iLikeToSnipe

How convenient for you. What's your reasoning for that? (i.e. how is this the "only" way to win?)

Not even mafia is that coordinated.

It's highly unlikely scum would make two fake roleclaims on D1 (if they did, they're idiots). But I do believe one of these (at least) is fake. You're already my top scum pick today, so I'm voting you.

I don't believe both of these could be true, either Orange or Mojo has to be scum. Of those two, my suspicion is solidly on Mojo due to his vote and reasons against Louis and his threats. ##vote Mojoman

I do think Mojo is pretty suspicious for what he's done. Orange isn't far behind him, but that's for his claim and not for his action. I was considering shooting Mojo before he threatened to shoot me. That threat was what sealed the deal for me.

True. But that's just what mafia wants us to think... going against meta is meta.

So Mojoman came up with it for you in the scum doc?

Let a rifleman show you how it's done.

If you're going to threaten me... @Killing_You ##shoot Mojoman

Why does that matter? You could be toxin trooper, hijacker, spy, or some mystery role. You're still acting scummy.

I'm pretty sus of Mojo right now, almost at the point where I'd be willing to vote for him D1 (we have a lot more players). Not seeing a link between him and Shade though.

I didn't say anything about shooting people being good or bad. All I pointed out was you were making some pretty big assumptions and treating them as fact. You responding with another false assumption/statement (that I'm advocating for people to shoot others) makes me much more suspicious of you.

I don't buy your logic there. Your first part is a reason to be suspicious of someone and likely push a lynch on them. But the second one reads like a fake, logical conclusion (don't know the term for it). It's really not a conclusion to reach without making a lot of assumptions ("they didn't care about their shot", "they're not smart town", etc). This reads like you're trying to be an opportunist and doesn't sit well with me. That's also assuming KY hasn't tweaked those roles. It is an interesting, but risky, test though.

What's your reasoning behind that? And this seems to be the shortest goofing around in a mafia game yet lol ##unvote

Try harder, scum

Sustaining your body so you stay alive seems like you're trying hard

So... you have a chance to shoot somebody, miss, and be able to shoot again on the next day? (i.e. don't get stuck, kill doesn't hit)

Are you saying every time Orange was scum he had to eat? wtf... such an obvious play ##vote OrangeP47

OrangeP47 isn't dedicating every waking moment to mafia? Obvious scum tell.

She told me to say, they mean nothing me.

Awaiting orders.

I don't expect to have time for a game until next year, if at all. Probably going to be running a Pathfinder or DnD game, so that'll take up what would have been any time I'd have for planning/running a mafia game.

That all sounds really cool. I've been thinking of how it would all work on a technical level, what I have in mind would allow all of that and a lot more. If anyone is interested in contributing or learning software development as part of it, I can create a thread to get this organized. I just don't really have the time to get it done in a timely manner.

If I were to have the time, I would like to make a forum game server. Implement a basic forum like we have here, but add in what's effectively a game engine. What that could allow for is running games where you get a randomly generated, anonymous pseudonym. You could try and figure out who is who by post style still, but you wouldn't know for sure who a person is. Not sure if I'll be able to do that for a long while though, been asked to help with another open source project.

The ones I'm used to work much better face to face. I don't like designing mafia games where at least one person is going to be out of the game and camping in the dead doc within the first 48 hours. But I don't see how to solve that without creating even more issues.