iLikeToSnipe

Yeah, I'd only be selective in my kills as mafia if I thought a neutral would side with me to win. Otherwise it's just killing the biggest threat or killing a person to try and make something specific happen. There's really no "town hunting" as mafia.

Why would somebody be focusing on finding town players if they aren't town?

This is true no matter what Shade's alignment is.

When everyone's sus, nobody's sus.

Sure sucks in mafia when people do that.

I never make bad plays as town.

As is tradition.

Just so nobody wastes their time planning on pushing a lynch for me tomorrow, I'm gonna be lynchproof then too.

I'm gonna have some bad news for you tomorrow Shade...

Somebody needs to setup a Mafia: Gambit Edition game.

Irishman is sus

Eh, people need to learn to adjust their playstyle. Especially if they're town, this is a team game if you're town or mafia. I like gambits, they're pretty fun when you're the one pulling them off. But don't try to pull off a gambit for the sake of pulling off a gambit, do it for your team. And play for your team when doing it.

I will always be suspicious of Shade. Suspicious that he is scum and making a gambit or suspicious that he is town and making a gambit.

I'd have to go back and reread your posts at some point just to be sure. But that wasn't quite the impression I got. It seemed more that you weren't committing to that. It seemed you were saying that Shade was acting suspicious, but he was also acting like town?

Nitpicking is alive.

We have entered... The Mafia Zone.

Agreed, I hate D1 where it's just memeing. I do think we have fallen into the pattern of first half is just memes and shitposting, then something happens and the latter half has some actual discussion.

Now you're just tunneling. Do you want me to just rephrase everything you've said so I don't "plagiarize" you? I've been watching and he is suspicious for how he is kind of backing Shade but also kind of calling him suspicious. I guess I can't have that suspicion since you've already stated it.

That's where we differ. I can recall a gambit of his (though I don't remember the game) where I think he made a vague claim about what he could do and then he just shot somebody. I don't trust Shade in a gambit, especially when I'm the target. We can agree to disagree there, but that's my position.

I find him suspicious for much the same reasons you do. He's quick to jump around on how he says he sees Shade. It's not enough to determine his alignment, but it's still suspicious. As for you, you also seem quick to "assume" Shade is town for performing that gambit but that he also would/should be lynched if his gambit caused town to die. To me that says you believe he may be town because he tried a gambit, but he probably is scum if his gambit kills town? That's not how you judge gambits. They're called gambits for a reason. I don't think there's a Cat5/Orange scum team, but I'm still suspicious of you both. One of you could be scum. And Shade is Shade. I tested the waters by saying I need to know more about his gambit (knowing that I have an escape route) to see what he'd say. He's not as high on my scum list as either of you, but he's still somebody I'm gonna keep an eye on.

Have fun with that. Cat5, Orange, and Shade are all sus

Because it's coming from Shade. I can't recall the last time a D1/N1/D2 gambit from Shade wasn't potentially dangerous. A "test of character" also implies testing a person's flavor/character. I have no qualms about mine being revealed (I'm pretty sure I've revealed it anyways with my action), but just a reveal of who/what your role is doesn't seem that useful. So why would Shade try to build it up, make it public, etc? I feel there's more to it.

In the context of your arguments it seemed you're assuming he's town. That's why my response is "assuming" he's town. In your opinion only.

I don't care what alignment Shade is, I don't want to die in this game.