Jump to content

Category 5 Hurricane

VIPs
  • Posts

    5,037
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    34
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

Everything posted by Category 5 Hurricane

  1. In one of the Championship games, during LYLO, a player tricked the automatic GM system by spelling a players name incorrectly "Yetl" instead of "Yeti". The scum player in this game immediately pounced on the vote thinking he won the game. When the game didn't end, the both town players figured out what happened and thusly won the game. Most players on the site considered it an illegal move and wanted the town victory annulled and the player removed from the competition. I feel that in a game of deception, voting tricks are one of the few tricks town has, and scum need to be careful about jumping on something when being incorrect about it would mean certain loss.
  2. I shouldn't say biggest. I mean, most likely. The biggest problems you might run into would involve a massive outcry against a perceived illegal move involving a fake-vote-trap or something similar.
  3. Having watched several of the Mafia Universe Championship games, I think the biggest perils one can expect to run into there are the fact that people make a billion posts, and sometimes people react in very unexpected ways to things that you might think are normal, just because what they are used to doing on their home sites is different. I've seen heated arguments over very basic mafia concepts.
  4. I'd have to actually wipe out an entire town to match him.
  5. Yes, same place as before. They're holding an exhibition game for backups who didn't sub in during the actual championship games.
  6. I'll enter this game to help with the player count. I will warn straight away, though, that the amount of effort I can put in will be low, because I'm also entering a Mafia Championship Exhibition game.
  7. I should be available, but one of you guys might need to ping me to get my attention. I might forget about it, but I should be home.
  8. Oh, chat mafia isn't a show-up-and-play deal? In that case, there's a good chance I will be around for this one.
  9. It isn't a mafia game if I'm not yelling at VERTi60 over something.
  10. I greatly enjoyed this setup. Indeed, a setup where is was possible for town to win without anyone being killed is fascinating. While I can see the complaints from the scum about being underpowered, I would counter that anti-town combined for a total of 40%, and things would have been a whole hell of a lot different if OrangeP47 was not hostile when he was investigated. We'd eventually crossed the 60% marker with none of the anti-town members actually removed from the game. Scum was in a bad position because of the correct actions of town (invalid as they were) and there isn't a whole lot a GM can do to balance things when town uses so many of it's chances to stop scum correctly.
  11. "This whole game so far is “Town is right but for ALL the wrong reason”." Quote of the game right there. Pretty much everything the town ever got right, was for invalid reasons. That's impressive.
  12. If you will not accept conditional votes, do ##voteinvestigate VERTi60
  13. Nodlied, I have to leave for work now but will not be back until 5 hours after hammer. Please accept these conditional votes: If World Tension is higher than 80% ##voteinvestigate VERTi60 Else, ##votelynch FRAYDO
  14. And I just finished saying that it may be inappropriate to draw conclusions from who was holding evidence, but you jus straight ignored me again.
  15. FRAYDO can't mess with evidence as long as Retaliation is alive.
  16. CK's evidence removed only 10 points from the board when it was stolen from me as I moved it out of the truth box. If we use the 16-point indicator to determine truth, then Chaos's was not.
  17. We also have the issue of evidence that moved around. The piece that was found on OrangeP47 didn't come from him originally. I might not be appropriate to draw conclusions on evidence based on who was holding it.
  18. FRAYDO's piece was true. CK's was false. Go back to the drawing board, detective.
  19. "What would be the good locking retal?" I dunno, asshole, I'm was quoting you, so why don't you ask your past self why you said that?! You've apparently forgotten what you were talking about when you said that and have inserted an unrelated fantasy argument instead as some absurd method of defense. So what I'm going to do is go to bed. Maybe by then you'll remember why you said what you did and then can explain why your position has changed. Because afterall, that is the question I asked, and you didn't answer it. Why were you okay with it then, but aren't now? Nowhere did I ever say I was suspicious about Retal for any reason!
  20. This is when you were ok with investigating someone else who is hostile to reduce WT. What has changed between then and now that makes you think this isn't viable?
  21. So what kind of message did you get for your original night PM from Voe, and how was it changed when Nodlied fixed it?
  22. Even in the worst possible case, town doesn't lose upon your investigation. All items are confiscated, WT is lowered 10% taking us back down to 61%. It's possible that someone has hidden evidence on you, so maybe we'll find some this time. That's puts town in an actually rather comfortable position compared to where we are now. So I continue to ask, why are you using so much aggression to avoid an investigation when all other town-sided players are all "Meh, that's fine"?
  23. Why did you spend all day threatening people with a gun you can't fire?
  24. Why were you ok with investigating Retaliation to lower World Tension but aren't ok doing the same with yourself?
  25. Why do you continue to act as if you're backed into a corner and will lose if investigated?
×
×
  • Create New...