Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Jeod said:

Most likely a bunch of misses. The odds are pretty low this time around.

I'd assume the odds would be similar to the last version of this though?

Posted
Just now, Shade939 said:

I'd assume the odds would be similar to the last version of this though?

More roles with 25%, lowers the overall kill chances.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Jeod said:

Most likely a bunch of misses. The odds are pretty low this time around.

Well yes, but assuming someone DID hit.  Though to be fair a few days ago I did berate Shade for not being specific enough, so fair point.

Posted

Having a bunch of roles listed that must not be in the game also greatly reduces the effectiveness of the statistical analysis we've done over the last few games. I don't know if I'll even bother with it.

Posted
Just now, Category 5 Hurricane said:

Having a bunch of roles listed that must not be in the game also greatly reduces the effectiveness of the statistical analysis we've done over the last few games. I don't know if I'll even bother with it.

I'm going to pretend Shade said this for my daily allotment of 5 minutes of happiness.

Posted
1 minute ago, Category 5 Hurricane said:

Having a bunch of roles listed that must not be in the game also greatly reduces the effectiveness of the statistical analysis we've done over the last few games. I don't know if I'll even bother with it.

I'm not bothering with it. I mostly consider it a list of role claims for Scum to make.

Posted
2 minutes ago, OrangeP47 said:

I'm going to pretend Shade said this for my daily allotment of 5 minutes of happiness.

 

Just now, Shade939 said:

I'm not bothering with it. I mostly consider it a list of role claims for Scum to make.

Your wish has been granted.

Posted
Just now, Category 5 Hurricane said:

Probably more useful for scum than town. Maybe late game it might be possible to indicate someone is lying.

If we catch a counterclaim sure or a power role catches Scum acting scummy, and they don't get unlucky with that report and Nod managed to mess it up somehow...

Posted

The table provides us with the means to get paranoid without any actual proof, which is a nice dynamic from a game design point of view.  I know you hate it, Shade, but we'll all have to actually make *gasp* arguments!

Posted
1 minute ago, OrangeP47 said:

The table provides us with the means to get paranoid without any actual proof, which is a nice dynamic from a game design point of view.  I know you hate it, Shade, but we'll all have to actually make *gasp* arguments!

But Shade loves arguing.

Posted
Just now, OrangeP47 said:

The table provides us with the means to get paranoid without any actual proof, which is a nice dynamic from a game design point of view.  I know you hate it, Shade, but we'll all have to actually make *gasp* arguments!

It's a very easy setup for Scum, so if they lose it should be because of meta reasoning.

Posted
Just now, Retaliation said:

But Shade loves arguing.

Remember two games ago when he renounced arguing in favor of stats 4 lyfe.

Honestly, this 180 now should be insta scum read from all of us :v

Posted
1 minute ago, OrangeP47 said:

Remember two games ago when he renounced arguing in favor of stats 4 lyfe.

Honestly, this 180 now should be insta scum read from all of us :v

##Unvote OrangeP47

I find it annoying that that's what I consider significant meta analysis to suggest Orange isn't Scum.

Posted
4 minutes ago, OrangeP47 said:

Remember two games ago when he renounced arguing in favor of stats 4 lyfe.

Honestly, this 180 now should be insta scum read from all of us :v

If you think about it stats were a means to figure out the game, except scum start the game with everything mostly figured out...

Posted

And like... when I said Shade was being anti-fun... and then said I had a slight scum read cause of it... that wasn't just memeing.  He's generally more serious when he's scum.

Posted
Just now, OrangeP47 said:

And like... when I said Shade was being anti-fun... and then said I had a slight scum read cause of it... that wasn't just memeing.  He's generally more serious when he's scum.

I say this based off the game I was high on pain killers and watched him lemming into the void :v

Posted
3 minutes ago, Retaliation said:

If you think about it stats were a means to figure out the game, except scum start the game with everything mostly figured out...

And limited options that they can't counter because of the stats. For this game we have a wide scale of possibilities to deal with.

1 minute ago, OrangeP47 said:

Yeah to be fair that's not very neutral of you Cat 5 :colbert:

I'm actually noted just how much Category 5 doesn't scum read me these past games, it's actually thrown me off a bit...

Posted
8 minutes ago, Shade939 said:

##Unvote OrangeP47

I find it annoying that that's what I consider significant meta analysis to suggest Orange isn't Scum.

No, this isn't how Town!Shade works. Someone meta reads you as scum, you tunnel them hard.

Posted

I actually don't like Orange's meta read on you either. That is to say, I don't think it was a good reason to meta read you as scum, and your reaction to it was the opposite of what I would expect.

Posted
Just now, Category 5 Hurricane said:

No, this isn't how Town!Shade works. Someone meta reads you as scum, you tunnel them hard.

 

3 minutes ago, Category 5 Hurricane said:

No, this isn't how Town!Shade works. Someone meta reads you as scum, you tunnel them hard.

What's your analysis on Orange?

Posted
Just now, Category 5 Hurricane said:

I actually don't like Orange's meta read on you either. That is to say, I don't think it was a good reason to meta read you as scum, and your reaction to it was the opposite of what I would expect.

Yeah, I expect better from him if he's Scum.

Posted
Just now, Shade939 said:

 

What's your analysis on Orange?

Not sure why you quoted the same post twice, but Orange is a slight scum read. Which is probably my default for him.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...