Games [Game Over] Game of Thrones Conquest Mafia RPG

[Retaliation]

The maths is bad.

[Jeod]

Just now, OrangeP47 said:

No, I see the factors, the math just works out for Retal.  My math is better than your math.  In the end though I'm not going to complain too loudly though, because it's YOUR funeral, so it's no skin off my nose.

Sounds like heresy.

[Sunflower]

5 minutes ago, Retaliation said:

I feel like Voe was sneaky and stayed loyalist to punish us if he went back to lynch voe day 1 meta.

I was thinking that too when he was complaining about not being the hand (could have been smoke & mirrors tho). 

But he's probably going to be a thorn in our sides eventually, and I wouldn't shed any tears for a Lannister.

[OrangeP47]

1 minute ago, Jeod said:

Sounds like heresy.

Make another post and you're 6666

[Louis]

Okay I'm starting to understand now, right now the main votes seem to be towards Retal and rubeci

[OrangeP47]

I could possibly be convinced to go for Voe, but eh, I dunno.

[rubeci]

I was about to switch my vote to Retal, but lets see if there is more against Voe first.

[Retaliation]

2 minutes ago, Sunflower said:

I was thinking that too when he was complaining about not being the hand (could have been smoke & mirrors tho). 

But he's probably going to be a thorn in our sides eventually, and I wouldn't shed any tears for a Lannister.

Killing him now for when he inevitably betrays us later is an angle I had not considered.

[OrangeP47]

I mean I feel like if we send Voe to the wall he'll let the zombies in on purpose.

[Louis]

Just now, OrangeP47 said:

I mean I feel like if we send Voe to the wall he'll let the zombies in on purpose.

Can he do that tho?

[Jeod]

Voe would be at the mercy of the Lord Commander.

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Louis said:

Can he do that tho?

We don't know the full range of what he can do, but we know he can explicitly abandon his post later at least.

[Louis]

1 minute ago, Retaliation said:

Killing him now for when he inevitably betrays us later is an angle I had not considered.

But we aren't killing him tho, we may send him to the wall

[Retaliation]

Just now, Jeod said:

Voe would be at the mercy of the Lord Commander.

Inb4 Voe becomes the Lord Commander.

[Louis]

Just now, OrangeP47 said:

We don't know the full range of what he can do, but we know he can explicitly abandon his post later at least.

What happens if someone abbandons their post, will they still be alive and ingame?

[Jeod]

Just now, Louis said:

What happens if someone abbandons their post, will they still be alive and ingame?

They become an independent house.

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Louis said:

What happens if someone abbandons their post, will they still be alive and ingame?

Well they'll still be alive and in game presumably, but what exactly it means we don't know.  I assume they're still independent, and likely will be screwing with whatever the rest of us are trying to do at that moment, so I presume, basically, if we send Voe to the wall, that that's not the end of him.

[Sunflower]

It sounds like they lose their perks too, but we don't really know the details.

[Louis]

Ah okay, so we can either send him to the wall, risking the fact that he might abandon his post or actually kill him? Correct?

[Sunflower]

But who knows, maybe being at the wall is fun and some people might want to stay there to do w.e it is they do there.

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Louis said:

Ah okay, so we can either send him to the wall, risking the fact that he might abandon his post or actually kill him? Correct?

Yeah but killing him there's a fight, and he claims to have a large army...

[Louis]

1 minute ago, OrangeP47 said:

Yeah but killing him there's a fight, and he claims to have a large army...

By fight do you mean all of us have to fight him? Or the king's army?

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Louis said:

By fight do you mean all of us have to fight him? Or the king's army?

The royal army invades but it's backed up by the loyalist house forces so the casualties are spread around, or so Verti said.

[Louis]

Sounds complex

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Louis said:

Sounds complex

Basically, if we straight up eliminate Voe, our army strength is going to take a big hit, especially if he actually turns out to be loyalist.  Sending him to the wall all of that will be fine, but he might come back to bite us in the ass later anyway, and knowing him he'll probably be pretty pissed off, so...

[OrangeP47]

Though if he's actually a rebel....

[Shade939]

2 minutes ago, OrangeP47 said:

Though if he's actually a rebel....

Hugh, that sounds like complex or something. And the easiest way to avoid any potential problems would be to require more proof before eliminating someone, but then we'd also need an option to vote no lynch when we had insufficient proof, and Verti basically banned that option.

[Louis]

1 minute ago, Shade939 said:

Hugh, that sounds like complex or something. And the easiest way to avoid any potential problems would be to require more proof before eliminating someone, but then we'd also need an option to vote no lynch when we had insufficient proof, and Verti basically banned that option.

I don't agree with that, eliminating a person with narrow down who the rebels are and I agree about Voe, but at the same time I don't want to vote for him because he might come back and bite us in the ass but I'm down to vote somebody

[Jeod]

Orange, you're forgetting your place. I've stated already that we won't be eliminating anyone today. There's no need to yet.

[OrangeP47]

2 minutes ago, Shade939 said:

Hugh, that sounds like complex or something. And the easiest way to avoid any potential problems would be to require more proof before eliminating someone, but then we'd also need an option to vote no lynch when we had insufficient proof, and Verti basically banned that option.

*world's smallest violin*