-
Posts
2,765 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
76 -
Donations
160.00 USD
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Documentation
Bug Tracker
Downloads
Posts posted by TeamWolf
-
-
Iron Man, because he plays by most of the rules.
0 -
reading this thread you have to remember, this is an FPS version of C&C not battlefield. So when you balance this game you dont do it like battlefield, you balance it the way the units work in C&C.
Having restrictions is what makes it very much like C&C. So while fliers in C&C only had 1 weapon and couldnt attack each other than doing the same in the game would give it a C&C feel.
Its very important to keep the C&C feel rather than turning it into a battlefield game.
APB took a Battlefield approach many years ago.
0 -
Re-enable !vote cyclemap ??
That was removed because people would rail on it too much.
0 -
Maybe I shouldn't be the guy to say it, but perhaps the time limit could be increased on certain large maps, like KOTG? From what I remember, they used to be 35 min instead of 30. Today I was able to destroy a couple defenses and both gap generators, but I felt with more time I could have accomplished more.
There are also so many routes to take and potential things to do that it rarely gets boring. At least for me. Sincerely, the biased guy.
Don't do that unless you implement a mechanic that ends the game in situations where both teams lose all main production buildings. It'd just prolong a boring match even more, and empty the server, something which unfortunately does happen. If you did implement such a mechanic, though, then I agree that large maps need 5-10 minutes extra play time.
I got to agree with Raap, it would be dire if it was a boring stalemate for that long. The great thing about keeping the map times on the short, even more so in big maps, means that it keeps it's great pace of gameplay and given how many routes there are to take, it would be mean different things happen each game.
0 -
Which pretty much proved that moving to 5.0 won't hinder any of the playerbase, from what we can see anyway.
0 -
There is a point where you got to forgo "realism" and do what makes sense gameplay wise. An ST or OT being flown in via Chinook be a good idea tbh.
0 -
No rocket/ RPG troopers without barracks? THAT'S UNFAIR if the other side has armor/aircraft/ships HOW is the side without the any anti-armor supposed to fight back if they don't have any vehicles, vessels or aircraft to counter (if they've lost War Factory, HP NY/SB), it's almost like you want to the other side to just give up even though might have Conyard, Refinery/silos/ left add the ability to buy them without barracks back next patch or I'm no longer playing APB.
It's the penalty you get for losing your Barracks. Just like when you lose your War Factory, I don't see you being able to get the lower tech vehicles when that goes down.
0 -
I'm going with Lu Bu from Dynasty Warriors.
Do you wish to pursue Lu Bu?
>[] Absolutely! For the Glory of Cao Cao!
>[] No, we must escape Luoyang immediately! Do not pursue Lu Bu.
I was thinking the same thing haha.
0 -
And yet this guy is a mod.
Stay on topic.
0 -
At last, Hostile Waters!! Awesome work so far Raap!
0 -
I think having RS after you loose the barracks is bad, having the other two options keeps players in game a bit. It also still leaves that side with some different strategies to use.
0 -
Rick Astley is a legend.
He's a decent London radio DJ now.
0 -
Are the Allied and Soviet snipers identical now?
Yes.
0 -
I dislike snipers on this engine, I think they are decent as they are tbh.
1 -
can we add some US based servers in the future? i feel like im back on dial up and its kind of soiling the experience.
I used to get worse when it was US based lol.
0 -
That was part of the founding idea of this community.
1 -
I am not 100% sure about this, but APB is running on scripts 5.0 which doesn't support Windows XP anymore. Correct me if I'm wrong.
I was under the same impression.
0 -
Okay it's listed there but I can't install it why?
Because it's not released yet.
0 -
So... all the drama last year was for nothing?
No, it had a purpose that is still heavily applicable.
0 -
Dune 2000
0 -
Something we want try and have is a chat system on the launcher so you can see who's online and give a shout to who wants to play!
4 -
It's amazing to finally see such an amazing project join us and have all major W3D projects together!
1 -
Happy Holidays from Arrakis!
1 -
Sorry to hear me, something else will come along just as good or better!
0
Additional units in APB?
in W3D Hub Discussion
Posted
We know you guys want certain RA1 units in, but please listen to Lead Devs. These guys work with the engine and game the most and know what can and can't be done, also what would and wouldn't work. Delta's balance currently is pretty damn fantastic and all of it's units fit their roles perfectly. Adding in a unit just because it's not there would mean redefining every role linked to it, which could result in horribly destroying the game balance.
As we have also stated before, APB isn't going to be going under any major changes here at W3D Hub.