Games [GAME OVER] CYOR: Nintendo Edition

[Nodlied]

Just now, Category 5 Hurricane said:

Grammatically, his post was more likely to refer to iLTS, that's why I asked.

[Category5]

1 minute ago, Nodlied said:

Grammatically, his post was more likely to refer to iLTS, that's why I asked.

Yes, well, it seemed like he was having trouble understanding, so I figured someone should clap for him.

[Shade939]

13 minutes ago, Nodlied said:

Czech out what action iLTS described about me.

I believe he called you Super Warrior Man, so I don't really recall him being that specific.

I'm assuming your ability is obviously focused on what items a player has.

[Nodlied]

Just now, Shade939 said:

I believe he called you Super Warrior Man, so I don't really recall him being that specific.

I'm assuming your ability is obviously focused on what items a player has.

My first action allows me to role-block a person during the night and silence them during the day but conditions have to be met in order to get it. My second action allows me to do something in regards to items, yes. Specifically I search if somebody has the treasure I crave. And I take it if they have it. I also get a list of all the items that they possess at that moment in time.

[Shade939]

Just now, Nodlied said:

My first action allows me to role-block a person during the night and silence them during the day but conditions have to be met in order to get it. My second action allows me to do something in regards to items, yes. Specifically I search if somebody has the treasure I crave. And I take it if they have it. I also get a list of all the items that they possess at that moment in time.

And you searched him which night though?

[Nodlied]

Just now, Shade939 said:

And you searched him which night though?

Last night. Aka, N2.

[Shade939]

Just now, Nodlied said:

Last night. Aka, N2.

That is circumstantial evidence at best then. But does establish an obvious link with Verti who was killed.

[Nodlied]

Just now, Shade939 said:

That is circumstantial evidence at best then. But does establish an obvious link with Verti who was killed.

Why is it circumstantial?

[Killing_You]

Just now, Shade939 said:

That is circumstantial evidence at best then. But does establish an obvious link with Verti who was killed.

Indeed it is. But put it together with the fact that ChopBam omitted it from his report on the items he had.

[Shade939]

1 minute ago, Nodlied said:

Why is it circumstantial?

Can you prove Verti didn't use his night action to give him a BP item before he died?

[Killing_You]

You're asking all the wrong questions and derailing the investigation.

[Nodlied]

Just now, Shade939 said:

Can you prove Verti didn't use his night action to give him a BP item before he died?

I would have if Verti would ironically have lived, as he would have been silenced. My 1st action also blocks a player during that night in addition to silencing them during the day. I don't think Verti would have been able to pass a 1-up if he got blocked by me.

[Shade939]

Just now, Nodlied said:

I would have if Verti would ironically have lived, as he would have been silenced. My 1st action also blocks a player during that night in addition to silencing them during the day. I don't think Verti would have been able to pass a 1-up if he got blocked by me.

And that eliminates the circumstances and makes definitive proof then.

[Shade939]

It also means we do indeed have another player who had to make the NK.

[Category5]

Why couldn't ChopBam do both kills?

[Shade939]

4 minutes ago, Shade939 said:

It also means we do indeed have another player who had to make the NK.

Or not, since I'm getting the two abilities confused and thinking you blocked him last night.

[Nodlied]

Just now, Shade939 said:

Or not, since I'm getting the two abilities confused and thinking you blocked him last night.

I blocked Vert N1. I searched ChopBam N2.

[Shade939]

1 minute ago, Nodlied said:

I blocked Vert N1. I searched ChopBam N2.

Yep, that's what I'm actually trying to state. 

[ChopBam]

Oh yeah forgot about the 1-up, it's an extra life.

[ChopBam]

When asked for items I only thought of things I could do actions with and forgot that one. It's not a big deal anyway, does exactly what it sounds like and I have no idea where it came from.

[ChopBam]

The 1-up was merely passed to me N1.

[Nodlied]

Just now, ChopBam said:

The 1-up was merely passed to me N1.

I doubt it.

[ChopBam]

1 minute ago, Nodlied said:

I doubt it.

And why is that, pray tell?

[Nodlied]

Just now, ChopBam said:

And why is that, pray tell?

I suggest you read the past page or two.

[Shade939]

1 minute ago, Nodlied said:

I doubt it.

Unless Category 5 or Louis is lying about their role and abilities, since they're unproven.

But that's if the obvious answer is incorrect.

[Shade939]

And that just means those players should prove their actions or abilities/investigated since I don't think we can deal with Chopbam right now.

[Louis]

3 minutes ago, Shade939 said:

Unless Category 5 or Louis is lying about their role and abilities, since they're unproven.

But that's if the obvious answer is incorrect.

What's the question?

[Louis]

I don't know how to prove who I am

[Shade939]

1 minute ago, Louis said:

I don't know how to prove who I am

If you have a day action you can safely use that's not a one-shot, that would be the way to prove it right now. Otherwise using a night action on someone that fits your characters flavor. Or just let one of our multiple investigative roles try to figure it out for instead by their actions.

[Category5]

I don't think you need to prove it right now. Don't let Shade pressure you into doing so needlessly.