Jump to content

SarahNautili

Member
  • Posts

    246
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

Posts posted by SarahNautili

  1. On the flip side, the allied barracks being so exposed makes it trivial for the soviets to take it down, and once it's down, well, Hinds can reign supreme due to their main counter being out of commission.

  2. also of interest on APB the map's size is that back in .9935 everything was a hell of a lot shorter range (or at least that's how it feels when I've gone to dig through the old fanmaps lately). Bullet weapons especially. Which would make the dynamic a hell of a lot different. It'd still need a bt of a shrink, and I like chopbam's idea of putting the bases a bit up the coast from the corners, but overall it'd be a hell of a lot more workable now than in .9935. Or Beta.

     

    Also I believe Tunnel APB the map was a beta thing but it was never on the official server or anything. It got made and then... promptly forgotten?

  3. Imagine, then, Mirage Tanks, Sergeants with Riot Shields, a Super Artillery piece superweapon complete with gatling barrels, and a VTOL Badger Bomber, in that order, and you've pretty much got those four things he mentioned down.


    Why are Allies and Soviets fighting over a piece of glacier anyway?

     

    I miss TheWoodToday and Metro

     

    "fjord" usually describes terrain in one of two places: Iceland, and Norway. Neither of these are places the Allies would want the Soviets to have a base. Both of these are places the Soviets would really, really want a base, especially if once they got established they started setting up Submarine Pens, Airfields, and Missile Silos nearby. Easy access to the entire northern coast of Europe? Heck yeah. And the reverse is definitely true of Norway for the Allies. An airbase there would give them access to most of northern Russia, including Moscow itself.

×
×
  • Create New...