Jump to content

Category 5 Hurricane

VIPs
  • Posts

    5,037
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    34
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

Everything posted by Category 5 Hurricane

  1. Wow, I had what seemed to be two contradictory actions taken upon me. Given that one of these actions hasn't been claimed, I think we might be missing part of the story here.
  2. I didn't wake up early enough to read anything before I went to work, so I was entirely unaware of any of the suspicions that were tossed at me during the end of the day. Can't say I understand why the vote went between me and FRAYDO when I thought ChopBam and Sunflower were the likely choices. I'm not going to try to defend myself at this time. The current situation I'm in is favorable to me, so I don't mind keeping it that way. Continue with whatever plans you have.
  3. I actually have a problem with the scum!ChopBam argument because of how the D1 voting went. Unfortunately, Shade was vote blocked. Maybe we can try to find out how he would have voted?
  4. I don't know what you are referring to. Flipside of what?
  5. My top suspects are ChopBam and Sunflower. I really dislike this post: I don't think a town player needs to spend much time hoping that he'll be cleared of doing the NK by visiting someone who wasn't killed. Indeed, it's a scum player who has the most to gain by being caught doing an action that doesn't seem to have a negative effect. Given that it appears that Shade did the NK and the target attempted to kill TheIrishman, nobody gets any level of clearance just because they were doing something else. Your position has not changed, ChopBam. You are still a possible suspect, at the same level as you were before. You are not in a position to demand votes shift away from you. I also really dislike this post:
  6. Holy shit, TheIrishman. Drawing out that info just to turn it around on him was glorious! It needed an OBJECTION! meme to go with it, but damn.
  7. I don't believe that the lack of a NK will be because Shade has BP and was targeted by scum. He's been way too useful to scum in previous games to take him out N1. Well, unless Jeod is scum. Because Shade's tunnel vision keeps him on Jeod at all times, if Jeod actually were scum, I could see Jeod having a reason to remove Shade, which he has already shown a willingness to do.
  8. Could even be a case where scum intentionally failed to kill. Again. Could even be a tactic to get back to ending the game on MYLO instead of LYLO, though if they do that on purpose it just gives us extra phases, so I'm totally ok with that.
  9. I could see it being useful for Ace Attorney or Danganronpa-themed games.
  10. What I know is that someone targeted iLTS with an action called Hex. This appeared to be the only visitor. I don't know who it is, though I have a suspect. I also think I know what Jeod targeted me with, and as a result I'm not concerned about him for now.
  11. Technically the forum time on his post (and yours before it) was 10:01, so I wouldn't have counted it either.
  12. Unfortunately, I don't think your gambit really got us a good enough reason to justify lynching someone, and would rather us use the nolynch, that we will have to do at some point to give us the maximum number of phases, out of the way at the start where we have the lowest chance of hitting scum anyway.
  13. Right, but then scum would only need to react if your target was on one of them, which is why ChopBam and OrangeP47 became suspicious after your move. Killing someone for them would just be another step closer to winning, though having someone cleared could be a problem.
  14. I don't follow that, Jeod. If you claim that you can only kill scum with your action, why would they be concerned that you might kill town instead?
  15. From my point of view, his claims line up in a way that I think is more beneficial for town. It's his targeting of Shade afterward that gives me pause.
  16. We don't need a third reminder of that. We all read at and are aware that Jeod's claim changed. It comes down to why he did so, not just if he did so.
  17. If the action has a chance to kill at all, it's a gamble that he'll be caught lying. If the action doesn't kill, what does he gain by saying it might?
  18. Wow, kinda flipped around that statement as I was writing it.
  19. It doesn't make sense for Jeod to claim he would only kill scum if he were scum himself. If you die and flip town, it'll be obvious he lied and there isn't even a possibility that the action was manipulated.
  20. Of course it isn't impossible. But by choosing not to nolynch when the game is (probably) 8 v 2, you are reducing the number of turns we have to find scum. NoLynch D1 - Phases where scum can be caught N1 D2 N2 D3 N3 D4 Mislynch D1 N1 D2 N2 D3
  21. You desire a situation where we must lynch correctly by D3 or we lose?
  22. As it stands right now, assuming Shade does not die, we do need to get a nolynch in this game at least once because otherwise MYLO will be D3, assuming a 2 person skrull team, no failed kills, and no correct lynches. I don't think we're going to be able to get a proper response to these actions, so I think nolynching is a good idea here. ##vote nolynch
  23. Is there any reason to get worked up over it when the action has already been taken?
×
×
  • Create New...