Games [GAME OVER] CYOR - Supernatural Edition

[OrangeP47]

I'd appreciate if more people answered my survey.  I have reason to suspect Nodlied neutral claim is false.

[Shade939]

Just now, OrangeP47 said:

I'd appreciate if more people answered my survey.  I have reason to suspect Nodlied neutral claim is false.

Do you really need me to answer that.

[OrangeP47]

1 minute ago, Shade939 said:

Do you really need me to answer that.

Well you're generally unhelpful on theorycrafting so no, you can have a pass if you really want it

[Nodlied]

2 minutes ago, ChopBam said:

You want me to check you tonight?

Well that's a load of interesting. Yeah I'm definitely not undead. If the only way for scum to kill you is to kill the person you're hiding behind, it's best you hide behind me for more than just that one reason. We have a sort of symbiosis in this case.

 Do you have any other uses for us, Nodlied?

1. Absolutely fine with that.

2. Well, they can also just kill me during the night should I decide not to hide. But I'm fine with hiding behind you if necessary.

3. Other uses? I have no idea. I mean, my objective is somewhat selfish after all.

[Sunflower]

6 minutes ago, OrangeP47 said:

I'd appreciate if more people answered my survey.  I have reason to suspect Nodlied neutral claim is false.

Are you implying that you're neutral?

My answer to your survey is I have no idea.

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Sunflower said:

Are you implying that you're neutral?

My answer to your survey is I have no idea.

Yes, I'm counter-claiming neutral, because I highly doubt we'd have two neutral players in this game.

[ChopBam]

56 minutes ago, Nodlied said:

And, as I've stated before, I wanted to hide behind Choppy on N1. Simply because he claimed ghost as his flavour (which meant that I wouldn't kill him).

One more question on this part. You wanted to hide behind me N1 but were blocked. Last night you were not blocked but you chose to do nothing. Why didn't you hide behind me last night?

[Killing_You]

I have to leave for a while, but suffice to say, I don't buy Nodlied's claim.

##vote Nodlied

Just now, OrangeP47 said:

Yes, I'm counter-claiming neutral, because I highly doubt we'd have two neutral players in this game.

Neutral jailer sounds far more plausible to me than neutral hider with a killing edge.

While I'm gone, I'll be considering how to use this shot. I'd rather not be jailed anymore.

[iLikeToSnipe]

11 minutes ago, Shade939 said:

What is your action you can't use on me?

Any action. My only targeted action is my protection ability. I'm assuming any item I might receive, if they're in the game, has the same limitations.

[ChopBam]

5 minutes ago, OrangeP47 said:

Yes, I'm counter-claiming neutral, because I highly doubt we'd have two neutral players in this game.

Why? Cause it'd mean 1/5 of all the players are neutral?

[OrangeP47]

Just now, ChopBam said:

Why? Cause it'd mean 1/5 of all the players are neutral?

10 players, assuming 2 scum standard, leaves 8.  Add in 1 neutral, me, leaves 7.  Given these games generally have a TP, that means 6.  6 town.  Any smaller and I just don't see it.  One neutral makes calculating for MYLO or LYLO hard, two would make it even harder, and I don't think Irish would want to deal with that.

[Sunflower]

11 minutes ago, OrangeP47 said:

Yes, I'm counter-claiming neutral, because I highly doubt we'd have two neutral players in this game.

And what is your objective?

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Sunflower said:

And what is your objective?

To jail 3 separate people over the course of the game, which is one reason why I want KY to use his shot.  I'll protect him for the good of helping town, but it is kind of putting a crimp in my objective.

[Shade939]

Just now, OrangeP47 said:

To jail 3 separate people over the course of the game, which is one reason why I want KY to use his shot.  I'll protect him for the good of helping town, but it is kind of putting a crimp in my objective.

"Jail"

[iLikeToSnipe]

Just now, OrangeP47 said:

To jail 3 separate people over the course of the game, which is one reason why I want KY to use his shot.  I'll protect him for the good of helping town, but it is kind of putting a crimp in my objective.

That's an interesting objective, doesn't seem too hard to pull off...

[Sunflower]

4 minutes ago, OrangeP47 said:

To jail 3 separate people over the course of the game, which is one reason why I want KY to use his shot.  I'll protect him for the good of helping town, but it is kind of putting a crimp in my objective.

Are you aligned with me?

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Shade939 said:

"Jail"

Third person who gets jailed gets a helpful prize for helping me with my research.

[ChopBam]

TBH if we're unsure on a lynch target, claimed neutral lynches are safer.

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Sunflower said:

Are you aligned with me?

Technically speaking I'm my own thing, but I always try to help town as TP or neutral, and have a strong track record of it, unless as TP my objective absolutely precludes it.  So, are you town?

[OrangeP47]

1 minute ago, ChopBam said:

TBH if we're unsure on a lynch target, claimed neutral lynches are safer.

I like how you say this when I start talking about being neutral, yet seemed ready to buddy buddy Nodlied when he claimed it.

[Sunflower]

4 minutes ago, OrangeP47 said:

Technically speaking I'm my own thing, but I always try to help town as TP or neutral, and have a strong track record of it, unless as TP my objective absolutely precludes it.  So, are you town?

What do you think?

[ChopBam]

Just now, OrangeP47 said:

I like how you say this when I start talking about being neutral, yet seemed ready to buddy buddy Nodlied when he claimed it.

I'm more likely to vote him as the suggested neutral lynch. Do you object to this?

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Sunflower said:

What do you think?

Currently I have you leaning town, but your current line of questioning is a bit weird

[OrangeP47]

Just now, ChopBam said:

I'm more likely to vote him as the suggested neutral lynch. Do you object to this?

I don't object to voting Nodlied. I may as well have my vote on him at the moment, though I generally prefer conversation to be wrapping up when I vote.

[Sunflower]

4 minutes ago, OrangeP47 said:

Currently I have you leaning town, but your current line of questioning is a bit weird

You've been acting like god's gift to the town so far, so I thought it was weird that you're suddenly claiming neutral.

[Nodlied]

16 minutes ago, ChopBam said:

One more question on this part. You wanted to hide behind me N1 but were blocked. Last night you were not blocked but you chose to do nothing. Why didn't you hide behind me last night?

As I said. I am an easy lynch. Nightkilling me therefore seems unlikely and, perhaps, not even worth it. Thus staying put would be safer than hiding behind somebody that could get killed.
 

7 minutes ago, OrangeP47 said:

To jail 3 separate people over the course of the game, which is one reason why I want KY to use his shot.  I'll protect him for the good of helping town, but it is kind of putting a crimp in my objective.

Reminds me of that Frankenstein objective from last year.

[OrangeP47]

1 minute ago, Sunflower said:

You've been acting like god's gift to the town so far, so I thought it was weird that you're suddenly claiming neutral.

I'm always important

Just now, Nodlied said:

Reminds me of that Frankenstein objective from last year.

My 3rd target simply gains a defensive passive.

[Shade939]

1 minute ago, Nodlied said:

Reminds me of that Frankenstein objective from last year.

Yes, he has been trying to keep you alive since he jailed you.

[Shade939]

1 minute ago, OrangeP47 said:

I'm always important

My 3rd target simply gains a defensive passive.

Refining your medical techniques then?

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Shade939 said:

Yes, he has been trying to keep you alive since he jailed you.

Not really, I'd be fine with him going down.