Jump to content

OrangeP47

Forum Game Masters
  • Posts

    11,352
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    23
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

Everything posted by OrangeP47

  1. I subscribe to the theory that votes affect the zeitgeist of the game and we can analyze that.
  2. We can at least make a go of it, though one train not being a person doesn't help.
  3. In a world where FRAYDO is somehow right that scum used last night to scout, they probably know exactly who to hit tonight while we're sitting here with our pants down doing nothing. Granted, in that world, and if FRAYDO is town, killing FRAYDO is also not ideal
  4. Let's just say I'm not the most confident in our night abilities. I mean, I'll just repeat what I said D1 about surrendering initiative.
  5. If we no lynch, where will be tomorrow? We need to seriously ask ourselves that. We'll probably be right back here. This is stalling the game.
  6. Retal is requesting we go back to talking about Fire Emblem because he's a NERD.
  7. Have you watched all three of the new movies or is this more complaining about things you haven't watched?
  8. No seriously, both those movies have good ratings it's not just me.
  9. I technically have a "2 faction Mafia English Civil War" mafia idea floating around too.
  10. It's one of the original movies, The Undiscovered Country, generally considered one of the best. Before I seriously slacked off on the GMing game I was designing a Mafia around it.
  11. It's like the scene in Star Trek 6. They correctly conclude the torpedo that disabled the Klingon Chancellor's ship did not come from the Enterprise, but was fired by a cloaked vessel underneath them. But you know what they did before coming to that conclusion? They actually counted how many torpedoes on board to make sure they didn't fire it, as it first appeared, and only came to that conclusion after verifying every torpedo was accounted for. Generally Spock's famous quote afterwards is used to support the idea that sometimes some strange batshit things happen sometimes, but actually they did their *due diligence* in making sure the mundane was not happening first before jumping to that conclusion.
  12. I wouldn't say "one kind of work". Indeed, there's several tools I tout as being great ways to scumhunt. However, there are also ways to scumhunt incorrectly. Building a case using too many assumptions without verifying any of your assumptions is one of them. Sure, when you have nothing better, you can go with such a case, but when you have something better, you should not. If you want it explained simply, "Chasing wild fantasy is generally a bad idea". Why do you think I argue with Shade so much.
  13. TBH it's something I should say to you as well, with your grandiose leaps of logic at times Though that is not exactly the issue at hand here.
  14. We have too many people either trying to put the cart before the horse, or keep the cart in the stable entirely, to use one of my patented farm metaphors.
×
×
  • Create New...