Games [GAME OVER] CYOR IV

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Shade939 said:

I don't have any reason to think the information will support his theory...

Do you have any reason to think the information won't support his theory?  At this stage of the game, you probably don't have the info to make a call one way or another, which is why it's so odd you're acting like you DO know something the rest of us don't...

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Shade939 said:

But I am aware that information is guaranteed to help scum.

Because the optimal way for town to win is to play blindfolded darts, got it.

[Shade939]

1 minute ago, OrangeP47 said:

Because the optimal way for town to win is to play blindfolded darts, got it. 

So, you want iLTS to wait to reveal his story until after everyone else has spoken up then?

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Shade939 said:

So, you want iLTS to wait to reveal his story until after everyone else has spoken up then?

Sometimes it's a good idea, if you can catch scum in a lie.  There are many, MANY times where I know something but I don't say anything until after everyone else has checked in.

[OrangeP47]

I mean hell, I've disagreed with ILTS playstyle a lot recently, mostly because he's been agro on me these past few games for the wrong reason, but this is totally something out of my own playbook, so I see nothing wrong with it.

[Shade939]

Just now, OrangeP47 said:

Sometimes it's a good idea, if you can catch scum in a lie.  There are many, MANY times where I know something but I don't say anything until after everyone else has checked in.

How long do you think it's going to be before everyone checks in to start with?

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Shade939 said:

How long do you think it's going to be before everyone checks in to start with?

We have two days, patience.  That's a bad argument to make.

[Shade939]

Just now, OrangeP47 said:

We have two days, patience.  That's a bad argument to make.

I'd prefer to not wait for undefined reasons, before we actually get around to discussing anything.

For all you know, iLTS is going to claim someone role blocked him, and his character was possessed to perform the NK...

And how do you think a discussion like that would play out?

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Shade939 said:

I'd prefer to not wait for undefined reasons, before we actually get around to discussing anything.

For all you know, iLTS is going to claim someone role blocked him, and his character was possessed to perform the NK...

And how do you think a discussion like that would play out?

You're free to talk about other things, we can multi-task.

I also find that eventuality very unlikely.  You might have a good career as M. Night Shyamalan''s understudy though.

[iLikeToSnipe]

2 minutes ago, Shade939 said:

For all you know, iLTS is going to claim someone role blocked him, and his character was possessed to perform the NK...

[ChopBam]

While OrangeP47 and Shade are arguing like two little lovebirds (I love to see lovebirds, it's cute, like really cute), I'm sitting here still laughing about how smug Verti60 got taken out last game.

[Shade939]

4 minutes ago, OrangeP47 said:

You're free to talk about other things, we can multi-task.

I also find that eventuality very unlikely.  You might have a good career as M. Night Shyamalan''s understudy though.

So, why do you think iLTS is asking if someone saw who he visited and if someone visited him then?

[OrangeP47]

1 minute ago, Shade939 said:

So, why do you think iLTS is asking if someone saw who he visited and if someone visited him then?

It's pretty obvious what he's doing, and that's not what he's asking.  He's asking if anyone saw who visited HIM.

[Shade939]

Answer, he didn't so I need to take a second to reread what he said...

 

[Shade939]

Just now, OrangeP47 said:

It's pretty obvious what he's doing, and that's not what he's asking.  He's asking if anyone saw who visited HIM.

Naturally though, I'm still skeptical that anyone other than whoever performed the NK would be aware of why the NK failed at this point.

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Shade939 said:

Naturally though, I'm still skeptical that anyone other than whoever performed the NK would be aware of why the NK failed at this point.

If ILTS had NK protection and got informed it was broken, it would be rather obvious why he'd ask if anyone saw who visited him...

[Shade939]

Just now, OrangeP47 said:

If ILTS had NK protection and got informed it was broken, it would be rather obvious why he'd ask if anyone saw who visited him...

Then why doesn't he simply claim that already?

[OrangeP47]

1 minute ago, Shade939 said:

Then why doesn't he simply claim that already?

There are several possible reasons why.

[Shade939]

Just now, OrangeP47 said:

There are several possible reasons why.

In case Mafia are unaware that the NK failed?

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Shade939 said:

In case Mafia are unaware that the NK failed?

That's probably not one of the reasons....

[iLikeToSnipe]

REPORTS:

• OrangeP47 - nothing
• Killing_You - nothing
• TheIrishman - nothing
• ChopBam - nothing

As a reminder, I need to know if anybody watched me or tracked anybody to me. Just a simple "yes" or "no" will suffice.

@Shade939

@Category 5 Hurricane

@FRAYDO

@Nodlied

[iLikeToSnipe]

There are uncountable possibilities as to what could have happened. I could also be lying about knowing anything and trying to get scum to slip up. Who knows?

What does matter is that I just need to know what information could be out there from last night regarding some stuff that I did or happened to me. I intend to give full details once I've heard back from the other players.

[ChopBam]

6 minutes ago, Shade939 said:

In case Mafia are unaware that the NK failed?

Any dingus who can read the day's opening post can see that the nightkill failed....

[Shade939]

Just now, ChopBam said:

Any dingus who can read the day's opening post can see that the nightkill failed....

Yes, so what is iLTS actually hiding from who then?

[iLikeToSnipe]

Just now, Shade939 said:

Yes, so what is iLTS actually hiding from who then?

I'm trying to make it harder for scum to lie and cause trouble.

[Shade939]

2 minutes ago, iLikeToSnipe said:

I'm trying to make it harder for scum to lie and cause trouble.

That would require us to establish an alibi for everyone in game in that case, and figure out if those alibis were false.

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Shade939 said:

That would require us to establish an alibi for everyone in game in that case, and figure out if those alibis were false.

Not really.

[iLikeToSnipe]

Just now, Shade939 said:

That would require us to establish an alibi for everyone in game in that case, and figure out if those alibis were false.

I'm going to assume your answer is "no". But please just answer "yes" or "no" if you watched me last night or tracked anybody who visited me.

[ChopBam]

Just now, OrangeP47 said:

Not really.

Are you like the one-man peanut gallery?

[OrangeP47]

1 minute ago, ChopBam said:

Are you like the one-man peanut gallery?

I swing back and forth between apathy and annoyance when these rants happen