Jump to content

GeneralCamo

Staff
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,458

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    25

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

 Content Type 

Everything posted by GeneralCamo

  1. GeneralCamo
    If you pegged me correctly? You believe we are on the same side? Are you confused about your alignments? Or did you ignore the part where I claimed soviet? If you didn't, you would have acknowledged that and either supported it or claimed I lied, or at least showed skepticism towards it. But you are (as Jeod terms it) fencesitting to an extreme point here, and that is intolerable. He could be neutral, but he could also be the scum or TP we are looking for. Regardless, I have sound reason to doubt he is town.
  2. GeneralCamo
    Indeed, and he played Game One and was one of the people who loved my MCT role that I had. So he's not new to this. ##vote FRAYDO Explain yourself or get lynched.
  3. GeneralCamo
    Funny you literally ignore all of the posts me, Jeod, Cat5, and everyone else here made FRAYDO. Who the hell are you? Reinforcing my suspicions against him.
  4. GeneralCamo
    This Looks like it is time for me to roleclaim since that is a legitimate concern that I would like to shoot down: Soviet Mammoth Tank Role: Vehicle/Vehicle Destroyer Battle Action: Shoot a player. 25% chance of stuck, 50% killing (100% if a vehicle) Plan Action: Protect a player. I am also a protection role. Hence why I don't need to confirm anyone else is: I am one.
  5. GeneralCamo
    Indeed that is true. Granted, you voted him too. And let's be fair: He was being extremely bold yesterday. It wasn't until I reread the OP last night, reread his posts, saw your realization. and then saw his failed lynch that I also realized something. Mojoman: Don't be so sure. I'm sure there are doctors and/or engineers in the base to keep you safe. I don't think the allies or other killer will make a move until they think they killed the protection role. Mojoman is STILL being bold actually considering his post above too, so you really can't blame me for voting him. <_< The post linking fractions to me = SCUM!!!! Mafia edits are fun!!!!!
  6. GeneralCamo
    Cat5 is probably smart enough to know that Mojo could have been protected last night by a doctor or bodyguard, since I doubt we are the only ones to know his secret. Hence why they could have went for a less obvious target to prevent that. I'm assuming you know his secret considering your "oh crap" reaction last night and your statements confirming town? Hence the "we" part.
  7. GeneralCamo
    There is another possibility I didn't think of: That KY DIDN'T kill Nodlied. He could have been doing a roleblock (powerful considering we might have a SAM site, so this would balance that aspect if there is a Longbow), and not a kill. This means we might have a TP with a NK and/or Serial Killer on the loose. The events during N2 should give us more perspective. Anyway, it's time to analyze the players! Confirmed Town Mojoman: His statements and his lynch immunity implies Airfield. His secret is extremely powerful, assuming that Yak wasn't the only aircraft for town. Nodlied: Rest in Peace Comrade. I do hope I at least avenged you, assuming KY did the killing. Possibly not-town Jeod: Confirmed tracker. Definitely not Allies. Could be TP though. Category 5: Your arguments are shady. You voted me without giving much of an explanation, while previously you argued against focusing on me (in favor of Isaac and Mojo) when Chaos_Knight voted me? No offense, but this is hypocritical, and top scummy behavior. Chaos_Knight: Same with you. Your behavior has been a bit erratic so far. You are literally splitting hairs trying to find a way to vote for me to die. I'm actually highly suspecting you two of working together considering the voting pattern. Did you two bus your teammate? Or are you part of the third party we have been looking for? The mason doesn't apply until D4, so don't give me that excuse. Isaac: Awfully quiet, seems to be just trying to go along with the flow of the game. Highly suspicious behavior, possible neutral though. But could also be scum or TP. Chopbam: Was quiet for most of D1, but he is active now. Voted for Isaac who displayed scummy behavior, but could be bussing him. Or just knows there was no way for him to be lynched with me and Mojo as targets. Voe: Who is he again? Seriously, awfully quiet. We didn't lynch him N1 so confirmed Scum/TP. No, not really, but still suspicious behavior. FRAYDO: Suspiciously quiet. Why is it that everyone is quiet this game? For this reason, I really can't vote anyone now, since pretty much everyone is suspicious. But my major suspicions are on Cat5 and Chaos right now for their strange voting behavior. I could analyze myself, but that would be extremely biased. I'll leave that for someone else. Confirmed Scum Killing_You: REST IN PIECES YOU CAPITALIST PIG. SHOULD HAVE BROUGHT SOMETHING WITH A WEAPON, RATHER THAN A CRAPPY JAMMER.
  8. GeneralCamo
    Another thing: I think the Allies had TWO nightkills every other night. Or perhaps they had two options for a nightkill every other night: One general, and one that bypasses protections like being a vehicle (the Longbow). Wouldn't make sense otherwise honestly (since why would you bother ever landing once you takeoff if your nightshot is redundant?). So I think we just dodged a REALLY bad bullet. ....fractions are scummy? That's worse than Chaos' claim that I am scummy for explaining too much. Also: VERT. FIX YOUR GRAMMAR AND SPELLING ISSUES!
  9. GeneralCamo
    Numbers Analysis: I've been thinking of the possible combinations of Allies/Neutrals/TP/Soviets last night. Killing_You's death pretty much confirms a 3 scum team, assuming one helicopter, one helipad, one misc. Based on my numbers last night (with adjustments considering what KY's death just gave us), here are some possible combinations: 3 TP/3 Allies/1 Neutral/4 Soviet 3 TP/3 Allies/0 Neutral/5 Soviet 2 TP/3 Allies/1 Neutral/5 Soviet 2 TP/3 Allies/0 Neutral/6 Soviet 0 TP/4 Allies/0 Neutral/7 Soviet 0 TP/3 Allies/1 Neutral/7 Soviet 0 TP/3 Allies/0 Neutral/8 Soviet I think at this point we confirmed the TP is a faction (otherwise there would be little distinction between them and Neutral anyway), which implies at least two people on it. There may be the possibility of a second TP faction which would throw these numbers out of whack. Doubt that though honestly. I also highly doubt there will be more than one neutral in this game. There might not be any neutrals in this game, but I made that a possibility to account for. I also accounted for the (relatively low) chance that there isn't a TP, and Verti is just teasing us with the fluff. Generally though, Verti doesn't do that.
  10. GeneralCamo
    HAHAHA we got him boys! Still, he WASN'T a helicopter. This implies a 3 scum team, based on some numbers I calculated last night. I'll post it up soon-ish, as it's a long one. Radar Jammer implies role blocker of some sort. This might explain the visitation.
  11. GeneralCamo
    ...well this thread is going by extremely quickly compared to last night. I literally completely missed the last 3 posts before mine. Thanks forum!
  12. GeneralCamo
    Good thing we have vehicle destroyers then. ##shoot Killing_You
  13. GeneralCamo
    Playing the same gambit I did in the first game ehh Mojoman? I see. Makes sense honestly considering you are unlynchable. But, we need to consider the options here: You are a Soviet building, baiting a lynch to find the scum (see: Me first game) You are an Allied building, baiting a lynch to find scapegoats for your fellow scummates You are a third party, baiting a lynch to find good smart targets to kill first before they realize who you are. I doubt 3 is applicable in this scenario, since a good third party wouldn't draw attention to themselves this early. 2 might be possible, but I am willing to bet 1 is the most likely for this reason.
  14. GeneralCamo
    He asked a question about my voting pattern, so I explained it to clear up that matter. It's not hard to type up an explanation on things.
  15. GeneralCamo
    I had to leave for several hours unexpectedly, just got home now. I was hoping Mojoman would post something in his defense, but he didn't. So now he dies for his incompetence/scumminess.
  16. GeneralCamo
    Mojoman: Your lack of defense is troubling me so close to hammer. You haven't responded to any of our statements or votes against you. While a no lynch is better than a bad lynch, there is plenty of evidence against you, and you haven't even tried to defend yourself. ##vote Mojoman Chaos_Knight: What the hell kind-of statement is that? I "explain too much" and that makes me suspicious? How the hell does that make sense? Should I just begin voting randomly with no explanation, and not answer anyone?
  17. GeneralCamo
    It's snowing tonight... even though I'm in the American south, and it's summer for anyone in the Southern Hemisphere. Likely Australians, probably.
  18. GeneralCamo
    I just did it as a bit of a joke and tradition in these mafia games, where we vote Voe D1 always. I'm not stupid enough to give an easy hammer opportunity for the Mafia literally 10 minutes after the day started though, hence why I unvoted immediately. Plus the fact that Voe didn't actually do anything wrong. I should point out that Nodlied STILL hasn't unvoted Voe yet. Why is that? Does he want to kill someone randomly for no reason? If this is the case, who is he working for? I'm going to prevent an RNGesus from occurring yet again and give one to the No Lynch. I don't want to hammer a no lynch however, so I will retract my vote if that looks to be the case. ##vote No Lynch No lynch is always a bad idea. It literally gives scum a free night kill. Regardless, here is where i would normally say something smart but i still havent read the thread so not this time As opposed to lynching someone for no reason, who would likely turn out to be a townie because of pure probability and the fact that RNGesus doesn't care for us as we saw the last two games? That would be TWO free night kills if that was the case, which it likely will. Mojoman: I too am keen to see your explanation for your statements. These ones specifically: I can brush off the first statement as little more than the usual natter and fooling around that happens in the first day, but when you put it together with the second and third statements, then it comes off to me as either: Baiting a lynch (fool or lynchproof?) Pure stupidity Something more sinister, like a bomb (See: Isaac from the second game) What is your purpose to these statements? I'm holding my vote as No Lynch for now (especially the risk of lynching a bomb), but I am keeping my suspicions towards you.
  19. GeneralCamo
    I just did it as a bit of a joke and tradition in these mafia games, where we vote Voe D1 always. I'm not stupid enough to give an easy hammer opportunity for the Mafia literally 10 minutes after the day started though, hence why I unvoted immediately. Plus the fact that Voe didn't actually do anything wrong. I should point out that Nodlied STILL hasn't unvoted Voe yet. Why is that? Does he want to kill someone randomly for no reason? If this is the case, who is he working for? I'm going to prevent an RNGesus from occurring yet again and give one to the No Lynch. I don't want to hammer a no lynch however, so I will retract my vote if that looks to be the case. ##vote No Lynch
  20. GeneralCamo
    We need to cover all of our bases however. This *IS* D1 after all, we do not have too much to go by. Otherwise I would be looking at far more than a single shady statement.
  21. GeneralCamo
    This statement is extremely shady. This implies either a Cop or other investigative role that knows they are BP/LP and wants to bait people, a vanilla that wants to bait people, a scum that wants to bait someone, pure stupidity, or something more sinister.
  22. GeneralCamo
    Is Mojoman claiming cop or similar?
  23. GeneralCamo
    Scum =/ allied. They could be Grunyev, Molotov, Nod, rogue allies, etc. Point is, there is a possibility of two NKs per day, which is highly dangerous for us all. I would expect this game to have a fair share of power roles if that was the case.
  24. GeneralCamo
    You know, I'm also thinking we might have a second scum team (read: a second night kill) rather than a third party. If this is the case, we might have two night kills on our hands, which could be VERY dangerous.
  25. GeneralCamo
    Well, this has heated up pretty quickly.
×
×
  • Create New...