iLikeToSnipe

As I've made clear plenty of times, I don't think no lynch on D1 is a good idea in general for town. But there is NEVER EVER a time that an early no lynch on D1 is good; we aren't getting any information whatsoever from a no lynch result and ending early ends discussion early. In general an early vote for anything on D1 is bad for us. Just to be clear, are you saying that Jeod blocking you gives you town cred?

My character is a gurrl.

The only thing that really stood out to me yesterday was Orange talking about an early no lynch. Such a thing on D1 can ONLY benefit scum. Maybe he was joking, but it's the only thing that stood out to me on D1. And as Jeod mentioned, Orange did seem kind of certain that neither Sunflower or Jeod were scum. I'd put Orange at the top of my list right now, I'm honestly not sure who else to put on there, there's not much content to go off of right now. As for the death of Cat5, I would think that was just blind luck on the part of scum. I looked through his posts from D1 and I didn't see anything that would have indicated he was a power role. Scum was probably just targeting one of the MVP town players.

Not dead, just had an extremely busy weekend. I'll see if I can find anything in previous posts tomorrow, but this is always the problem with no lyching. There doesn't look like there's much to go off of from yesterday and we're still in the same boat...

I usually don't change it due to complex meta reasons. I'm lazy.

Hmm... @Shade939 are you purple?

Yep, I'm town.

Now let me read my role PM... :V

Yes.

Sign me up!

I won't be around this Saturday, would be around for a test game on the 8th though.

It's looking like the only day I'll have available in September would be the 8th.

Could I sign up for Brazil? If not, I'd like to take Mexico. Might not be available that day so I won't sign up for a major.

My availability is pretty iffy the next 2-3 weeks, and I know almost nothing about Pokemon.

I had a very tiny sliver of hope. But it's gone just the way I expected. They still have a chance to pull it out of the fire, but I'm not going to hold my breath. I'm fairly certain it also matchmaking that purposely matches you with players who have higher level units every once in a while.

Another thing to note, units were one of three types of rarity. Common -> Rare -> Epic. Each level needs different amounts of cards, the higher the rarity the harder it is to get cards to level them up. EA decided to change the rarity for a few units. They compacted the cards of units that went up a level (i.e. instead of having 20 cards for a rare unit you now have 1 or 2). But they did not expand the number if your rarity went down (i.e. you have 2 epic cards, you now have 2 rare cards). Every decision made in this game so far is meant to hurt players.

Got to the top 50 in the game. I've pretty much stopped playing, just play a match or two each day. The 1.0 patch has pretty much broken the already fragile balance. The economy in-game has been messed up, no matter what you do you find yourself with an excess of resources. Unit balancing is broken. For example, Confessors, an anti-infantry focused infantry unit, can attack a Wolverine, an anti-infantry focused vehicle, and win. Units marked as "strong against vehicles, weak against infantry" completely annihilate infantry. The stats listed on units are wrong or confusing. The ability to buy loot crates with real money has been added, leading to people pouring money into it to have an unstoppable army. If a unit is at least 2 levels beyond yours it can attack a unit of the same type (defenders have a large advantage) and come out with at least half HP. I've played a lot, and I don't have the cards from in-game drops to get a single unit to level 8. I'm already seeing people with level 9 or 10 units, which is only possible from buying crates. I've had an attack buggy 1v1 my scorpion tank and win... Quite a few of the top players are no longer playing or cutting back and EA, of course, is not listening. I loved the gameplay when it wasn't pay to win and the unit balance was better. Now it's just hot garbage.

One reason I was pretty excited to get the radio, wanted to see how that would play out.

I thought there was a very good chance you were a pluralist reformer. So I wanted to reach out to you and pretend to be a pluralist as well with the intention of manipulating a stability crash to start a civil war.

Yeah, was pretty excited to get the radio. Wanted to start a conversation with Orange and setup a way to betray the pluralists and start a civil war. On the topic of Rivals, I've really enjoyed the gameplay. However, the last update let people start spending money on the game to buy crates to unlock cards and level up units. I've run into a handful of matches where there is zero chance of winning the enemy units are so over-leveled. An attack buggy should not beat a tank in a 1v1... If EA doesn't fix that problem I'm just going to be uninstalling it and walking away. Not going to be surprised if that ends up happening.

C&C Rivals would be a ton of fun, if EA didn't make it pay to win... I do wish my power hadn't gone out, not much I could do there with a little over 48 hours of no power.

#notmysanta

We must vote for soft pluralism tonight to break this deadlock. We can begin new negotiations tomorrow.

If we get another stalemate, we will at least have a record we can start combing through to figure out who didn't follow along. This is better than nothing.

It's not going to be easy, but I think we can do it. We'll have to see what happens tonight, but I don't see why it isn't possible.