Jump to content

[GAME OVER] CYOR - Supernatural Edition


TheIrishman

Recommended Posts

iLikeToSnipe could not be killed by the Death Note. Shinigami Eyes worked by letting you see a player's True Identity, allowing them to kill the player by writing their player name. Since iLTS didn't have a True Identity, Shinigami Eyes couldn't ever kill him.

Shade, the thing is, Nodlied could've stolen a revival ability, vengeful ability/nameless, and a tracker ability.

He had a lot of potential, and his kills had armor piercing against any undead, so a lot of the protections would've sliced through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ChopBam got redirected from targeting Orange. My initial intentions for curseproof was a defense against a TP or Scum Retaliation, but it ended up only protecting against the Contract on the Death Note.

The ability was meant to stop ChopBam from gaining any curses, not being affected by someone else who has a curse. In hindsight, that was my fault, apologies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheIrishman said:

ChopBam got redirected from targeting Orange. My initial intentions for curseproof was a defense against a TP or Scum Retaliation, but it ended up only protecting against the Contract on the Death Note.

The ability was meant to stop ChopBam from gaining any curses, not being affected by someone else who has a curse. In hindsight, that was my fault, apologies.

A little wordplay trouble, eh? I don't think Chop having the correct track report would have changed the game too much, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OrangeP47 said:

I think you think you're more clever than you really are.  Not impressed.

Know what was really clever though? Making ChopBam think Category 5 could speak to players he revived in order to secure the lynch on Verti60.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jeod said:

A little wordplay trouble, eh? I don't think Chop having the correct track report would have changed the game too much, though.

Yeah that ended up being a big side discussion, but the vote never went that way thankfully.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, VERTi60 said:

Is this your defense? I was literary the only other guy besides Shade to cast most suspicion on you :p

And it didn't work :v

Just now, Shade939 said:

By the way @OrangeP47, what did you think of those two exclamation points Sunflower left in the Death Note. :p

I didn't look that closely, I was more hung up on you getting the eyes thus being undefended :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, VERTi60 said:

Is this your defense? I was literary the only other guy besides Shade to cast most suspicion on you :p

For a while I was posing a case where he could be a scum jailer, where the "protection" thing was meant to keep information away from town. And after Nodlied's flip, I was even more sure on Orange's being scum. Oh, you mean "literally" as "figuratively," ok. But still, I was quite suspicious of Orange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OrangeP47 said:

And it didn't work :v

I mean, I'm ok with that, I wasn't town :p I would feel a bit salty if I was. All I wanted to do is prevent delaying the game by more days, otherwise it had no effect on my win/troll conditions 😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OrangeP47 said:

I didn't look that closely, I was more hung up on you getting the eyes thus being undefended :p

That almost immediately narrowed the suspect pool down to Chopbam and Sunflower, plus here response to the mummification Death with Verti.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Shade939 said:

That almost immediately narrowed the suspect pool down to Chopbam and Sunflower, plus here response to the mummification Death with Verti.

Verti trying to cast Shade on me for it when he knew damn well it wasn't me is also not appreciated :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, I did want to point out, Shade, that I made Scum's objective to equal or exceed everyone in votes as opposed to the player count. Therefore, it being the night, there is no vote count, allowing the night phase to go on through. That being said, for most games if there's some way for Town to come back (i.e. a day vigilante, vote change, revive) the game continues.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheIrishman said:

Oh, I did want to point out, Shade, that I made Scum's objective to equal or exceed everyone in votes as opposed to the player count. Therefore, it being the night, there is no vote count, allowing the night phase to go on through. That being said, for most games if there's some way for Town to come back (i.e. a day vigilante, vote change, revive) the game continues.

 

In APB Chat Mafia script, my script also counts BP actions as well (since they can kill people). So if there's still town left with BP action that could even the odds, scum will not win automatically. So cheers on thinking that vote mechanic through as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheIrishman said:

Oh, I did want to point out, Shade, that I made Scum's objective to equal or exceed everyone in votes as opposed to the player count. Therefore, it being the night, there is no vote count, allowing the night phase to go on through. That being said, for most games if there's some way for Town to come back (i.e. a day vigilante, vote change, revive) the game continues.

 

I'm against that, it's so much harder for Scum to counteract those abilities late game, that they should really be rewarded for managing to deceive Town long enough to reach that point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jeod said:

Since we're getting everything on the table...the missing thread thing was a misclick right?

There were issues with the forum board entire morning and I'm not really sure what happened. I got it fixed with OWA though relatively quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...