ChopBam

With just vanilla abilities here also, I'm just kinda riding along.

Yeah buddy I just spent the whole game bussing my partner. It was so outlandish (and mixed with desperate town claims) that I just wasn't sure. Thanks for clarifying.

Can't tell if Jeod was just being in character for all of this or if he's actually being genuinely upset in the parts that claim "no point in playing or hosting," "wasting a good part of the day," and "participation abuse."

Your personal expressions of incredulity are unconvincing to me. I'd hope that even you would admit that lynching you at this point should answer more questions that we really need to have answered.

Finding the partner is indeed one piece of the puzzle. Usually I put bigger stock in this piece of the puzzle, but honestly you've been all over the place this game, and considering the combination of the numerous disconnected bits with all the chaos and confusion you've introduced this game, I'm happy to eliminate some of that confusion and chaos by lynching a liar. If you are town, then this is something you pretty much did to yourself.

I read your long post again, and the closest thing I can find to an answer is something we already knew: that your PM said you attempted to pass your item. And some things about how you worded this to the rest of us. But I'm not seeing where you said explicitly whether you still have the item or not.

mafia edit: "Do you know.." ??

So, do know whether you're still holding the item or don't you?

Heard the phrase "lynch all liars"? Your claims seem to shift to whatever most conveniences you in the moment.

Well I suppose I am comfortable again re-adding my vote. ##vote Jeod

I suppose it is possible that the GM actually used Jeod's name in the message receipt. It'd just be confusing, which I suppose lends credence to Louis' confusion. I am used to Verti60 games where he just says "target" and I have no idea who the actual target is, if there is a bussing action.

Glad to see you're on the same page as the rest of us now. :D Wording is important, especially in answering clarifying questions.

Ok, so it sounds like you are changing your answer to my question. So instead of "yes, specifically." You meant "[no,] I targeted Jeod in my action but it could have been redirected."

I know this, and is the reason I asked her this specific question. Contrary to my expectation she doubled down and said it was confirmed to be Jeod. 🤷‍♀️

Louis has also contradicted this. So now you and Louis have two points of contradiction with each other. The PM stating the name of the target (Louis says Jeod was named), versus just "target" without naming who the target was (Cat5 says the GM can't confirm). Louis says she targeted Jeod specifically, and Cat5 says she targeted Irishman specifically.

@ Louis Cat5 didn't claim to roleblock Irish. You and Cat5 are contradicting each other.

I've heard "tracked," "watched," "jailed," and "roleblocked" when it comes to Cat5's ability. Have any of those been confirmed as claimed by him?

I think either Cat5 or Louis is lying.

##unvote More things to think about, but Jeod's not off the hook.

You were told specifically that you detained Jeod? Not just "target" or whatever?

Am I the only one getting caught up on this wording here? Has excuse for why he can't check his items with an inventory, instead it works another way "for some reason". "having trouble adjusting to this role being town" "double checked alignment with KY" So Jeod you admit your roleclaim is pretty sus? This, with all the other evidence we have.. how could we not vote you? Besides, still failed the "r u scum" test on D1. ##vote Jeod

What happens if the roleblockers target each other?

I was hoping you'd think that.

Light Infantry can't do anything at night. Thus, no visitations, items (as far as I know), or actions.