Category 5 Hurricane

Louis actually jailed TheIrishman. I don't believe this claim that Jeod was also jailed. I think this is something else.

That's because Jeod suddenly claiming he was jailed does not fit what I think happened, and it makes me rather annoyed that I have to consider if it's actually true.

Specifically, scum!TheIrishman has previously deployed the "Don't talk on D1 so everyone forgets about me" plan.

I picked from my suspect list.

Incorrect. What the fuck? No you were not. If that is true, that is fucking ridiculous.

His behavior has me leaning pretty heavy on the scum side. The claimed roleblock on Jeod might not have anything to do with the lack of a kill, however.

Does not directly contradict Louis's claimed ability, no. Not sure what that last part of the question means.

I said earlier, not yet. I've got more info to give, but there is a bunch to think about. There are complications.

There is something he should have to report, yes, but he seems to be reluctant to talk about it.

Hey, @ TheIrishman , where did you go? I know you have something to say.

...Why this nonsense again? Just wait until TheIrishman reports.

Oh, you actually don't know how interesting it's going to get.

Not right now. What I'm seeing right here is very interesting.

It's true, and I feel like whenever we have a long break like this, it's easier to forget what you "aren't supposed to do" when given that question. As much as even I acknowledge the "MU Rule" as a joke, I keep it in mind. I still feel kind of off regarding the TP/Neutrals being brought up. Thinking about TP/Neutrals at this stage of the game is scum-leaning in my book. But now I feel like I might have misunderstood the discussion due to not knowing the source material and might be tunneling a bit, so whatever. I'll give it a pass, for now. We'll see what we think in the morning.

##vote nolynch

I agree, but I'd like to hear why you think so in more detail.

I'm confused. Wasn't your question in response to what he labeled you? Why are you speculating on your own alignment? Did I miss something?

Ah, so it IS Orange! ##vote OrangeP47

A mafia game I don't have to design my own role for? I didn't know we could do that around here. I have no knowledge of the flavor, but that won't stop me.

I feel like all of these have potential worth. I think option 1 has the most potential risk but also most potential gain. Really I feel like we should somehow do all three options.

My choice is merely based on my own assumption that choices 1 & 2 essentially guarantees contact with an enemy and 3 might not. I feel like we aren't particularly well armed and I'm hoping the town presents an opportunity to somehow gather more equipment before moving on towards the objective. I know that's a lot of blind assumptions, but that's what we're all doing at this point, so....

I believe you would have won the game if you killed me N2. With ChopBam's pride you would have had complete control of the vote. Game over. Granted, yes, I made it look like I had night protection. My role claim was counting on the ability for someone to do that (I was actually reading ChopBam to be a watcher and was expecting him to catch my killer. But none of that matters. What matters is that it was possible for scum to win after one NK and one mislynch.

The fact that the game could have been over after N2 was a big yikes, but we managed to avoid that. I really do think that if Shade hadn't gone all-in on his scummy Day 3 play to try to get lynched then, he could've won Day 4. I never saw anything scummy from him until he flipped that switch. Unfortunately that reverse psychology didn't work. I wasn't going to be convinced that scum didn't want Shade lynched when ChopBam was double-voting for it. All it did was make Shade look scummier than Retal, and eliminated his last chance.

@ Shade939

Did any of that actually matter?