Jump to content
Message added by Jeod,

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, iLikeToSnipe said:

Why would they be?

Too many neutrals, especially if a Third Party is also in play, as game could be over too quickly.

Posted
1 minute ago, Category 5 Hurricane said:

Too many neutrals, especially if a Third Party is also in play, as game could be over too quickly.

I mean, chalk me up for the "I highly doubt we have 3 neutrals" camp too.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Category 5 Hurricane said:

Too many neutrals, especially if a Third Party is also in play, as game could be over too quickly.

I don't think it's likely, but I also don't think it's impossible. Jeod might be pulling something crazy here. But as long as it's balanced, it's okay.

I do think it's a dangerous mentality to think that something can't happen because it hasn't been done before. Yeah, if something seems far fetched because of game balance (i.e. KY's win condition) that's something to investigate and doubt. But what is wrong with actually having multiple neutrals and a small scum team or some TPs?

Posted
Just now, Retaliation said:

We literally have a claim about an infectious attack, so either one of the neutrals is lying or there's a fourth player who's neither town or scum.

Jeod changed it to infected.

Posted
1 minute ago, iLikeToSnipe said:

I don't think it's likely, but I also don't think it's impossible. Jeod might be pulling something crazy here. But as long as it's balanced, it's okay.

I do think it's a dangerous mentality to think that something can't happen because it hasn't been done before. Yeah, if something seems far fetched because of game balance (i.e. KY's win condition) that's something to investigate and doubt. But what is wrong with actually having multiple neutrals and a small scum team or some TPs?

Just a few minutes ago you called KY's neutral claim believable when you were attacking Shade. Now it's far fetched?

Posted
2 minutes ago, iLikeToSnipe said:

I don't think it's likely, but I also don't think it's impossible. Jeod might be pulling something crazy here. But as long as it's balanced, it's okay.

I do think it's a dangerous mentality to think that something can't happen because it hasn't been done before. Yeah, if something seems far fetched because of game balance (i.e. KY's win condition) that's something to investigate and doubt. But what is wrong with actually having multiple neutrals and a small scum team or some TPs?

The math for how the vote balance wincon works? It's not just about who gets voted and neutrals/TPs being kingmaker, but the actual wincon.

Posted

We can also tie KYs claim into this, because if his victory condition is true AND there are three neutrals, that just decreases the time he has to make his win condition even shorter.

Posted

The only way I could see a counter to these arguments is if we have things that extend the game... granted, it sounds like several of us have night protections, but we'd also need lynch protections, but it seems like only ILTS has it, and it's not like that stops us from killing *someone* so the population is still reduced.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Category 5 Hurricane said:

Just a few minutes ago you called KY's neutral claim believable when you were attacking Shade. Now it's far fetched?

Doesn't mean I buy it, but it does mean I consider it in terms of meta/game balance.

Posted
16 minutes ago, OrangeP47 said:

I'm still eating so I'm not gonna go back and dig right now, but it was at about 8:30 or 9 am your time zone today (RL)

I found it.

So you're saying that you could confirm your role then?

Posted
1 minute ago, Retaliation said:

I found it.

So you're saying that you could confirm your role then?

Yeah, I just need someone to visit me... so my frustration if these others are truly immobile and not just biding their time is... understandable, I hope you see...

Posted
Just now, OrangeP47 said:

Yeah, I just need someone to visit me... so my frustration if these others are truly immobile and not just biding their time is... understandable, I hope you see...

Like for real, when am I NOT visited N1, come on.  I'm really disappointed.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Shade939 said:

@OrangeP47, imagine if you got sone really lame abilities from another player. :p

TBH I kinda hoped you'd come experment on me just so I could see what manner of BS you really had but I was using reverse psychology :P

Posted
2 minutes ago, OrangeP47 said:

TBH I kinda hoped you'd come experment on me just so I could see what manner of BS you really had but I was using reverse psychology :P

Does it even work if I'm just passing you an item? ;)

Posted
2 minutes ago, iLikeToSnipe said:

Passing an item to Orange gives him an ability to pass a non-existent item once. :v

To be fair, I'll actually have a point in discussing my role after I actually get a chance to use it...

Posted
1 minute ago, Retaliation said:

We have 5 hours left and no idea who's going to be the lynch today.

Do we have a vote count?

My intentions haven't really changed since day start and my post then, even though we got off track, and I was/am entertaining Anon, but I'll actually put my money where my mouth is.

##Vote Killing_You

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...