VERTi60 Posted August 9, 2017 Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 Then why did you put him out of the list? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeod Posted August 9, 2017 Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 Because as he has no evidence on him, his probability of being a scum is low. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VERTi60 Posted August 9, 2017 Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 Is that a claim or somebody confirmed it? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeod Posted August 9, 2017 Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 13 minutes ago, VERTi60 said: Is that a claim or somebody confirmed it? I have half a mind to throw this grenade at you. You're a great GM, but you're terrible as a player. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VERTi60 Posted August 9, 2017 Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 You are a known liar and deceiver so you have to understand I question everything you put up 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeod Posted August 9, 2017 Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 Just now, VERTi60 said: You are a known liar and deceiver so you have to understand I question everything you put up That has nothing to do with the fact that you can't read what Cat5 has said literally this day only. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VERTi60 Posted August 9, 2017 Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 Well you only assume that thief has to have evidence. Maybe he doesn't until he steals something? (maybe that goes with the suspicion level too?) Maybe that's why the thing got stolen in the first place so that the thief is safe from another investigation. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Category 5 Hurricane Posted August 9, 2017 Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 I have to agree with VERTi60 to a degree with what he's saying. One thing that bothers me is that we've found one piece of evidence so far, and that one gave us 10%. That means there should be ten pieces of it. That means there is enough for each of us to be holding one, yet between investigating two people and me searching 2 other people, we've only found one. This makes me think that not all evidence is "on the field" at the same time. Either that or there are three people who hold more than one piece of evidence. Now, Jeod, I should ask here, did you move the evidence into the truth locker? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeod Posted August 9, 2017 Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 I did not. I didn't know if it was a true piece. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Category 5 Hurricane Posted August 9, 2017 Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 Well, the other theory I had is that the percentage might move up more if true evidence is moved to the truth locker, which would reduce the number of pieces of evidence we need to find. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VERTi60 Posted August 9, 2017 Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 I think the evidence will essentially be given once the said person has done some sort of deed that will make up for it. So if we catch the thief today we'll get a lot more evidence. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VERTi60 Posted August 9, 2017 Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 That's the only logical explanation unless the warmongers hold bigger pieces. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeod Posted August 9, 2017 Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 ##investigate Killing You Throwing a grenade into the vault because you didn't want to be caught with it can only point to a suspicious status. If you were using N1 to get rid of the grenade, then there could be no theft N1. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OrangeP47 Posted August 9, 2017 Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 1 hour ago, Category 5 Hurricane said: I have to agree with VERTi60 to a degree with what he's saying. One thing that bothers me is that we've found one piece of evidence so far, and that one gave us 10%. That means there should be ten pieces of it. That means there is enough for each of us to be holding one, yet between investigating two people and me searching 2 other people, we've only found one. This makes me think that not all evidence is "on the field" at the same time. Either that or there are three people who hold more than one piece of evidence. Now, Jeod, I should ask here, did you move the evidence into the truth locker? This is bothering me too. We're kind of at process of elimination right now, and as I've made it abundantly clear, I favor going after people who I think have evidence. However, we've found people with no evidence, and you've been saying certain people have no evidence, including who was my prime suspect, so to speak. This casts doubt not only on those people being good picks to find evidence (obbviously), but my entire methodology, so I'm kind of somewhat at a loss. If Mojo has no evidence I would have said move on to Retaliation, but obviously my logic is flawed somewhere so I'm just not sure anymore. Also, keep in mind, I don't think having evidence = being scum, but again, even that now is in question. TL;DR: I'm very concerned about this lack of evidence compared to the number of players. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeod Posted August 9, 2017 Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 Is anyone okay with using the grenade on FRAYDO? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OrangeP47 Posted August 9, 2017 Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 That's rather drastic, but I can see the reasoning. I honestly think we could maybe get some more information out of him, but unfortunately I don't trust him to answer honestly. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VERTi60 Posted August 9, 2017 Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 1 hour ago, Jeod said: Is anyone okay with using the grenade on FRAYDO? Maybe you should do RNG first to make it fair for him. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FRAYDO Posted August 9, 2017 Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 15 hours ago, Killing You said: It has a small chance of killing someone and a higher chance to roleblock. 2 hours ago, Jeod said: Is anyone okay with using the grenade on FRAYDO? I suppose I should hope for the roleblock chance than outright death. Given that small chance of death and my estranged relationship with RNGesus, I would rather you just investigate and lock me up again than proceed with what is very much a hostile action. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Category 5 Hurricane Posted August 9, 2017 Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 I am against it. I think that would raise tension quite a bit, and I bet we can win this game without killing anybody, as long as we find all evidence. Weapons should only be used if we will otherwise fail to find all evidence. Last resort. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VERTi60 Posted August 9, 2017 Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 What if the thief steals the Grenade though? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeod Posted August 9, 2017 Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 Just now, Category 5 Hurricane said: I am against it. I think that would raise tension quite a bit, and I bet we can win this game without killing anybody, as long as we find all evidence. Weapons should only be used if we will otherwise fail to find all evidence. Last resort. I was just reading through things again and I actually think knowing whether we can trust Retaliation would be a good thing for today. What say you? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Category 5 Hurricane Posted August 9, 2017 Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 I have a slight town read on Retal right now. If we look at the list of people that could be the thief, and the list of people who we know absolutely nothing about, Chaos_Knight is on both lists. I'm leaning in his direction. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Category 5 Hurricane Posted August 9, 2017 Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 3 minutes ago, VERTi60 said: What if the thief steals the Grenade though? We can hot potato it around. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retaliation Posted August 9, 2017 Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 I will come up as suspicious, will lose my item, and we'll be in a similar situation to where we are with FRAYDO (suspect alignment but cannot know). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeod Posted August 9, 2017 Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 I'm more inclined to use it actually. The less chance a thief gets his hands on this, the better. Plus, CK apparently doesn't have the time to be more helpful and cooperative. I doubt it would raise tension that much, and even if it does, we may get more actions to find our scum. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VERTi60 Posted August 9, 2017 Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 1 minute ago, Category 5 Hurricane said: We can hot potato it around. That never worked up well (Dead Space Shard or Death Note) but it's up to Jeod to decide. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeod Posted August 9, 2017 Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 Just now, VERTi60 said: That never worked up well (Dead Space Shard or Death Note) but it's up to Jeod to decide. I can always blindside KY again. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nodlied Posted August 9, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 3 hours ago, Jeod said: ##investigate Killing You Counted 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retaliation Posted August 9, 2017 Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 If we're going to I'd rather we resolve our questions on who FRAYDO is. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Category 5 Hurricane Posted August 9, 2017 Report Share Posted August 9, 2017 I'd rather not use it at all, but if we do, hit FRAYDO. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.