Games [GAME OVER] Tiberian Sun: Reborn Mafia II

[OrangeP47]

2 minutes ago, Category 5 Hurricane said:

I actually don't like Orange's meta read on you either. That is to say, I don't think it was a good reason to meta read you as scum, and your reaction to it was the opposite of what I would expect.

I mean it was kind of a joke.

[Category5]

3 minutes ago, Category 5 Hurricane said:

Then why did you unvote for that?

Nevermind, I misread that.

[Category5]

17 minutes ago, OrangeP47 said:

And like... when I said Shade was being anti-fun... and then said I had a slight scum read cause of it... that wasn't just memeing.  He's generally more serious when he's scum.

But you said it wasn't.

[Shade939]

3 minutes ago, Category 5 Hurricane said:

Then why did you unvote for that?

Why did I vote him in the place?

[Louis]

Sad, that I missed but it is to be expected tho. 

[OrangeP47]

1 minute ago, Category 5 Hurricane said:

But you said it wasn't.

The specific comment about "we should all scum read him for this 180" was originally a joke" but the fact that I if I had to pull a scum name out of my hat Shade would be one of my top suspects isn't a joke.

[Shade939]

Just now, Shade939 said:

Why did I vote him in the place?

Edit: Why did I vote for him in the first place?

[OrangeP47]

1 minute ago, Louis said:

Sad, that I missed but it is to be expected tho. 

"Sad"

[Category5]

Just now, Shade939 said:

Why did I vote him in the place?

I don't know, I don't have a Shade's Reasoning Tracker(TM)

[Shade939]

Just now, Category 5 Hurricane said:

I don't know, I don't have a Shade's Reasoning Tracker(TM)

Well, why did you feel the need to immediately vote up a player after the only vote cast so far had been removed?

[Category5]

1 minute ago, Shade939 said:

Well, why did you feel the need to immediately vote up a player after the only vote cast so far had been removed?

Because I expected you to view Orange's scum read on you as poor and react negatively, not by removing the vote.

[OrangeP47]

1 minute ago, Category 5 Hurricane said:

Because I expected you to view Orange's scum read on you as poor and react negatively, not by removing the vote.

He could be trying to pocket me... it works sometimes, and he probably knows it by now.

[Jeod]

Did I read "Shade is scummy" somewhere?

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Jeod said:

Did I read "Shade is scummy" somewhere?

Well yes, that is every game... it's just a rarity we actually care

[Shade939]

Just now, Jeod said:

Did I read "Shade is scummy" somewhere?

Did you really have to read that? 

[Shade939]

6 minutes ago, Category 5 Hurricane said:

Because I expected you to view Orange's scum read on you as poor and react negatively, not by removing the vote.

And that equates to needing a day one lynch because?

[Category5]

1 minute ago, Shade939 said:

And that equates to needing a day one lynch because?

Have any thoughts on what he's inferring, Jeod?

[Jeod]

3 minutes ago, Category 5 Hurricane said:

Have any thoughts on what he's inferring, Jeod?

It looks like some form of Elvish.

[Jeod]

Serious answer: He doesn't think unvoting Orange is a big deal, despite you expecting him to omgus.

[OrangeP47]

5 minutes ago, Category 5 Hurricane said:

Have any thoughts on what he's inferring, Jeod?

What were our thoughts on this matter last game (not the game before that), because I honestly forgot... unfortunately...

[Category5]

Just now, OrangeP47 said:

What were our thoughts on this matter last game (not the game before that), because I honestly forgot... unfortunately...

Which matter?

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Category 5 Hurricane said:

Which matter?

I got the implication Shade seemingly is implying for no lynch, which is a bizarre take to suddenly have, but maybe I'm misreading what he means (I wonder how that could happen)

[Shade939]

1 minute ago, OrangeP47 said:

I got the implication Shade seemingly is implying for no lynch, which is a bizarre take to suddenly have, but maybe I'm misreading what he means (I wonder how that could happen)

The logic is the same as it was the last time I explained it...

[Category5]

Just now, OrangeP47 said:

I got the implication Shade seemingly is implying for no lynch, which is a bizarre take to suddenly have, but maybe I'm misreading what he means (I wonder how that could happen)

Indeed, because nobody has mentioned that yet, but Shade is trying to say that I'm taking a position on an issue that wasn't stated.

And, last game I voted iLTS out over nolynch. I don't remember why, but I do remember that it came down to him and nolynch, and I guessed that when D1 is close, scum is among the votes, and nolynch was the other option, so iLTS was probably scum. He was.

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Shade939 said:

The logic is the same as it was the last time I explained it...

And as I said, either I forgot or I wasn't paying attention.

[Category5]

If Shade wants a repeat of that scenario, I wouldn't mind.

[OrangeP47]

1 minute ago, Category 5 Hurricane said:

Indeed, because nobody has mentioned that yet, but Shade is trying to say that I'm taking a position on an issue that wasn't stated.

And, last game I voted iLTS out over nolynch. I don't remember why, but I do remember that it came down to him and nolynch, and I guessed that when D1 is close, scum is among the votes, and nolynch was the other option, so iLTS was probably scum. He was.

Oh yeah, I was scum but voted ILTS because I boxed myself into hating no lynch because that's my meta in non-CYOR games lol

[Category5]

Just now, OrangeP47 said:

Oh yeah, I was scum but voted ILTS because I boxed myself into hating no lynch because that's my meta in non-CYOR games lol

Oh, that's right, iLTS voted nolynch even though he always argues against it.

[Retaliation]

Is shade normally pro or anti no lynch?

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Category 5 Hurricane said:

Oh, that's right, iLTS voted nolynch even though he always argues against it.

He also pulled a "attack one person, vote someone else" which is a classic scum tell and he's done that several times and I always call people on that.