Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Right, so one thing I want to know is if everyone else has similar starting stats, so is anyone else paying 80 gold for the raven messengers?

Posted
2 minutes ago, OrangeP47 said:

I don't want to spill too many beans, but that's innocent enough.  That is indeed the cost for me.

Hugh, and would you call them expensive to use?

Posted
Just now, Shade939 said:

Hugh, and would you call them expensive to use?

Yeah but if you're going to argue with verti I don't think you're going to win.

Posted
Just now, OrangeP47 said:

Yeah but if you're going to argue with verti I don't think you're going to win.

Just wanted an estimate of what gold income was per player, to balance out trade deals.

Posted
1 minute ago, Shade939 said:

Just wanted an estimate of what gold income was per player, to balance out trade deals.

I assume by D3 or D4 most of us will at least have had the opportunity to have more gold than we know what to do with.  Not saying we WILL, but we'll have had the CHANCE.

Posted
1 minute ago, OrangeP47 said:

I assume by D3 or D4 most of us will at least have had the opportunity to have more gold than we know what to do with.  Not saying we WILL, but we'll have had the CHANCE.

So, about those mutually beneficial trade deals that we should be capable of making at some point? ;)

Posted
Just now, Shade939 said:

So, about those mutually beneficial trade deals that we should be capable of making at some point? ;)

Maybe. It's too soon to commit to anything :p

Posted
15 minutes ago, Louis said:

My vote will stay on Shade he'd the safest bet, I don't trust Voe

Hello there.

Posted
23 minutes ago, Louis said:

Well I almost forgot you there, Jeod, tell me about your policies

 

I just gave them. However, I must admit that I don’t have a clue how else it might benefit us. It depends on what the king can do. At the moment though I believe that doubling our army during conflicts is a huge pro and a deterrent to any rebellion actions.

Posted
45 minutes ago, Jeod said:

I just gave them. However, I must admit that I don’t have a clue how else it might benefit us. It depends on what the king can do. At the moment though I believe that doubling our army during conflicts is a huge pro and a deterrent to any rebellion actions.

Yeah building armies is good, also do you need money to build armies? I'm guess yea

Posted
46 minutes ago, OrangeP47 said:

So where is @TheIrishman and others?

I stopped checking daily for this game a bit less than a month ago and that's the only reason I visit this site >.>

I'm all for Shade or Voe being king seeing as either will most likely be deposed right away. That said, I do have full intentions on becoming king myself afterwards. But for now, call me Lord Bronn ;)

Posted
Just now, OrangeP47 said:

Soldiers want to be paid regardless of conversion rate :p

One of those might be vastly  harder to acquire than the other. :p

Posted
Just now, Shade939 said:

One of those might be vastly  harder to acquire than the other. :p

You ever not pay your mercenaries in CK2 Shade? :p

Posted
20 minutes ago, OrangeP47 said:

I think economy first, army second.

I promise to have both covered. Can't win the war against the dead without the merc money, can we?

Posted
47 minutes ago, Voe said:

I promise to have both covered. Can't win the war against the dead without the merc money, can we?

Sounds like a Democrat. Too many promises.

Posted
Just now, Louis said:

If I am voted king I'll put you all to work at the wall

I think that's only an action that can happen to people that get voted as outed rebels/overthrown kings, at least from the early description if it hasn't changed.

Posted
Just now, OrangeP47 said:

I think that's only an action that can happen to people that get voted as outed rebels/overthrown kings, at least from the early description if it hasn't changed.

Hahaha yeah I know that, I just don't want to be king

Posted
Just now, Louis said:

Hahaha yeah I know that, I just don't want to be king

Weren't you the one complaining more people needed to want to be king rather than people wanting to not be king? Do you not follow your own advice? :p

Posted

That said, Shade was supposed to be the economy candidate, which is why I'm disappointed he's waffling now.  If nobody takes up that mantle I'd put forth my own name but it's almost too late at this juncture and as I said I don't particularly want to, but I'm firmly in the economy first camp.

Posted
9 minutes ago, OrangeP47 said:

Weren't you the one complaining more people needed to want to be king rather than people wanting to not be king? Do you not follow your own advice? :p

What I meant was that we should focus on choosing a king unanimously

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...