on moddb and the official website: This game features all of the units and structures for the Allied and Soviet sides from both RA2 and the Yuri's Revenge Expansion. Please post non-blog related stuff to the FAQ thread in the General Discussion forums.
Guest Pelikan132 Posted February 4, 2010 Report Posted February 4, 2010 And Boris and Robot Tanks, Spy Plane and whatever else... as stated both on moddb and the official website: Please post non-blog related stuff to the FAQ thread in the General Discussion forums. Robot tanks!!! I want to see that!
Guest thepcman Posted February 5, 2010 Report Posted February 5, 2010 Robot tanks!!! I want to see that! And you will be able to Remoet Control them from the radar (Airforce command)!
OWA Posted February 5, 2010 Author Report Posted February 5, 2010 And you will be able to Remoet Control them from the radar (Airforce command)! You mean Robot Control Centre.
Guest BigCheese256 Posted February 6, 2010 Report Posted February 6, 2010 You mean Robot Control Centre. Hm. What will happen when the Control Centre is destroyed? Do they just turn off, your interface with them just cut or what? Also, what would happen to your Robot Tank if you disconnected your interface to it to repair the Control Centre?
Guy with a wrench Posted February 6, 2010 Report Posted February 6, 2010 Hm. What will happen when the Control Centre is destroyed? Do they just turn off, your interface with them just cut or what? Also, what would happen to your Robot Tank if you disconnected your interface to it to repair the Control Centre? You either become gelatinous in form, or you get turned into soup. I prefer the latter.
Guest thepcman Posted February 6, 2010 Report Posted February 6, 2010 You mean Robot Control Centre. Whoops! The radar was for terror drones Anyways, yeah,yeah whatever
moonsense715 Posted February 6, 2010 Report Posted February 6, 2010 Whoops! The radar was for terror drones Anyways, yeah,yeah whatever Not really, you can have terror drones without a radar (there are a few controllers in the war factory), but you can have more drones with a radar (extra controller terminals).
Guest Pelikan132 Posted February 6, 2010 Report Posted February 6, 2010 Not really, you can have terror drones without a radar (there are a few controllers in the war factory), but you can have more drones with a radar (extra controller terminals). How many of them will be?
Guest theta123 Posted February 6, 2010 Report Posted February 6, 2010 (edited) Why not to use M249 SAW? Better ROF... The FN Minimi has a ROF of 1150 the SAW has 1000 Basicly, the M249 is just a Minimi with a Heatshield and a diffrent stock. But americans insta brand it "AWESOME 100% US designed and made weapon) Same goes with the FN MAG.2-3 small changed, and its branded M240 and pure american And beside, the M249 is only used by the US army. The FN Minimi is used by 21 Countries, with more countries planning to aquire it. I hereby bow, and salute, to the AR dev team, for taking sie FN Minimi wich i suggested. If their is anything i can do to help, you let me know Edited February 6, 2010 by theta123
Guest Pelikan132 Posted February 6, 2010 Report Posted February 6, 2010 The FN Minimi has a ROF of 1150 the SAW has 1000 Basicly, the M249 is just a Minimi with a Heatshield and a diffrent stock. But americans insta brand it "AWESOME 100% US designed and made weapon) Same goes with the FN MAG.2-3 small changed, and its branded M240 and pure american And beside, the M249 is only used by the US army. The FN Minimi is used by 21 Countries, with more countries planning to aquire it. I hereby bow, and salute, to the AR dev team, for taking sie FN Minimi wich i suggested. If their is anything i can do to help, you let me know Good speech, too bad we already solved this
Guest theta123 Posted February 8, 2010 Report Posted February 8, 2010 Good speech, too bad we already solved this oh no we dint
Guest AdrwIvrsn Posted February 8, 2010 Report Posted February 8, 2010 If you are playing as American paratroopers, the model is obviously going to be called a M249 Para, though. Edit: Not officially
Guest Pelikan132 Posted February 11, 2010 Report Posted February 11, 2010 see theta? User was warned for: Low Content Post
Recommended Posts