iLikeToSnipe

That would be absolutely hilarious.

I just see it as giving a slight edge to anybody who wants to lie about what role they have. Sure, there are plenty of gods to pick from, but now any mafia or 3rd party know that they should steer clear of at least Greek gods. And now they know not to claim anything related to birds...

Is it one that originated from the Americas?

I was thinking more along the lines of "not from a modern source of fiction".

Is it typical in games now to change your avatar to something related to your role? Seems like something that would give away too much information.

I've got a feeling that there aren't too many classical gods in this game.

This will be refreshing. Lots of new faces...

But who will I D1 vote for...

I HAVE BEEN SUMMONED. Sign me up!

*ghost sounds* You can never get rid of my presence commie scum!

I'm a cult member? That's news to me... I'm just a ghost afaik.

##vote triattack Stop trying to desecrate the dead...

##shoot Nodlied

Welp.

Kind of disappointed with town today. We almost certainly have three scum and we've really had just six active people today. So it looks like we've already lost. If we're lucky, I might be able to change that. Camo, if you are town, sorry, but you really shouldn't make yourself a target on purpose during the first day. If you're scum, then I'm not sorry, but you really shouldn't hop onto bandwagons with flimsy reasons. ##shoot GeneralCamo I hope we can turn this around and get two scum today. I'll be back in in an hour.

Got out of my meeting, leaving for home in twenty minutes so I'll definitely be missing hammer.

If you'd made similar meta arguments I hadn't really noticed them as anything more than idle musings. All my time and attention has been on Voe and Camo. Besides, meta is literally the only argument they're pushing. About to go into a meeting. Might last longer than hammer and I'll be talking on my phone. See you all tonight or in the afterlife.

It may be too late by then, iLTS I remain undecided on the vote. Well, I've made my case. I've used logic and reason while referencing factual posts. Voe and Co have relied almost entirely on the meta of previous roles. If you think that crappy meta trumps logic then your choice is clear. I'll try checking in before hammer but doubt I can make it.

I'd like to give a tl;dr of Voe and Cat5's arguments so that everybody can save their time... META! PICTURES! ROLES! Will make a detailed post when I'm home, should be in four hours.

You're making the exact same mistake Voe is making. Why do I have to have the exact same role as what is on the standard quick mafia role chart? I might not have known about custom roles and didn't request one, doesn't mean Vertigo didn't give me one himself. Camo claimed to have tracked me even though I was being interrogated. It doesn't make any mechanical sense that somebody couldn't perform any kind of tracking action on me while I was jailed. If you trust Voe, how could I possibly have planted C4 at him? He claims that he locked me up, which means I don't get an action. Voe has backed up my claim that I was unable to perform any actions. Camo has backed up my claim that I was tracked. Also, why do you think it's scummy that I've "ignored" the shot Voe took at you? Isn't it scummier to be the one who actually took the shot? The only reasons you've listed to vote for me are ignoring posts made by Voe and Camo and they're very, very meta-gamey.

Not sure what else I can say that hasn't been said so I'm just going to recap here. During the night, Voe locked me up for interrogation. He claims that he found out what my role was and that I'm lying about it. However, that's not why he first voted for me. What happened this morning was that Voe just up and shot Cat5 because he was a veteran player and Voe suspected Cat5 of being scum who would have offed Chaos. Now, after Nodlied asked me to post some more I responded and said that I would post something later since I was busy. Voe leapt at that opening and voted against me. He claimed that the fact that I didn't even comment about him shooting Cat5 was "super allied". On top of that, he was "shocked" that I didn't immediately vote to lynch him. Since when have I ever done something like that in a mafia game? Whether or not I'm town or scum. So, from the start Voe has shot at Cat5 with very little cause for suspicion and then immediately tried to railroad me when I said that I was busy and would be responding later. Shortly after that Voe says he wants to hammer me and then backtracks on that once we all point out how scummy it is. Now, enter Camo. He comes in to the thread and calls me a liar saying he tracked me to Voe. After several flimsy reasons for not trusting me "bodyguard isn't a generic role", "you're targeting me", and accusing me of jumping on a bandwagon against him yesterday. After I counter all of these reasons, and he even agrees with most of them, he still votes for me. Sounds like a bandwagon to me... That sounds scummy to me, regardless of Camo's allegiance. Why would you have business to settle? Once the votes started piling on Camo he basically asked for more votes. I don't what kind of role a town member would need to have where they want it. This whole thing is fishy. You're talking shit as always. I'm simply not a fan of picking on people because we deem them inferior in terms of intelligence. One thing I looked back on was Voe's posting history on the first day. He was threatening towards us when we started to vote for Camo; who was most certainly acting scummy with wanting us to lynch him. "I'm simply not a fan of picking on people because we deem them inferior in terms of intelligence."? I didn't even mention Camo's intelligence in my post, I just mentioned he was acting scummy. Why would Voe try to defend somebody who is acting scummy and asking us to lynch him? It seems to me that Voe and Camo have been pretty chummy throughout the first two days. Despite Camo's suspicious behavior Voe backed him up. Despite any valid arguments from Camo he's still backing Voe up on this bandwagon against me. Maybe Voe is being a hyperaggressive, insane cop and maybe Camo is being an insane lynch proof, tracker townie and they've both been backing each other up without using any sound logic. But I find that unlikely. The most likely explanation I can think of for their behavior is that Voe and Camo are Allied spies and are in communication with each other. Between a potentially lynch proof scum and a scum who can block roles (and possibly find out what they are) I think we should lynch the rollblocker. My vote will be staying on Voe and I hope you all will take the time to reread their posts.

I fail to see what argument was there against you? He claimed I was at your place last night, which I was. Why he thought that meant I was lying when we both claimed the same thing is beyond me. That's why I attacked him. This starting to look like a fumbled scum tag-team. Fair point. ...which doesn't change the fact you lied about your role and what you do, and now you're trying to distract the audience. You should also know better than that. I don't even mind getting lynched as town cop or doctor, as i really enjoy watching town morons lose the game later on. You lose either way. Getting lynched today or tomorrow. Why not just give up? According to you. We've already seen that there are non-standard roles in this game. Either you are town and an insane cop or you are scum and trying to railroad me. Anyways, about to start playing some competitive multiplayer. Gonna be afk for a bit, will check in one more time before I go to bed.