Jeod Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 I have no problem abstaining from using it tonight. The caution comes from wanting to protect my source. Obviously, he's a tracker and therefore scum will want him gone asap. Surely you can understand the concept and reasoning behind my opinion regarding your hypothesis. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheIrishman Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 Just now, Jeod said: I have no problem abstaining from using it tonight. The caution comes from wanting to protect my source. Obviously, he's a tracker and therefore scum will want him gone asap. Surely you can understand the concept and reasoning behind my opinion regarding your hypothesis. But I already mentioned why it won't affect him. If he's a tracker, he can still track tonight. He might even be able to tell you the results, but you won't be able to post them until daytime. If not he might be able to tell you both results during the N3. Those are the only things that I could see being bad about it. It won't help narrow down who he is. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeod Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 Alright, so tell me then how this hypothesis gives us an advantage over scum? Knowing whether night actions cause tension doesn't hinder scum in any way that I can see. Instead, it makes us more anxious about using our own. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheIrishman Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 Just now, Jeod said: Alright, so tell me then how this hypothesis gives us an advantage over scum? Knowing whether night actions cause tension doesn't hinder scum in any way that I can see. Instead, it makes us more anxious about using our own. There's 2 main reasons to do so: 1. If someone has a useless action *cough* Jeod *cough cough* then we can prevent that person from using their ability to help lower WT. 2. To help clear you from being scum. As we know the media can give rise to all sorts of propaganda which can cause tension to increase in our world. There may be a similar system in this game. If you want to use being American as an excuse for innocence, this doesn't follow history. I could easily see Nod writing in a journalist (spy) trying to start a war in Europe to make a profit off weapon and supply sales. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeod Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 I think you're getting too detailed in the lore. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheIrishman Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 2 minutes ago, Jeod said: I think you're getting too detailed in the lore. Maybe, sometimes I read too much into things. But those are the reasons for it. If tension slows down from you refraining from using your ability, then there's a decent chance it's based on the amount of night actions. If the tension doesn't move at all, then there's a good chance you're scum. If the tension keeps the same rate or increases, than it's probably a scum's night action. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mojoman Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 Hey if I act consistent every game that's a good thing :D. To be honest I don't have much of a stake in this either way until the tension rises higher. I have no night actions unlocked at the moment. quote unquote You cannot use this (these) ability (ies) yet. And if you think that is a claim at neutral or some sort of third party (THE ANTARCTIC ARMY RISES?????) then you'd be mistaken. My only goal right now is to see what happens when my abilities unlock, which, while rising tension is obviously a scum goal, remember the starting post stated it can help town as well. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheIrishman Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 Hm...from that I think I think we should investigate Mojo on maybe the 3rd or 4th day. Since it seems like he could be a "dormant scum" I'm not sure he'll pop up as suspicious until his abilities are unlocked. But he's basically already marked himself as suspicious. He's still on my scum list, even higher now even, but we can't lynch yet so I think finding other potential scum players would be a wiser course of action as of right now. Wait...I momentarily forgot about evidence being dropped. Do you guys think he'd start out with evidence on him if he was scum? Or do you think we'd have to wait until he did a scum action for him to have trace amounts of evidence on him? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OrangeP47 Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 My only hangup is "if he was scum, why would he tell us all this?". The evidence dropping is what I'd focus on. Even if he's not scum, that sure sounds like the sort of setup where he'd drop evidence, even if he doesn't know he carries it, or something. It's certainly gotten my attention. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheIrishman Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 3 minutes ago, OrangeP47 said: My only hangup is "if he was scum, why would he tell us all this?". The evidence dropping is what I'd focus on. Even if he's not scum, that sure sounds like the sort of setup where he'd drop evidence, even if he doesn't know he carries it, or something. It's certainly gotten my attention. I thought about the hangup as well, but then again it's Mojo and it's hard to tell how his mind works. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeod Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 Mojoman still hasn't done anything worthwhile to make me put him on my scumdar, but I agree with investigating him D3 or D4. I still want you today, Irish, not necessarily because you seem scummy, but because like the reason I was voted D1, I want to know that I can trust you before putting stock in your thoughts. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheIrishman Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 I figured I would've proved myself to be Town when I pointed out how Cat5 should be Town. Otherwise how else could I have caught what he said? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeod Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 2 minutes ago, TheIrishman said: I figured I would've proved myself to be Town when I pointed out how Cat5 should be Town. Otherwise how else could I have caught what he said? What in particular are you referencing? I think we all believe Cat5 is town by his cooperating and in-depth analysis of the evidence locker and how it might work. His analysis made mention of things that would help town make better nominations--not something scum would want. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheIrishman Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 On 8/3/2017 at 10:40 PM, Category 5 Hurricane said: I think that might make sense, as I think it is possible for the investigation to be taken off track. On the other hand, planting evidence just means it can be found, and one of our win conditions is to find all evidence. I thought it was pretty obvious. If you don't understand, then I don't think you're Town. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeod Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 5 minutes ago, TheIrishman said: I thought it was pretty obvious. If you don't understand, then I don't think you're Town. Oh I understand. In fact, that statement is so obvious even scum could use it. Our objectives were pretty clearly stated in the day posts. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheIrishman Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 Check your PM. You think Cat5 would be so negligent to say all evidence even though our public objective clearly stated true evidence only and putting it into the correct box. If he was scum, I don't think he'd bet on that word choice to fool us and I wouldn't be aware of it if I were scum >.> 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeod Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 1 minute ago, TheIrishman said: Check your PM. You think Cat5 would be so negligent to say all evidence even though our public objective clearly stated true evidence only and putting it into the correct box. If he was scum, I don't think he'd bet on that word choice to fool us and I wouldn't be aware of it if I were scum >.> I think it's pathetic that you decided to out such sensitive information in a bid to peg me as Town or Warmonger when my alignment should be clear by now. You're so set on casting doubt on me that you failed to take into account that the objective wording could easily be used to test others. It's a rule breaker to do so, however, but your blind attack only makes me want to investigate you even more. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retaliation Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 On 8/2/2017 at 5:10 PM, Nodlied said: Find all evidence leading to the perpetrators and see if you can connect the dots and disregard all fake evidence. In hopes of forestalling further discussion about PM testing. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheIrishman Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 4 minutes ago, Retaliation said: In hopes of forestalling further discussion about PM testing. Guess I'll hold what I wrote for a defense even though it's hard to stomach libel. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OrangeP47 Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 In the spirit of cooperation, I'm most eager to learn more about Mojo, after what he's revealed, which might be a more pertinent place to look than this hubbub we have going on right now. Depending on how people act, we can always keep them on the reserve list. ##investigate Mojoman 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeod Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 5 minutes ago, OrangeP47 said: In the spirit of cooperation, I'm most eager to learn more about Mojo, after what he's revealed, which might be a more pertinent place to look than this hubbub we have going on right now. Depending on how people act, we can always keep them on the reserve list. ##investigate Mojoman Interesting that you're willing to cooperate so freely with Irish even though he hasn't been proven Town nor investigated himself, nor has he offered to be. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheIrishman Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 Just now, Jeod said: Interesting that you're willing to cooperate so freely with Irish even though he hasn't been proven Town nor investigated himself, nor has he offered to be. *facepalm* Not even gonna talk about until Nod catches up. 3 hours ago, TheIrishman said: If you guys want to investigate me I'm fine with it And proven wrong. I just think it'd be a waste. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeod Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 You're more dangerous than Mojoman in terms of scumplay, so I'm more inclined to investigate you next. Simple. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OrangeP47 Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 Just now, Jeod said: Interesting that you're willing to cooperate so freely with Irish even though he hasn't been proven Town nor investigated himself, nor has he offered to be. Didn't you say you wanted Irish D3 or D4? That implies someone else for D2, and Mojo's the best bet given what we have. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeod Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 I said Mojo for D3 or D4. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheIrishman Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 Just now, Jeod said: You're more dangerous than Mojoman in terms of scumplay, so I'm more inclined to investigate you next. Simple. I actually kind of feel a bit touched that the Scummiest Scum Who Ever Scummed thinks so highly of my scumplay. Granted I've only ever been scum for half a game. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OrangeP47 Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 Oh, well I must have misread that then :\ I'll keep my vote here though, while waiting for more opinions from the peanut gallery. I don't trust Irish, but that convo came off more like a series of misunderstandings than anything. I'd not be opposed to an investigation on Irish, but I feel as if the case for him requires a few more people to comment, though mostly because what's up with Mojo is just so much more... blatant... whatever it is. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retaliation Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 Having been on a scum team with mojo I don't think that's as much of a complement as you think it is . 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Category 5 Hurricane Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 @TheIrishman I was wondering what you were talking about when you decided I must be town because of what I said. I didn't think there was anything I said that could be taken as proof. Why couldn't scum know that they will lose if all the evidence is collected? (And "all the evidence" might mean "place all correct evidence in the truth box" and not just "find all the evidence") Personally, I doubt that Jeod's action is responsible for the tension increase, or at least not a significant part of it. I think that either three different actions added 3%, or 9 actions added 1%. The latter would mean everyone's action adds 1% when used. We might be able to learn over time which of these it is, and if we do, we might be able to catch out liars. This reminds me of something else that FRAYDO said: 13 hours ago, FRAYDO said: It's a good guess that Jeod's ability may have raised the world tension, but Jeod himself should know if it does or not. If it does, I would like some confirmation on that from our American reporter. Now, I have to ask, does anyone else know that their action adds to world tension, because I sure don't. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheIrishman Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 Just now, Retaliation said: Having been on a scum team with mojo I don't think that's as much of a complement as you think it is . I didn't, it was pure sarcasm. ##Investigate TheIrishman 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.