Games [GAME OVER] CYOR VI

[iLikeToSnipe]

Just now, OrangeP47 said:

Except we have 4 confirmed/claimed neutrals/TPs

I half expect Shade to flip Town.

[OrangeP47]

Just now, iLikeToSnipe said:

I half expect Shade to flip Town.

What a galaxy brain move that'd be.

[Category5]

1 minute ago, OrangeP47 said:

Except we have 4 confirmed/claimed neutrals/TPs

Well, yeah, which would mean most of the neutral claims are lies. Which would be totally shocking, right?

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Category 5 Hurricane said:

Well, yeah, which would mean most of the neutral claims are lies. Which would be totally shocking, right?

I'm just saying... 6 town... 2 dead... 

[Retaliation]

1 minute ago, iLikeToSnipe said:

I half expect Shade to flip Town.

Didn't you dismiss the idea that town would claim neutral earlier?

[iLikeToSnipe]

Just now, OrangeP47 said:

I'm just saying... 6 town... 2 dead... 

Gotta lynch that neutral! 

[Category5]

Putting her quote in context, she was saying 2v2v2v6 at a time when Killng_You and iLTS were the neutral claims and Shade hadn't claimed neutral yet. 

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Retaliation said:

Didn't you dismiss the idea that town would claim neutral earlier?

!

[iLikeToSnipe]

Just now, Retaliation said:

Didn't you dismiss the idea that town would claim neutral earlier?

I don't think town would claim neutral. But I jokingly suspect Shade would.

[OrangeP47]

Just now, OrangeP47 said:

!

I'm so glad this forum doesn't have minimum character counts for posts.

[OrangeP47]

1 minute ago, Category 5 Hurricane said:

Putting her quote in context, she was saying 2v2v2v6 at a time when Killng_You and iLTS were the neutral claims and Shade hadn't claimed neutral yet. 

Wow that's quite the tell then.

[iLikeToSnipe]

1 minute ago, OrangeP47 said:

!

Shade is the exception to every rule out guideline.

[Category5]

Hey, I mean if town can't lynch neutrals and mafia has no reason to kill them, claiming neutral is what you should do in any situation, amirite?

[Category5]

Just claim neutral no matter what and then bitch and moan when people lynch you for "no reason". Win Mafia Championships with that strat.

[iLikeToSnipe]

59 minutes ago, iLikeToSnipe said:

I mean, if you want to get into meta/WIFOM arguments like that, why would I do that as mafia? There would be ample opportunities for me to blend in as town. However, that's bad for me as a neutral that needs to survive. If I pretend to be town and mafia believe it, that makes me an NK target.

In other words, I have every reason to claim neutral if I really am neutral or if I'm TP pretending to be neutral. I would only claim town if I was town or mafia. I'm only on your list to lynch right now because I've chosen to act this way. This isn't a case of "subverting expectations". Claiming mafia and saying "lynch me!" as mafia would be totally against my meta and "subverting expectations". It'd also be completely idiotic.

Context. Never said town wouldn't claim neutral.

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Category 5 Hurricane said:

Just claim neutral no matter what and then bitch and moan when people lynch you for "no reason". Win Mafia Championships with that strat.

If there's ever a closed setup year I might do it for the memes, I'm well known enough now I can get away with it as long as I recant by D2.

[iLikeToSnipe]

Just now, Category 5 Hurricane said:

Just claim neutral no matter what and then bitch and moan when people lynch you for "no reason". Win Mafia Championships with that strat.

You're free to assume that everything follows a meta or set of strict rules. I'm not going to complain if you lynch me. I'm just giving you the straight truth of what will happen.

[Retaliation]

4 minutes ago, iLikeToSnipe said:

I don't think town would claim neutral. But I jokingly suspect Shade would.

I think he obliquely talked about that D1. I thought he was trying to imply he was neutral, but maybe not.

[iLikeToSnipe]

By all means, keep on focusing on the player who has acted in their own interests and been open about their role and alignment. Pay no attention to all the other players who contribute nothing and try to stay out of the spotlight.

[iLikeToSnipe]

Besides, if you want to go purely by my meta then I'm definitely not mafia. Why would I give up control of the vote and just sit back as mafia? But am I suddenly mafia because I wouldn't do that as mafia? Strictly applying my meta I am either neutral or TP.

If you believe otherwise, then let's talk. At this point you're just pushing for a lynch you know doesn't help town.

[Category5]

1 minute ago, iLikeToSnipe said:

If you believe otherwise, then let's talk. At this point you're just pushing for a lynch you know doesn't help town.

Ok. Start talking about your mafia suspects then.

[iLikeToSnipe]

Just now, Category 5 Hurricane said:

Ok. Start talking about your mafia suspects then.

Give me protection. Then I talk. I know you don't have an action to protect me, but I'm sure somebody does. Work to get me that night protection and I'm 100% on your side. Deal?

[OrangeP47]

ILTS, if you're neutral, why did you flip out about Shade's so called experiment?  

[iLikeToSnipe]

Just now, OrangeP47 said:

ILTS, if you're neutral, why did you flip out about Shade's so called experiment?  

Cause I'm used to him having a day big and using it on a whim. I die, I lose.

[OrangeP47]

Just now, iLikeToSnipe said:

Cause I'm used to him having a day big and using it on a whim. I die, I lose.

I mean it seemed to me to be more like an alignment test sort of implication.

[Retaliation]

2 minutes ago, iLikeToSnipe said:

Give me protection. Then I talk. I know you don't have an action to protect me, but I'm sure somebody does. Work to get me that night protection and I'm 100% on your side. Deal?

How do you feel about chocolate?

[iLikeToSnipe]

Just now, OrangeP47 said:

I mean it seemed to me to be more like an alignment test sort of implication.

Bottom line is, I trust Shade to try a gambit that is unpredictable and leads to results that aren't what he claims will happen. So... I did not (and still don't) trust that he has any kind of alignment test.

[iLikeToSnipe]

Just now, Retaliation said:

How do you feel about chocolate?

I'm not allergic to it and it's quite tasty.

[OrangeP47]

Just now, iLikeToSnipe said:

Bottom line is, I trust Shade to try a gambit that is unpredictable and leads to results that aren't what he claims will happen. So... I did not (and still don't) trust that he has any kind of alignment test.

I mean, purely fatal actions aren't generally his meta, even when they are fatal, they generally have a gimmick or rng, and I say that as someone that got pwnt by lucario.

[iLikeToSnipe]

Just now, OrangeP47 said:

I mean, purely fatal actions aren't generally his meta, even when they are fatal, they generally have a gimmick or rng, and I say that as someone that got pwnt by lucario.

Even so, I have no reason to play along with that and take any risks with him.