Games {Game Over} {CYOR} Spooky Scary Scumhunting

[ChopBam]

@Louis Who are your top suspects right now?

[Louis]

3 minutes ago, ChopBam said:

Is there anything in your role, or any action you took, that might explain why a tracker action on you last night would have showed nothing when you did something? Did you attempt to steal any items on N1, and if not, then why not?

No I didn't attempt to steal any item n1 because I thought with only one night action I wanted to pass the amulet because it was associated with death and I didn't want to die the first day

[Louis]

2 minutes ago, ChopBam said:

@Louis Who are your top suspects right now?

Jeod because of a hunch that's all

[Nodlied]

15 minutes ago, ChopBam said:

If Mojo's death was a delayed kill, an idea which I'm willing to entertain, this would implicate Nodlied yes?

Absolutely. However, it is easy to test.

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Nodlied said:

Absolutely. However, it is easy to test.

(I just like using this emoji tbf)

[Nodlied]

1 minute ago, OrangeP47 said:

(I just like using this emoji tbf)

(So do I like to use this one.)

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Nodlied said:

(So do I like to use this one.)

That's the one I usually use but it's always nice to change things up every once in awhile.

[Nodlied]

Just now, OrangeP47 said:

That's the one I usually use but it's always nice to change things up every once in awhile.

[Retaliation]

1 minute ago, OrangeP47 said:

That's the one I usually use but it's always nice to change things up every once in awhile.

>Changing things up

[Jeod]

17 minutes ago, Louis said:

No I didn't attempt to steal any item n1 because I thought with only one night action I wanted to pass the amulet because it was associated with death and I didn't want to die the first day

Usually item actions are separate from character actions. I don't have any items so I can't verify whether it's changed this game.

I will vouch for Nodlied--he's been consistent the entire game and forthcoming both here and in our masonry, which ended as of daystart.

The amulet may have not been stolen by a player, but passed on its own every time a player dies. Louis, who did you pass the amulet to and whoever you did pass it to, do you still have it given Mojoman's death?

[ChopBam]

4 minutes ago, Jeod said:

The amulet may have not been stolen by a player, but passed on its own every time a player dies. Louis, who did you pass the amulet to and whoever you did pass it to, do you still have it given Mojoman's death?

Louis passed it to Category 5, who said it was stolen. Now I have it, received during N2.

19 hours ago, Category 5 Hurricane said:

Also, someone apparently really wanted the item that Louis gave me because it was stolen during the day. Unfortunately I didn't bother to look at what it was other than to confirm that I couldn't use it. An amulet of some kind. I suppose Louis could describe it in more detail, now that it is missing and presumably in scum hands.

 

[Jeod]

Correct. N1 had no kill, so Louis was able to pass it to Cat5 with no repercussions. At the end of D2, iLTS was lynched, so the amulet got passed on its own. N3 though is a toss-up and if she passed it to you and you got to keep it, the theory is shot.

[Jeod]

@Louis, don't you still have the amulet's description in your PM? If not, do you remember what it said about death?

[Sunflower]

10 minutes ago, Jeod said:

Usually item actions are separate from character actions. I don't have any items so I can't verify whether it's changed this game.

I can't figure out how to paste two quotes from different pages, but it says on the D1 post that you can use items and actions at the same time.

[ChopBam]

2 minutes ago, Jeod said:

Correct. N1 had no kill, so Louis was able to pass it to Cat5 with no repercussions. At the end of D2, iLTS was lynched, so the amulet got passed on its own. N3 though is a toss-up and if she passed it to you and you got to keep it, the theory is shot.

Which theory? You're assuming it went back to Louis at iLTS lynch?

[Louis]

9 minutes ago, Jeod said:

Usually item actions are separate from character actions. I don't have any items so I can't verify whether it's changed this game.

I will vouch for Nodlied--he's been consistent the entire game and forthcoming both here and in our masonry, which ended as of daystart.

The amulet may have not been stolen by a player, but passed on its own every time a player dies. Louis, who did you pass the amulet to and whoever you did pass it to, do you still have it given Mojoman's death?

Well I didn't know it was a separate action thingy.

I don't know where it passed after Cat5 but I think Chop said he had it.

2 minutes ago, Jeod said:

Correct. N1 had no kill, so Louis was able to pass it to Cat5 with no repercussions. At the end of D2, iLTS was lynched, so the amulet got passed on its own. N3 though is a toss-up and if she passed it to you and you got to keep it, the theory is shot.

We'll have to see if it passes after this day if someone gets lynched.

[Nodlied]

1 minute ago, Jeod said:

@Louis, don't you still have the amulet's description in your PM? If not, do you remember what it said about death?

I don't know if it would say anything. I got stuffed in the pumpkin and, at the end of it, the PM said that I now have the pumpkin. Nothing to suggest that it's an item though. Currently waiting on Retaliation or Shade to answer that.

[Jeod]

Just now, Sunflower said:

I can't figure out how to paste two quotes from different pages, but it says on the D1 post that you can use items and actions at the same time.

Oh thanks. So an extension to my amulet theory is that it ensures a kill in the event the game stalls. Since there was no kill N1, I wonder if Louis was "marked for death" by the amulet. However, since there has been death now, it has not given Chopbam the same mark.

Tl;dr, it's a cursed item.

[Louis]

2 minutes ago, Jeod said:

@Louis, don't you still have the amulet's description in your PM? If not, do you remember what it said about death?

No I don't anymore, you'd have to ask Chop to see what it says now

[Jeod]

1 minute ago, ChopBam said:

Which theory? You're assuming it went back to Louis at iLTS lynch?

The theory that it's a self-passing item.

[ChopBam]

2 minutes ago, Louis said:

No I don't anymore, you'd have to ask Chop to see what it says now

I guess I'll clarify the post of mine that I'm quoting below: there is no description. I just have this weird amulet in my possession.

1 hour ago, ChopBam said:

I also got no info on it relating to death.

 

[Sunflower]

3 minutes ago, ChopBam said:

I guess I'll clarify the post of mine that I'm quoting below: there is no description. I just have this weird amulet in my possession.

 

Does it have a name?

[Louis]

2 minutes ago, ChopBam said:

I guess I'll clarify the post of mine that I'm quoting below: there is no description. I just have this weird amulet in my possession.

 

Hmmm then how come it said it was related to death me?

[Jeod]

Here is a comparison object to illustrate my theory: https://harrypotter.fandom.com/wiki/Opal_Necklace

I believe the amulet is of scum or tp origin and is an anti-stalling item--it marks the current holder for death if there are no deaths two days in a row.

[Jeod]

My amulet theory leads to the following critical question: on Day 2, who did not seem to care whether or not a lynch happened?

[ChopBam]

2 minutes ago, Sunflower said:

Does it have a name?

no.

2 minutes ago, Louis said:

Hmmm then how come it said it was related to death me?

Very suspicious-sounding, isn't it?

[OrangeP47]

It sounded like Louis said it had death markings BEFORE we didn't have a death though, so it's kind of jumping the gun.

I mean, I'm suspicious of it too, but I'm not quite sure what to make of it yet.

[OrangeP47]

Like... if we're all throwing out these ideas.... it's like it had death on it but the death came out of it at some point.

[Jeod]

@Louis Did you start the game with the amulet (Day 1) or did it come into your possession at night (Night 1)?

[ChopBam]

UPDATE: I was looking in the wrong place. The first post in my PM was updated with the amulet info. Yes, it's related to death. @Louis we're good on that part.